CyberCriminal.com

Max Weiss

We are investigating Max Weiss for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Max Weiss

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 15 Jun 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7834/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

Max Weiss
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Max Weiss in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Max Weiss over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Max Weiss - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Max Weiss and his company, Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH, have come under intense scrutiny due to allegations that question the ethical integrity of their business practices. If these accusations are substantiated, they could lead to severe reputational damage, legal consequences, and a loss of trust among clients and business partners.

Fraudulent Copyright Takedown Notices

Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH has been accused of submitting fabricated copyright infringement complaints to suppress negative online content. These complaints allegedly targeted critical reviews and unfavorable media coverage. The misuse of legal mechanisms has raised concerns about perjury, fraud, and impersonation, suggesting attempts to manipulate public perception by eliminating unfavorable materials from search engines and digital platforms. Reports indicate that the company may have knowingly filed false Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown requests to remove content that was not actually infringing on any copyrights. If proven, this could constitute a serious violation of intellectual property laws and raise questions about the company’s ethical standards.

Suppression of Negative Information

There is evidence indicating deliberate efforts to silence critics and remove unflattering information about Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH. Rather than addressing concerns transparently, the company has reportedly relied on questionable tactics to maintain its reputation. Reports suggest that Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH has filed fraudulent copyright claims, issued legal threats against journalists and reviewers, and used manipulative search engine strategies to bury negative coverage. Some sources claim that the company has engaged in direct communication with search engines and online platforms to pressure them into removing unfavorable content, even when such content did not violate any policies. This raises concerns about the company’s willingness to engage in censorship and information suppression rather than addressing legitimate criticisms.

Reputation Management Through Dubious Methods

The company has also been accused of prioritizing its online reputation over transparency, utilizing unethical methods to ensure that only positive content remains visible. Allegations suggest that Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH engages in astroturfing, where fake positive reviews are generated to counteract negative publicity. Additionally, third-party agencies are reportedly hired to remove critical articles, while automated social media manipulation tactics, such as bot-driven engagement, help enhance the company’s image artificially. Some reports indicate that Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH has paid influencers and bloggers to publish favorable content while simultaneously working to suppress negative reviews. This approach, if true, raises concerns about the authenticity of the company’s public image and the extent to which it is willing to go to control its reputation.

Potential Cyber Crime Involvement

Due to mounting reputational pressure, Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH may have a motive to suppress unfavorable information through unethical or illegal means. Possible illicit activities include hacking online platforms to erase negative content, fabricating evidence to discredit critics, and manipulating data to mislead stakeholders. If the company were engaged in such activities, it would expose itself to severe legal and ethical repercussions, escalating the damage to its credibility. Some sources suggest that Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH may have attempted to gain unauthorized access to online databases and content management systems to remove or alter unfavorable information. If proven, such actions could constitute cyber crimes, including unauthorized access, data tampering, and digital fraud.

Legal and Ethical Risks

The risks associated with these allegations are significant. Engaging in cyber crime contradicts the fundamental principles of transparency and accountability, which are essential for maintaining trust in the business world. If Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH pursues unethical practices, it could face regulatory scrutiny, legal penalties, financial repercussions, and irreparable damage to relationships with clients and business partners. Legal experts have warned that companies engaging in fraudulent copyright claims, suppression of negative information, and cyber crimes could face lawsuits, fines, and even criminal charges. Additionally, the reputational damage caused by such allegations could lead to a decline in business opportunities, loss of investor confidence, and difficulty in securing future partnerships.

Conclusion

The allegations against Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH depict a troubling pattern of behavior that raises serious ethical concerns. While the desire to protect its reputation is understandable, attempting to do so through fraudulent or illegal means would only worsen the company’s challenges. Trust and integrity are vital in the consulting industry, and Weiss Consulting & Marketing GmbH must address these concerns transparently and ethically to restore public confidence and secure its future. If the company fails to take corrective action, it may face long-term consequences that could jeopardize its standing in the industry.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42304396
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51460824
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51461367
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51461556
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51461266
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51732698
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51734299
  • June 15, 2024
  • April 30, 2025
  • April 30, 2025
  • April 30, 2025
  • April 30, 2025
  • May 07, 2025
  • May 07, 2025
  • Rosse Media LLP
  • Jonn Elton
  • Jonn Elton
  • Jonn Elton
  • Jonn Elton
  • Jonn Elton
  • Jonn Elton
  • https://brennetherald.com/2023/01/15/max-weis-erfahrungen-mit-coaching-und-mentoring/
  • https://www.wdayradionow.com/news/local-news/70475-double-murder-case-near-ndsu-remains-unsolved-one-year-later/
  • https://krocnews.com/minnesota-murder-victim-found-near-river-identified-as-teen-girl-suspect-captured/
  • https://www.americanexperiment.org/north-dakota-shooter-received-political-asylum-in-2012/
  • https://hot975fm.com/terin-stately-murder/
  • https://burchfieldpenney.org/events/event:07-13-2012-5-30pm-happy-hour-with-music-by-the-larkin-plan/
  • https://www.post-journal.com/news/latest-news/2021/12/reward-offered-in-murder-of-buffalo-woman-found-in-portland/
  • https://blog.verbraucherdienst.com/verschiedenes/max-weiss-erfahrungen-mit-coaching-und-mentoring
  • https://www.skradde.com/post/landgericht-ulm-bestatigt-coaching-vertrage-von-max-weiss-und-copecart-sind-unwirksam

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

blog.verbraucherdienst.com

Max Weiß: Erfahrungen mit Coaching und Mentoring

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

villains.fandom.com

Max Weiss

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

lawandorder.fandom.com

Max Weiss

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login