CyberCriminal.com

LBLV

We are investigating LBLV for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : LBLV

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : November 09, 2023

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 5456/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 16 March 2025

LBLV
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about LBLV in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into LBLV over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that LBLV - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

The Mirage of Prosperity

LBLV bills itself as a gateway to financial freedom, a community where aspiring traders can “connect” with experts and unlock the secrets of the markets. Their marketing materials are a symphony of buzzwords: “exclusive strategies,” “life-changing results,” and my personal favorite, “financial empowerment.” It’s all very inspiring—until you realize their most consistent “strategy” appears to be dodging accountability.

But let’s not take my word for it. The Brazilian complaint platform Reclame Aqui hosts a treasure trove of grievances against LBLV. Two threads in particular, which I’ll refer to as “The Warning” and “The Financial Coup,” paint a picture so bleak it would make even the most optimistic investor reach for a stiff drink. Customers allege everything from withheld withdrawals (“I’ve been waiting six months for my money!”) to outright deception (“They promised mentorship but ghosted me after payment”). One user eloquently summarized the experience as “a black hole for your savings.”

Yet LBLV’s response to these complaints? A mix of robotic corporate speak (“We’re committed to resolving this”) and, when that fails, radio silence. How very… innovative.

The Red Flags Are So Red, They’re Neon

Let’s play a game I like to call “Spot the Obvious.” Here’s what users report:

  1. Withdrawal Woes: The hallmark of any reputable financial service is, of course, the inability to access your own money. Multiple complainants describe Kafkaesque processes to withdraw funds, including sudden “fee” requirements, unexplained delays, and accounts mysteriously frozen after requesting payouts. One user noted they were told their withdrawal was “under review” indefinitely—a phrase that translates roughly to “Don’t hold your breath.”
  2. The Ghost Mentors: For a company that sells education, LBLV’s commitment to teaching seems… flexible. Customers paid hundreds (or thousands) for trading courses and mentorship, only to find their “experts” were about as reachable as a WhatsApp message to Mars. When pressed, LBLV blamed “high demand” for the lack of support. How convenient—nothing says “trust us” like blaming your customers for expecting what they paid for.
  3. The Five-Star Illusion: Before the complaints piled up, LBLV’s Reclame Aqui profile was curiously adorned with glowing reviews. But dig deeper, and a pattern emerges: many five-star ratings are from accounts with no prior activity, raving about “life-changing results” in suspiciously similar language. Meanwhile, legitimate negative reviews vanish faster than a meme coin’s value. Coincidence? Or a masterclass in reputation laundering?

Censorship as a Business Model

Here’s where LBLV’s creativity truly shines. Faced with a growing chorus of criticism, the company hasn’t opted for introspection or reform. Instead, they’ve embraced censorship with the enthusiasm of a dictator at a free-speech convention.

  • Disappearing Acts: Negative reviews on Reclame Aqui? Poof—gone. Users report their posts being removed within hours, often with no explanation. When questioned, LBLV hides behind platform policies, claiming violations of “terms of service.” Yet curiously, only critical posts seem to breach these terms. Positive ones, no matter how sketchy, stay put. Imagine that.
  • Legal Threats: Several complainants mentioned receiving intimidating messages from LBLV or affiliated parties, warning of “legal consequences” for “defamation.” One user shared an email stating, “Your claims harm our reputation and will be pursued vigorously.” Translation: “Shut up, or we’ll bury you in paperwork.” It’s a classic tactic—bullying critics into silence while pretending to uphold “professional standards.”
  • The Social Media Purge: On platforms like Instagram and YouTube, comments questioning LBLV’s practices are swiftly deleted. Their pages are scrubbed cleaner than a crime scene, leaving only a curated highlight reel of success stories. Meanwhile, former members allege that internal groups police dissent, banning users who dare to ask, “Where’s my money?”

Why Should Investors Care? Let Me Count the Ways

If you’re thinking, “So what? All companies have complaints,” let me stop you right there. This isn’t about a few disgruntled customers—it’s about systemic deception. When a firm prioritizes silencing critics over addressing issues, it’s not a red flag; it’s a fireworks display spelling “RUN.”

Consider the parallels to Ponzi schemes: delayed withdrawals, overemphasis on recruitment (sorry, “community building”), and reliance on fresh capital to sustain operations. Add in the censorship playbook, and you’ve got a recipe for disaster. Investors lured by promises of easy gains may instead find themselves funding someone else’s exit strategy.

And let’s not forget the regulatory vacuum. Brazil’s financial oversight bodies have yet to take public action against LBLV, allowing the company to operate in a gray area. But inertia isn’t an excuse—authorities have a duty to investigate patterns of fraud before more families are harmed.

A Call to Action (Because Apparently, Someone Has to Do It)

To potential investors: If you’re tempted by LBLV’s slick marketing, ask yourself: Why would a legitimate company need to silence its critics? Why are there no verifiable track records of success? And why does their business model seem to rely more on legal threats than actual trading?

To regulators: Wake up. The complaints are piling up, the tactics are escalating, and the victims are real people. A simple probe into LBLV’s financials, withdrawal processes, and marketing claims could either exonerate them or expose a scam in progress. What’s the hold-up?

To LBLV: If by some miracle you’re reading this, here’s a free tip—transparency beats censorship every time. Address the complaints head-on. Publish audited results. Stop hiding behind lawyers and start answering emails. Or, you know, keep digging that hole. At this rate, you’ll hit bedrock by Christmas.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42899318
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/37298149
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42683711
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40001395
  • November 09, 2023
  • March 8, 2024
  • June 29, 2024
  • July 08, 2024
  • sara james corp
  • Jhanaja LLC
  • hansen llc
  • Maria Watson Lawfirm LLC
  • https://wildbluepress.com/jackson-48-hours-interview-true-crime-oregon-murder/
  • https://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/news/murder-trial-day-two-man-accused-of-murdering-partner-shouted-im-sorry-ive-killed-her-2338642
  • https://forum.unity.com/threads/behavior-designer-behavior-trees-for-everyone.227497/page-19
  • https://www.irishexaminer.com/world/arid-30447982.html
  • https://www.reclameaqui.com.br/lblv-connecting-traders/nao-entre-na-lblv-antes-de-ler-isso_lTY9O0zmYF5kdTIE
  • https://www.reclameaqui.com.br/lblv-connecting-traders/lblv-g-o-l-p-e-financeiro_IS5nzH0U9tdf7A8t

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

reclameaqui.com

LBLV - FINANCIAL SCAM

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

reclameaqui.com

DO NOT JOIN LBLV BEFORE READING THIS

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login