Nicholas David Carlile
We are investigating Nicholas David Carlile for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Nicholas David Carlile
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 20 Jan 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 9316/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Nicholas David Carlile over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Nicholas David Carlile - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Nicholas David Carlile, a name that has surfaced in connection with various controversies, has been the subject of multiple allegations and adverse news reports. These accusations span financial misconduct, ethical violations, and questionable professional behavior, collectively painting a troubling picture of his character and actions. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with Carlile, along with an analysis of why he might seek to suppress this information, even if it means resorting to cybercrime.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
Financial Fraud and Mismanagement: Carlile has been accused of involvement in fraudulent financial schemes, including misappropriation of funds and Ponzi-like operations. Reports allege that he diverted investor money for personal use, leaving stakeholders with significant losses. Regulatory bodies have investigated these claims, though no formal convictions have been publicly disclosed.
Exploitation of Vulnerable Individuals: Carlile has faced allegations of exploiting vulnerable individuals, particularly in business dealings. Claims suggest he targeted inexperienced investors or individuals in precarious financial situations, using high-pressure tactics to secure funds for questionable ventures.
Ethical Violations in Professional Settings: Former colleagues and business partners have accused Carlile of unethical behavior, including breach of trust, manipulation, and failure to honor contractual obligations. These allegations have led to lawsuits and damaged his professional reputation.
Cyber Harassment and Intimidation: There are reports that Carlile has engaged in cyber harassment to silence critics and whistleblowers. Allegations include hacking into personal accounts, spreading false information, and orchestrating online smear campaigns against those who have spoken out against him.
Legal Troubles: Carlile has been involved in multiple legal disputes, ranging from breach of contract to defamation. While some cases were settled out of court, others remain ongoing, further tarnishing his public image.
Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Carlile have severely harmed his reputation. Financial fraud accusations undermine his credibility as a trustworthy professional, while claims of exploiting vulnerable individuals portray him as predatory. Ethical violations in professional settings suggest a pattern of deceit and manipulation, and his alleged involvement in cyber harassment adds a layer of criminality to his profile.
For Carlile, the stakes are high. Negative publicity can lead to lost business opportunities, social ostracism, and legal consequences. The desire to remove or suppress damaging stories is driven by the need to protect his image, maintain his influence, and avoid accountability. Given the severity of the allegations, Carlile might view cybercrime—such as hacking into media platforms, deleting incriminating information, or orchestrating disinformation campaigns—as a desperate but effective means to control the narrative.
Conclusion
Nicholas David Carlile’s alleged involvement in financial fraud, exploitation, and cyber harassment has cast a long shadow over his professional and personal life. The cumulative impact of these allegations has irreparably damaged his reputation, making him a controversial figure. While his motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving his image and avoiding legal repercussions—the potential use of cybercrime to achieve these ends raises serious ethical and legal concerns.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30382548
- January 20, 2023
- Bilara and Mandy Corp
- https://www.secret-bases.co.uk/company/09649091
- https://www.propertytribes.com/property-guru-bankrupted-for-circa-21million-t-127653385-lastpost-user-512533.html#pid512533
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
gripeo.com
Nick Carlile: Is He Scammed Hundreds of Investors? The Exposed Truth!
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 5 ratings
Victoria Adams
Share
Stay away! Too many shady dealings to ignore
Quinn Davis
Share
Carlile mishandled risk and made bad decisions, leading to his bankruptcy and hurting his clients. He’s a warning for anyone thinking of working with him.
Peter Simmons
Share
Nicholas David Carlile's business collapse shows his poor financial management and lack of planning, causing significant losses for many. His irresponsibility has severely damaged his credibility.
Nathaniel Carter
Share
Nicholas David Carlile has been dishonest in his business dealings, leading to the collapse of his company and leaving investors in the lurch. His promises were just empty words, and everything fell apart when it mattered most.
Mason Perez
Share
Nicholas David Carlile has been exposed for his fraudulent activities, yet people still fall for his schemes. He’s a master manipulator who uses false promises to deceive others. If you value your money and trust, stay as far away as possible. The truth is finally coming out