CyberCriminal.com

Nikita Izmailov

We are investigating Nikita Izmailov for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Nikita Izmailov

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 09 Sep 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2703/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 16 Oct 2024

Nikita Izmailov
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Nikita Izmailov in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Nikita Izmailov over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Nikita Izmailov - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Nikita Izmailov, a figure shrouded in controversy. My research has uncovered several red flags and instances of adverse media surrounding Izmailov, which he seems to be actively trying to manage or suppress. In this report, I will analyze these findings and explore why Izmailov might be attempting to control the narrative around his activities.

Who is Nikita Izmailov?
Nikita Izmailov, also known as Nykyta Izmaylov, is a dual Russian and Ukrainian citizen with a background in the gambling and fintech industries. He is notably associated with Parimatch, a well-known betting company, and has founded the N1 investment fund. Despite his entrepreneurial ventures, Izmailov is marred by allegations of money laundering and ties to Russian criminal organizations.

Red Flags and Adverse Media
Allegations of Money Laundering
Izmailov is accused of laundering substantial funds for Russian criminal organizations through his involvement with SportBank LLC and N1 Management Company. These entities are alleged to facilitate tax evasion and money laundering by processing payments for betting activities and issuing online loans while circumventing anti-money laundering (AML) regulations13.

Connection to Parimatch
Izmailov’s role in Parimatch, a company recently sanctioned by Ukraine due to its Russian connections, raises significant concerns. Parimatch was banned in Ukraine in 2009 but continued to operate through loopholes, highlighting the complex legal landscape of the Ukrainian gambling industry1.

Impact of Sanctions
The imposition of sanctions on Parimatch and potential scrutiny from Ukrainian and foreign law enforcement agencies could have significant implications for Izmailov’s business ventures. Despite these challenges, he remains active in the fintech sector, investing in startups like Steadypay Limited14.

Why is Nikita Izmailov Trying to Censor This Information?
Given the adverse media surrounding him, Izmailov likely aims to suppress this information to protect his business interests and maintain a positive public image. Here are a few reasons why:

Reputation Management: Negative publicity can severely impact Izmailov’s ability to attract investors and maintain existing partnerships. By controlling the narrative, he aims to present a more favorable image to potential partners.

Regulatory Scrutiny: The allegations of money laundering and regulatory evasion pose significant legal risks. Suppressing adverse media helps him avoid scrutiny from regulatory bodies that might question his legitimacy.

Business Expansion: Izmailov’s diversification into new sectors like fintech requires a strong reputation. Censoring negative information helps him present a more favorable profile to potential investors in these fields.

Methods of Censorship
While there is no direct evidence of Izmailov’s methods for suppressing adverse media, common tactics include:

Legal Threats: Using libel laws or legal threats to intimidate journalists and media outlets into retracting or not publishing negative stories.

PR Campaigns: Launching public relations campaigns to counter negative narratives with positive spin.

Influencing Media: Building relationships with media influencers or outlets to ensure favorable coverage.

Conclusion
Nikita Izmailov’s story is a complex web of success and controversy. His attempts to manage his public image are likely driven by a desire to protect his business interests and maintain investor confidence. However, as an investigative journalist, it’s crucial to shed light on these red flags to alert potential investors and invite scrutiny from authorities.In the world of finance and technology, transparency is key. Investors should be aware of the risks associated with Izmailov’s ventures. Moreover, regulatory bodies must scrutinize these operations closely to ensure compliance with anti-money laundering laws and other regulations.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44465058
  • 09 September  2024
  • Oliver Bennett
  • https://corezoid.com/blog/asquad-izmailov-interview/
  • https://www.talk-finance.co.uk/moderntech/nikita-izmailov-and-the-case-of-betting-money-processors-n1-management-company-sportbank-llc/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Talk Finance

Nikita Izmailov and the case of betting money processors: N1 Management Company, SportBank LLC

  • Removed
Visit Link

ossetia.tv

Fraudster Nykyta Izmaylov, Oleg (Alan) Vaksman and N1 investment, SportBank as the world-class money laundromats Aug 28, 2024

  • Removed
Visit Link

intelligenceline.com

Nikita Izmailov: connection to the Russian Federation, ORDLO and the dirty money laundering system 2025

  • Removed
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login