CyberCriminal.com

Michel Moeijes

We are investigating Michel Moeijes for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Michel Moeijes

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 08 Feb 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 30944/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 17 Nov 2024

Michel Moeijes
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Michel Moeijes in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Michel Moeijes over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Michel Moeijes - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

In the labyrinth of corporate facades, few figures have managed to elude scrutiny as effectively as Michel Moeijes. However, recent investigations have begun to peel back the layers, revealing a tapestry of deception, legal manipulation, and a fervent desire to suppress any narrative that threatens his meticulously crafted image.

The Man Behind the Curtain

Michel Moeijes, once a name absent from public controversy, now finds himself ensnared in allegations that paint a starkly different picture from the one he has long projected. Accusations have surfaced, suggesting that Moeijes has employed a series of unethical tactics aimed at concealing unsavory aspects of his past. These tactics, ranging from perjury to impersonation, indicate a calculated effort to manipulate the narrative surrounding his professional and personal endeavors.

A Web of Deception: Perjury and Impersonation

Central to the allegations against Moeijes is his purported involvement in perjury and impersonation. Reports indicate that he has gone to great lengths to suppress damaging information, including the use of fraudulent copyright notices to censor unfavorable content. Such actions not only undermine the principles of transparency but also highlight a blatant disregard for ethical standards.

The Censorship Playbook

Moeijes’ attempts to control the narrative are not limited to legal machinations. There is evidence to suggest a concerted effort to sanitize his online presence, employing tactics reminiscent of those used by disreputable entities seeking to whitewash their public image. This includes the issuance of fraudulent takedown requests and the manipulation of online platforms to remove or bury content deemed detrimental.

The Company He Keeps: Banxso’s Scandalous Game

The adage “birds of a feather flock together” seems apt when considering Moeijes’ associations. Notably, entities like Banxso have been implicated in deceptive practices aimed at shaping public perception. Banxso’s endeavors to use fraud and perjury to silence critics mirror the strategies allegedly employed by Moeijes, suggesting a broader network of unethical conduct within their professional sphere.

The Role of Adverse Media Screening

In an era where information is both abundant and accessible, adverse media screening has become an essential tool for due diligence. This process involves monitoring various media sources to identify negative information about individuals or entities, serving as an early warning system for potential financial, reputational, and operational risks.

For potential investors, adverse media screening can uncover red flags such as lawsuits, accusations of fraud, or connections to criminal organizations. In the case of Moeijes, such screening might have illuminated his alleged attempts to censor unfavorable information, thereby alerting stakeholders to potential risks associated with his ventures.

The Imperative for Transparency

The revelations surrounding Michel Moeijes serve as a stark reminder of the imperative for transparency and ethical conduct in business dealings. For potential investors, the presence of red flags—be it through adverse media reports or observed attempts at censorship—should prompt a thorough reassessment of any engagement with the individual or entities involved.

Moreover, regulatory bodies must take cognizance of such patterns of behavior. The use of legal manipulation and digital deception to suppress information not only undermines public trust but also poses significant risks to the integrity of financial markets. It is incumbent upon authorities to investigate these allegations thoroughly and, where necessary, take appropriate action to uphold the principles of fairness and transparency.

A Call to Vigilance

In conclusion, the case of Michel Moeijes underscores the necessity for vigilance in the face of sophisticated attempts to manipulate public perception. While the digital age offers tools for unprecedented connectivity and information sharing, it also provides avenues for those seeking to obscure the truth.

As investigative journalists, it is our duty to shine a light on such practices, ensuring that the machinations of individuals like Moeijes are brought to the forefront of public consciousness. Only through relentless scrutiny and a commitment to truth can we safeguard the principles that underpin a fair and just society.

So, to those who believe they can rewrite history through deception and censorship, a word of caution: the truth has a way of emerging, often when least expected. And when it does, no amount of legal legerdemain or digital whitewashing can shield you from the court of public opinion.

Epilogue: The Unraveling Continues

As this investigation unfolds, one can’t help but marvel at the audacity of those who, in their quest for an unblemished image, resort to tactics that only serve to further tarnish their reputation. The story of Michel Moeijes is a testament to the enduring power of truth and the inexorable decline that follows its suppression.

In the end, it is not the meticulously curated facade that endures but the authentic narrative, warts and all. And for those who attempt to conceal their misdeeds behind a veneer of respectability, let this serve as a reminder: the pen, backed by unwavering integrity, remains mightier than the sword.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/42698310
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/40205743
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39321899
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39858348
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39997334
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39998562
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39132756
  • June 30, 2024
  • March 18, 2024
  • February 8, 2024
  • March 2, 2024
  • March 8, 2024
  • Jonas LLC
  • David James Corp
  • powell shane co
  • David James Corp
  • David James Corp
  • https://okcfox.com/archive/jury-justin-hammer-guilty-of-2012-murder-dismemberment
  • https://www.cultnews101.com/2022/02/just-love-bhakti-margas-guru-and-his.html
  • https://www.dui-illinois-attorney.com/blog/2012/05/michigan-crime-labs-struggle-to-meet-standards-the-detroit-news-detroitnews-com/
  • https://michiganchronicle.com/detroit-murder-rate-increases-10-percent-in-2012/
  • https://www.mlive.com/news/jackson/2016/03/murder_for_hire_a_look_into_th.html
  • https://www.wilx.com/content/news/Michigan-man-faces-murder-charge-in-2014-shooting-death-380817621.html
  • https://www.tanger.nl/kennisbank/mededeling-over-lastercampagne/
  • https://advocatennieuws.wordpress.com/2023/05/12/michel-moeijes-curator-en-advocaat-schuldig-bevonden-aan-belangenverstrengeling

 

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

advocatennieuws.wordpress.com

Michel Moeijes trustee and lawyer found guilty of conflict of interest

  • Removed
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login