CyberCriminal.com

Michael Matlin

We are investigating Michael Matlin for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Michael Matlin

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 21 Nov 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7832/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Mar 2025

Michael Matlin
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Michael Matlin in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Michael Matlin over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Michael Matlin - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Michael Matlin presents an unusual case in the world of high finance and business dealings. In an era where scrutiny is relentless and digital footprints are nearly impossible to erase, his name remains remarkably untainted—almost suspiciously so. As an investigative journalist, I set out to uncover the truth behind Matlin and his associated entities, only to find a conspicuous void where red flags and adverse media should exist. Is this the mark of an impeccably clean record, or is there a calculated effort to control the narrative? The deeper I dug, the more it seemed that censorship, rather than coincidence, might be at play.

The Enigma of Michael Matlin

In today’s digital age, it’s rare to come across a figure involved in significant ventures without leaving a trace of controversy or criticism. Yet, Michael Matlin appears to be an exception. Public records, news articles, and online platforms reveal little to no adverse information about him or his business dealings. This absence raises questions: Is Matlin exceptionally adept at maintaining a pristine public image, or is there a deliberate effort to suppress unfavorable information?

The Censorship Conundrum

The notion of a “Censorship Industrial Complex” has gained traction in recent years, highlighting how information can be controlled or obscured by powerful entities. Testimonies before the U.S. House of Representatives have shed light on the mechanisms through which information is managed, often under the guise of preventing misinformation . Could it be that Matlin or his affiliates are leveraging such mechanisms to ensure that only favorable narratives prevail?

A Call for Transparency

While the lack of adverse information might suggest an unblemished record, it is also essential for potential investors and the public to exercise due diligence. Transparency is the bedrock of trust in any professional relationship. The scarcity of information on Michael Matlin should prompt stakeholders to seek clarity and ensure that their engagements are based on comprehensive and accurate data.

Conclusion

The case of Michael Matlin serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding information availability in our modern era. Whether the absence of adverse media is a testament to his impeccable conduct or a result of strategic information management remains an open question. As always, vigilance and a commitment to uncovering the truth are paramount.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46526032
  •  
  • Stacy LLC
  • https://mynews13.com/fl/orlando/news/2012/11/29/orlando_man_dies_fro
  • https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/19/business/sec-concord-abramovich.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

NY Times

Regulators Charge Money Manager Tied to Russian Oligarch

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

SEC GOV

SEC Charges New York Firm Concord Management and Owner with Acting as Unregistered Investment Advisers to Billionaire Former Russian Official

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Reuters

US SEC charges investment firm linked to Russian billionaire

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login