CyberCriminal.com

Justbag.net

We are investigating Justbag.net for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Justbag.net

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 02 Nov 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 8781/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 10 Mar 2025

Justbag.net
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Justbag.net in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Justbag.net over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Justbag.net - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Justbag.net presents itself as a trusted destination for luxury handbags, but a closer look reveals a different story—one riddled with red flags, customer complaints, and alleged attempts to silence critics. From inconsistent product listings to questionable business practices, the company’s reputation is anything but spotless. As I dug deeper, it became clear that Justbag.net isn’t just facing scrutiny; it’s actively trying to suppress negative information. So, what exactly is this company hiding, and why should potential investors and consumers be concerned? Let’s unravel the truth.

The Allure of Justbag.net

At first glance, Justbag.net presents itself as a haven for luxury enthusiasts. The website boasts a curated collection of designer bags, each accompanied by detailed descriptions and high-quality images. Their “About Us” section emphasizes a commitment to authenticity, highlighting rigorous inspection processes and a lifetime authenticity guarantee.  They also tout their verified presence on platforms like Poshmark and Vestiaire Collective, aiming to bolster their credibility.

Diving Deeper: The Cracks Begin to Show

However, as I delved deeper, inconsistencies began to emerge. A thread on the PurseForum raised eyebrows about Justbag.net’s legitimacy. One user noted that the company’s listed address corresponded to an apartment complex in Florida, casting doubt on their portrayal as a bona fide boutique . Further scrutiny revealed that some product photos on Justbag.net mirrored those on other websites where the items were marked as sold, suggesting potential misrepresentation of available stock.

Customer Experiences: A Mixed Bag

Customer reviews paint a conflicting picture. On Trustindex.io, Justbag.net boasts a 4.6-star rating based on 71 reviews, with some customers expressing satisfaction with their purchases. One reviewer gushed about receiving a Louis Vuitton wallet in impeccable condition, complete with a Certificate of Authenticity.

Conversely, other reviews narrate less favorable experiences. A customer recounted purchasing a bag that was never shipped, with communication from the company ceasing after initial excuses about staffing shortages. Another individual described receiving a Louis Vuitton bag of subpar quality, alleging it was a counterfeit. Such disparities in customer experiences raise questions about the consistency and reliability of Justbag.net’s operations.

The Reddit Rabbit Hole

Reddit discussions further muddy the waters. In the r/ManyBaggers subreddit, users debated the legitimacy of Justbag.net. While some defended the company, citing thousands of sales and a solid rating on Poshmark, others shared cautionary tales. One user detailed how, after expressing skepticism on a forum, they were harassed by individuals suspected to be affiliated with Justbag.net, suggesting attempts to intimidate critics.

Red Flags Waving

Several warning signs become evident:

  1. Inconsistent Product Listings: The replication of product photos from other websites where items are marked as sold suggests potential misrepresentation.
  2. Questionable Business Address: Operating from a residential apartment while portraying the image of a high-end boutique raises transparency concerns.
  3. Mixed Customer Reviews: The stark contrast between glowing and scathing reviews indicates possible issues with product authenticity and customer service.
  4. Aggressive Response to Criticism: Allegations of harassment toward critics hint at attempts to suppress negative information.

The Censorship Conundrum

The purported harassment of individuals voicing concerns is particularly troubling. Such actions suggest a deliberate strategy to silence dissent and maintain a facade of credibility. This tactic not only undermines the principles of free speech but also deprives potential customers and investors of vital information.

A Call to Action

In light of these findings, it’s imperative for potential investors and consumers to exercise caution. The luxury resale market is fraught with pitfalls, and due diligence is essential. Authorities should investigate the allegations against Justbag.net, ensuring that any unethical or illegal practices are brought to light.

Conclusion

While Justbag.net may offer genuine products to some customers, the myriad red flags cannot be ignored. From inconsistent product listings and dubious business practices to attempts at censoring criticism, the evidence points toward a need for scrutiny. As always, in the world of luxury goods, if a deal seems too good to be true, it probably is.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45907163
  • November 02, 2024
  • Bilora LLC
  • https://www.bendsource.com/news/justified-homicide-awbrey-butte-shooting-raises-big-questions-2178555
  • https://forum.purseblog.com/threads/justbag-net-reviews.1070281/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

purseforum

Justbag.net Reviews?

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

Trustpilot

Reviews of Justbag.net

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login