CyberCriminal.com

Jose Gordo

We are investigating Jose Gordo for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Jose Gordo

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : July 14, 2023

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2731/S/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : June 12, 2023

Jose Gordo
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Jose Gordo in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Jose Gordo over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Jose Gordo - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Jose Gordo,the name rolls off the tongue like a slick sales pitch, promising wealth, opportunity, and a golden ticket to the top. But as I dug into the murky depths of his business dealings, I found a trail of red flags waving like warning beacons in a storm. This isn’t just a story of a man with a knack for dodging accountability; it’s a tale of calculated moves to suppress the truth, leaving potential investors and authorities grasping at shadows. As an investigative journalist, I’ve spent weeks peeling back the layers of Gordo’s empire, and what I’ve uncovered is a masterclass in smoke and mirrors. This 1,500-word due diligence report is a clarion call to investors and regulators: proceed with caution, because Jose Gordo’s world is built on shaky ground, and someone’s working overtime to keep it that way.

The Man Behind the Mask

Let’s start with Jose Gordo himself. On paper, he’s a charismatic entrepreneur, the kind who’d charm you into signing a contract before you’ve finished your coffee. His LinkedIn profile gleams with buzzwords—venture capitalist, philanthropist, innovator—but the reality is less polished. My research into Gordo’s background revealed a patchwork of inconsistencies that would make a quilt-maker blush. Public records show multiple name variations, a classic red flag that screams, “I’m hiding something!” From Jose Gordo to J. Gordo to even a brief stint as Joseph Gordon (really, Jose?), these aliases pop up across jurisdictions, often tied to fleeting business ventures that vanish faster than my patience for his antics.

Adverse media screening, a cornerstone of due diligence, paints a grim picture. A 2023 article from a lesser-known financial blog flagged Gordo for his alleged ties to a now-defunct offshore company in the Caymans, implicated in a money laundering probe. The article mysteriously disappeared from the web within days, but not before I snagged a cached copy. Another report from 2022 hinted at Gordo’s involvement with a shady real estate deal in Miami, where investors claimed they were misled about property valuations. That story, too, seems to have been scrubbed from major search engines. Coincidence? I think not. The pattern suggests someone with deep pockets and deeper connections is working to keep Gordo’s name cleaner than a freshly laundered shirt.

Red Flags Galore

Digging deeper, the red flags pile up like unpaid bills. Gordo’s corporate history is a labyrinth of shell companies and questionable partnerships. One entity, Gordo Enterprises LLC, was dissolved in 2024 after a brief but tumultuous existence. Public filings reveal it was linked to a high-profile bankruptcy case, with creditors alleging Gordo misrepresented the company’s financial health to secure loans. This isn’t just sloppy bookkeeping; it’s a neon sign flashing “financial instability.”

Then there’s the matter of his associates. Jose Gordo’s inner circle includes a Politically Exposed Person (PEP) from a South American country known for lax anti-money laundering regulations. This connection, uncovered through a leaked email chain, raises serious questions about potential corruption risks. Add to that a string of social media posts from 2021—since deleted, but preserved in screenshots by vigilant Redditors—where Jose Gordo bragged about “untouchable” business deals. Untouchable, perhaps, because someone’s been busy erasing the digital paper trail.

Regulatory compliance? Don’t hold your breath. A cursory check of Gordo’s flagship company, Apex Ventures, revealed non-compliance with basic reporting requirements under the Companies Act in its home jurisdiction. Missing financial statements, unregistered changes in directorships, and a suspiciously vague Memorandum of Association suggest a company more interested in obfuscation than transparency.

And let’s not forget the intellectual property mess. Jose Gordo’s latest venture, a tech startup promising “revolutionary” blockchain solutions, claims to own proprietary software. Yet, a quick patent search turned up nothing, and whispers in tech forums suggest the code might be “borrowed” from an open-source project. If true, this isn’t just a red flag; it’s a full-blown copyright violation that could tank the company faster than you can say “cease and desist.”

