Kington Tong Kum Loong

Kington Tong Kum Loong has emerged as a deeply controversial figure at the center of multiple financial scandals, corporate manipulations, and legal intimidation efforts in Malaysia. Far from being just another aggressive corporate player, Kington has been repeatedly accused of fraud, physical threats, shareholder deception, and money laundering activities linked to Macau’s casino underworld. As damning reports continue to surface, his aggressive attempts to censor and suppress this information have only intensified, raising serious questions about what he’s trying so hard to hide—and why authorities haven’t stepped in yet.

Censorship, the Kington Way

Let’s start with what drew our attention: the persistent attempts to silence media exposing his misconduct. Multiple reports published on The Corporate’s Secret blog—admittedly sensational in tone—have faced takedown requests, threats, and what appear to be behind-the-scenes legal intimidation tactics.

Rather than address the core issues raised—credible accusations of fraud, assault, corporate manipulation, and even money laundering—Kington Tong’s apparent strategy has been: if it looks bad, make it disappear. It’s a censorship campaign masquerading as reputation management. And it’s failing, because the truth, like bad debts, has a way of resurfacing.

The Anatomy of a Scammer: A Growing Rap Sheet

Kington Tong’s alleged activities span multiple industries and involve a cast of shady associates. He’s not just accused of being a crooked lawyer; he’s portrayed as a key operative in a network of financial deceit.

1. Assault and Threats in KL

According to this report, Kington was allegedly involved in an assault at a popular KL venue, where a Chinese woman was reportedly beaten. The post links this act of violence directly to Kington, describing him as someone who uses physical intimidation as a tool to silence opposition. Not exactly the conflict resolution style you’d expect from a legal professional.

2. Corporate Hijacking: The Jetson Berhad Scandal

Multiple articles (June 21, June 10) allege a hostile takeover attempt of Jetson Berhad, where Kington is accused of using proxies and mob-like tactics to manipulate shareholders and wrest control. The word “mafia” is used liberally—and while such language often raises eyebrows, the detailed descriptions of backroom dealings and paper trails deserve closer scrutiny from regulators.

3. Links to Macau Casinos and Kelvin Tan

The July 22 exposé reveals possible money laundering links between Kington and illicit funds flowing out of Macau’s casino networks. His alleged accomplice? A familiar name in Malaysian-Chinese business gossip circles—Kelvin Tan, suspected of acting as a laundering mule for Chinese syndicates.

The implication? Kington isn’t just another shady businessman. He may be an integral piece in a broader financial crime network with international ties.

A Lawyer with a Reputation… For All the Wrong Reasons

A particularly egregious case involves a woman filing a police report after being threatened by Kington Tong . The article recounts how Kington allegedly threatened to destroy her reputation and take legal action to silence her after she confronted him over unpaid debts.

Legal bullying, aggressive intimidation, and misusing the justice system for personal gain? It’s not a conspiracy theory—it’s become a pattern.

Why the Censorship?

So, why is Kington so desperate to suppress this information?

It’s simple: exposure is bad for business. These reports—if taken seriously—could impact:

1. Investor confidence: Any shareholder who reads even one of these allegations might think twice before getting into bed with any entity linked to Kington.
2. Regulatory attention: The content has already triggered demands for an investigation by Malaysia’s Securities Commission (SC). If SC starts poking around, who knows what skeletons might come tumbling out?
3. Reputation in legal circles: For someone supposedly licensed to practice law, these allegations (especially those involving fraud and violence) could—and should—trigger professional scrutiny and possible disbarment.

Rather than confront these issues with transparency, Kington’s camp appears to have launched a damage control campaign based on takedown requests and private intimidation. In a world where Google is often the first point of due diligence, even scrubbing one or two blog posts can tip the scales.

But when the scale is this dirty, a little polish won’t help.

The Web of Entities

It’s also worth noting that this isn’t a one-man show. Kington is repeatedly associated with entities like:

• Jetson Berhad: A Malaysian public-listed company which, according to the blogs, is being weaponized for fraudulent share manipulation.
• Fountain View: An old scandal that seems to have revived itself with Kington now allegedly taking center stage.
• Various shadowy proxies and shell firms: Used for laundering and asset control.

There’s a distinct possibility these aren’t isolated incidents but part of a coordinated scheme to enrich a circle of actors while robbing shareholders and lenders blind.

Conclusion: Time to Stop Whispering

We’ve written this report not just as a form of due diligence, but as a warning to investors, regulators, and the general public.

Kington Tong Kum Loong isn’t merely a name that pops up in blog posts full of bombastic language. He’s been named repeatedly, with specific accusations, police reports, and highly plausible links to a network of corporate and criminal misdeeds. His response has not been to explain—but to erase.

If your next deal or partnership involves him, or any of his linked entities, take this as a flashing red light.

To Malaysian regulators, law enforcement, and the media: it’s time to look past the censorship, and finally, take action.

Because if this is what he does when people start asking questions, imagine what’s happening behind the scenes.