CyberCriminal.com

Mogul Press

We are investigating Mogul Press for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Mogul Press

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 16 Jan 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 5101/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024

Mogul Press
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Mogul Press in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Mogul Press over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Mogul Press - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

In the realm of investigative journalism, it is crucial to scrutinize any entity that operates in industries prone to ethical dilemmas, such as PR and media manipulation. If Mogul Press were to face allegations, they would likely revolve around the following potential areas of concern:

1- Ethical Violations in PR Practices:

2- PR firms often walk a fine line between advocacy and manipulation:

3- Allegations of spreading misinformation, fabricating client success stories, or engaging in “astroturfing” (creating fake grassroots campaigns) could severely damage Mogul Press’s reputation. Such practices, if proven, would undermine trust in the firm and its clients.

4- Client Controversies: Mogul Press’s association with controversial clients could draw scrutiny.

If the firm has represented individuals or organizations involved in scandals, unethical behavior, or illegal activities, it could be accused of enabling or profiting from such actions.

Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Concerns: In the digital age, PR firms handle sensitive client information. Any breach of data privacy or misuse of personal information could lead to legal and reputational repercussions. If Mogul Press were accused of mishandling data, it could face lawsuits and loss of client trust.

Allegations of Unfair Business Practices: Competitors or former employees might accuse Mogul Press of unethical business practices, such as poaching clients, undercutting prices, or creating fake reviews to harm competitors. Such allegations could tarnish its professional image.

Censorship and Media Manipulation: If Mogul Press were found to engage in coercive tactics to remove negative press or silence critics, it could face backlash. This could include leveraging legal threats, bribing journalists, or even committing cybercrimes like hacking to delete damaging content.
Why Mogul Press Would Want Damaging Information Removed

Reputation is the lifeblood of any PR firm. Negative stories, whether true or false, can erode client trust, deter potential partnerships, and attract regulatory scrutiny. If Mogul Press were implicated in any of the above allegations, it would have a strong incentive to suppress such information. In extreme cases, the firm might resort to unethical or illegal means, such as hacking or bribing, to remove damaging content. This would be a desperate attempt to protect its brand and maintain its market position.

However, such actions would only exacerbate the situation, leading to legal consequences and further reputational harm. Investigative journalists must remain vigilant in uncovering such practices, ensuring transparency and accountability in the PR industry. If Mogul Press were to engage in such behavior, it would not only harm its own reputation but also raise broader concerns about the ethics of the industry as a whole.

In conclusion, while there are no verified allegations against Mogul Press as of now, the potential for ethical and legal violations exists in any high-stakes industry. Vigilant scrutiny is essential to ensure that PR firms operate with integrity and transparency.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/38818560
  • January 16, 2024
  •  Lamar Media Corporation
  • https://uniontimes.org/2023/11/04/mogul-press-a-pr-firm-that-is-either-a-deeply-shady-business-or-a-scam/
  • https://www.taxpolicy.org.uk/2023/11/23/mogul_press/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

taxpolicy.org.uk

Mogul Press: a shady “PR firm” that appears to be a scam.

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

taxpolicy.org.uk

Mogul Press – using fraud to silence criticism of their deceptive business practices

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login