CyberCriminal.com

Mandip Sidhu

We are investigating Mandip Sidhu for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Mandip Sidhu

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 25 Dec 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 5483/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Mar 2025

Mandip Sidhu
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Mandip Sidhu in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Mandip Sidhu over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Mandip Sidhu - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Mandip Sidhu, a former pharmacist and director of Pharmaceutical Health Limited (PHL), was convicted of orchestrating a large-scale illegal supply of Class C drugs, including diazepam, zolpidem, and zopiclone. Her operation, described by Southwark Crown Court as being of “industrial scale,” involved over 55 million doses of powerful prescription medications being illicitly distributed between 2013 and 2017. The staggering volume of drugs trafficked by Sidhu’s company dwarfed the total amount legally dispensed in all of England during the same period. Despite the severity of her crimes, Sidhu received a suspended prison sentence and was ordered to perform community service.

Lawsuits and Legal Actions

  1. Criminal Charges and Conviction
    • Crimes Committed:
      • Illegal supply of Class C drugs (diazepam, zolpidem, and zopiclone) without proper licensing.
      • Forgery of invoices to mislead the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Authority (MHRA).
    • Scale of the Operation:
      • Between May 2013 and June 2017, Sidhu’s company, PHL, illegally supplied over 55 million doses of Class C drugs, including 47 million doses of diazepam alone.
      • To put this in perspective, only 5 million diazepam tablets were legally dispensed in the entire country during 2014.
    • Guilty Plea and Sentence:
      • Sidhu pleaded guilty to five counts of supplying Class C drugs and one count of forgery.
      • She was sentenced to:
        • Two years imprisonment for each of the five counts of illegal supply.
        • Four months imprisonment for forgery.
        • All sentences were suspended for 24 months, meaning she avoided serving prison time.
        • She was ordered to complete 200 hours of community service.
  2. Regulatory Violations
    • Lack of Controlled Drug Licence:
      • Although Sidhu was a licensed pharmacist with the General Pharmaceutical Council, she did not hold the Home Office Controlled Drug Licence required for trading in Class C substances.
    • Deception and Forgery:
      • Sidhu forged invoices in an attempt to deceive MHRA inspectors, making it appear as though the drugs were sold outside the European Economic Area (EEA) to conceal their illegal distribution.

Complaints and Allegations

  1. Massive Over-Supply of Prescription Drugs
  • The scale of Sidhu’s operation was described by prosecutors as “industrial,” with her company purchasing 4.27 million tablets in August 2014 and 4.5 million tablets in March 2015.
  • These massive purchases were made despite PHL having no record of legally dispensing any medication against a prescription since July 19, 2013.
  • This level of over-supply strongly indicated that the drugs were being diverted into the black market.
  1. Forgery and Deception
  • To cover her tracks, Sidhu created false invoices designed to mislead MHRA inspectors, suggesting that the drugs were exported rather than illegally distributed.
  • The forged invoice was intended to make it appear as though the medications were sold to a company outside the EEA, but this was a deliberate fabrication.
  1. Public Safety Risks
  • By flooding the illegal drug market with unregulated and potentially dangerous Class C substances, Sidhu endangered public health.
  • The drugs she distributed, including diazepam, are frequently abused and associated with addiction, overdose, and severe health consequences.

Conclusion

Mandip Sidhu’s pharmaceutical operation, while legally registered, masked a massive and dangerous drug trafficking scheme. Her illegal distribution of Class C drugs on an industrial scale exposed the cracks in the regulatory system, allowing her to move tens of millions of doses without proper oversight. Despite the massive scope of her crimes, Sidhu received a suspended sentence, raising questions about the leniency of the punishment relative to the severity of her offenses. Her case serves as a stark reminder of how pharmaceutical professionals can exploit their positions to traffic powerful drugs, endangering public safety and undermining trust in the healthcare system.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47499561
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49655418
  • December 25, 2024
  • March 06, 2025
  • JPW NEWS
  • [REDACTED]
  • https://jpw-news.exposure.co/pharmacists-sentenced-for-illegally-supplying-55-million-doses-of-controlled-drugs
  • https://www.tumblr.com/theeasterneyenews/772359910554058752/diazepam-dealers-pharmacists-sentenced-for?source=share
  • https://www.thepharmacist.co.uk/news/pharmacists-sentenced-for-illegally-supplying-55-million-doses-of-controlled-drugs/
  • https://www.chemistanddruggist.co.uk/CD138195/Diazepam-dealers-Pharmacists-sentenced-for-industrial-illegal-supply/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

thepharmacist.co.uk

Pharmacists sentenced for illegally supplying 55 million doses of controlled drugs

  • Removed
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login