CyberCriminal.com

Jon Paul Cirelli

We are investigating Jon Paul Cirelli for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

Person Name : Jon Paul Cirelli

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 05 Nov 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Bilora LLC

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1521/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 10 Mar 2025

Jon Paul Cirelli
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Jon Paul Cirelli in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Jon Paul Cirelli over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Jon Paul Cirelli - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Jon Paul Cirelli, a financial advisor whose name has surfaced in various circles. What I discovered was a tapestry of business ventures, customer disputes, and potential attempts to obscure unfavorable information.

A Web of Affiliations

Jon Paul Cirelli presents himself as a seasoned financial advisor with a focus on capital preservation and building lifetime income streams for high-net-worth individuals. His association with Great Point Capital LLC is prominently displayed, where he emphasizes his expertise in estate and retirement planning, as well as tax deferral strategies

However, Cirelli’s professional endeavors extend beyond this singular affiliation. According to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), he has been involved with multiple entities, including:

  • JP Cirelli, Inc.: Since January 2014, Cirelli has been receiving checks from securities through this entity
  • Elite Access Opportunities: Starting June 2020, he has been managing personal real estate under this company
  • Parsiani Real Estate: From August 2020, Cirelli has been involved in selling tangible real estate
  • Pivot Professional Partners: Since March 2020, he has been processing securities with this firm
  • Renegade Capital Advisors LLC: Beginning May 2023, Cirelli has been structuring investments through this entity.
  • Green Alliance Labs LLC: Since April 2022, he has taken on a consulting role here
  • 718C LLC: Starting July 2022, he has been raising capital as a silent partner in this financial services company
  • Perry CPA Group LLC: From October 2018, Cirelli has been recruiting clients for this group
  • Coastal Way Financial Group: Since August 2016, he has been raising funds as a managing partner

While diversification can be a hallmark of a robust career, the sheer number and variety of Cirelli’s affiliations raise questions about his focus and the potential for conflicts of interest.

Customer Disputes and Allegations

Delving deeper, I uncovered that Cirelli has been named in customer disputes alleging negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and violations of securities laws  Such allegations are serious and warrant thorough examination. Investors entrust advisors with their financial well-being, and any breach of this trust can have devastating consequences.

The Art of Adverse Media Screening

In today’s digital age, adverse media screening has become an essential tool for due diligence. This process involves systematically searching public information sources to identify negative news related to individuals or entities. For financial professionals like Cirelli, adverse media checks can reveal potential red flags that might not be immediately apparent.

Effective adverse media screening involves monitoring a vast array of sources, including news outlets, blogs, and social media platforms. The goal is to uncover any information that could pose a threat to a company’s compliance or reputation. For someone with Cirelli’s extensive network of affiliations, consistent and comprehensive monitoring is crucial.

A Proactive Approach to Risk Management

Organizations are increasingly adopting proactive strategies to conduct adverse media screening. This involves continuous monitoring of media sources to detect potential red flags early and respond promptly to mitigate risks. For investors considering partnerships with individuals like Cirelli, understanding the importance of such screenings can be pivotal in making informed decisions.

The Challenge of Information Suppression

One of the more concerning aspects of my investigation was the potential for information suppression. While there is no direct evidence that Cirelli has attempted to censor unfavorable information, the lack of accessible adverse media could suggest efforts to manage his online reputation. In an era where digital footprints are nearly impossible to erase, the absence of negative news can be as telling as its presence.

The Role of Regulatory Bodies

Regulatory bodies like FINRA play a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the financial industry. They provide platforms such as BrokerCheck, where the public can access information about financial professionals. Cirelli’s BrokerCheck report reveals six disclosures, which include customer disputes and other matters. These disclosures are vital for investors to assess the risk associated with a financial advisor.

A Call to Action for Investors

For potential investors, the findings of this investigation serve as a cautionary tale. It’s imperative to conduct thorough due diligence before entrusting one’s financial future to an advisor. This includes reviewing regulatory disclosures, understanding the advisor’s affiliations, and being vigilant for any red flags.

While diversification in professional endeavors can be commendable, the extent and nature of Jon Paul Cirelli’s affiliations, coupled with past customer disputes, necessitate a cautious approach. Investors are urged to perform comprehensive due diligence and remain vigilant to ensure their financial interests are safeguarded.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45992815
  • November 05, 2024
  • Bilora LLC
  • https://www.wkyt.com/content/news/Woman-boyfriend-sentenced-to-prison-for-Kentucky-soldiers-murder-[REDACTED].html
  • https://www.carlsonlaw.com/jon-paul-cirelli-concorde-broker-has-2-5-million-complaint/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

carlsonlaw.com

Broker Under Fire: Jon Paul Cirelli Faces $2.5 Million Investor Complaint

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

sonnlaw.com

Jon Paul Cirelli Accused of Breach of Fiduciary Duty and Securities Law Violations

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login