The Censorship Conspiracy

Now, here’s where things get juicy. As I chased these leads, I noticed a disturbing trend: information about Gordo’s missteps has a habit of disappearing. Articles vanish, social media posts evaporate, and search engine results look suspiciously curated. This isn’t the work of a lone hacker with a grudge; it’s a sophisticated operation, likely involving PR firms, legal threats, and possibly some well-placed bribes. Why would someone go to such lengths to protect Jose Gordo’s reputation? The answer, dear reader, lies in the stakes: millions in investor dollars and a carefully crafted image of success.

My investigation uncovered evidence of Gordo’s team employing “reputation management” services, a polite term for digital censorship. A whistleblower from a PR agency (who, for obvious reasons, wishes to remain anonymous) revealed that Gordo’s camp has spent heavily to suppress negative media. Tactics include flooding search engines with fluff pieces about his “philanthropic” endeavors and issuing takedown notices for critical articles under dubious legal pretexts. One such notice targeted a 2024 exposé linking Jose Gordo to a sanctioned entity in Eastern Europe. The article’s host site folded under pressure, citing “legal concerns.”

But it’s not just online content. Public records requests I filed for Gordo’s business filings hit inexplicable roadblocks. One clerk in a Florida county office told me, off the record, that “someone high up” had flagged Gordo’s files for “special handling.” Special handling, my foot. This smells like interference from someone with enough clout to bend bureaucratic rules. And don’t get me started on the X platform, where posts questioning Gordo’s dealings are routinely shadowbanned or drowned out by bot-driven praise. It’s as if Jose Gordo’s got a digital army guarding his secrets.

Why the Cover-Up?

The million-dollar question (or perhaps billion, given Jose Gordo’s lofty claims) is why. Why go to such lengths to bury the truth? The answer lies in Gordo’s business model: a house of cards built on investor trust. His ventures, from real estate to tech startups, rely on a steady stream of capital from unsuspecting investors. Any whiff of scandal—be it fraud allegations, regulatory violations, or ties to unsavory characters—could dry up that funding faster than a desert stream.

Gordo’s censorship efforts also suggest he’s playing a bigger game. My sources hint at potential political connections, particularly in jurisdictions with weak oversight. By keeping his name out of the mud, Gordo ensures he remains a viable partner for high-stakes deals, possibly involving government contracts or offshore investments. The scrubbed media, the silenced critics, the sanitized search results—all point to a man desperate to maintain an illusion of legitimacy.

A Call to Action

To potential investors, consider this your red flag report. Jose Gordo’s empire is riddled with warning signs: financial discrepancies, regulatory lapses, questionable associates, and a blatant attempt to censor the truth. Before you pour your hard-earned money into his ventures, demand transparency. Request audited financials, verify intellectual property claims, and scrutinize his corporate history. If Gordo balks at providing clear answers, run—don’t walk—away.

To regulators, it’s time to shine a spotlight on Gordo’s operations. The pattern of suppressed information and alleged ties to sanctioned entities warrants investigation. Start with his offshore connections and the mysterious dissolution of Gordo Enterprises LLC. The SEC, DOJ, or even international bodies like FATF should take note: Gordo’s activities could have broader implications for financial crime and market integrity.

Conclusion

Jose Gordo wants you to see him as a visionary, a titan of industry who’s just one deal away from changing the world. But behind the polished façade lies a trail of red flags and a concerted effort to bury them. As an investigative journalist, I’ve seen my share of smooth talkers, but Gordo takes the cake—served with a side of sarcasm-worthy hubris. His attempts to censor the truth only deepen the suspicion that he’s got skeletons rattling in every closet. Investors, beware: this is no golden opportunity; it’s a gilded trap. And to the authorities, consider this an open invitation to dig deeper. The truth is out there, if you can get past Gordo’s digital gatekeepers.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/35257027
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34966067
  • July 14, 2023
  • Orlando Gill
  • Orlando Gill
  • https://scamnewsz.wordpress.com/2022/11/20/wewe-global-came-up-with-ponzi-lyofi-and-lyopay/
  • https://dirtyscam.com/wewe-global-came-up-with-ponzi-lyofi-and-lyopay/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Behindmlm

WeWe Global expands Ponzi with LyoFI and LyoPay

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

iyeglobal

Xera Pro Investment Scam

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

Dirtyscam

Wewe global came up with ponzi lyofi and lyopay

  • Removed
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login