CyberCriminal.com

Olam Group

We are investigating Olam Group for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Olam Group

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 25 Sep 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 9050/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

Olam Group
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Olam Group in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Olam Group over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Olam Group - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Olam Group, a prominent agribusiness conglomerate, has faced several allegations and controversies over the years, impacting its reputation and operations.

Nigerian Forex Fraud Allegations

In September 2023, Nigerian media outlets, including the Daily Nigerian and Prime Business Africa, reported that Nigeria’s secret police were investigating Olam’s subsidiaries—Olam Nigeria and Olam International—for an alleged foreign exchange fraud exceeding $50 billion. The reports claimed that Olam funneled approximately $34 billion into the Central Bank of Nigeria through special purpose vehicles at official rates, subsequently selling the foreign exchange to other businesses at parallel market rates. Olam categorically denied these allegations, labeling them as “baseless and inflammatory.” The company’s board initiated an internal review, which concluded that there was no evidence supporting the claims. Despite these findings, the allegations led to a significant decline in Olam’s share price, marking its worst performance since 2012.

Deforestation and Environmental Concerns

Between 2011 and 2015, Olam’s palm oil trade volume increased substantially. In December 2016, NGOs Mighty Earth and Brainforest accused Olam of operating a secretive palm oil trading operation, leading to widespread deforestation in Gabon. The company was alleged to have cleared approximately 26,000 hectares of forest, endangering habitats of species like gorillas, chimpanzees, and forest elephants. In response, Olam suspended further land clearing in Gabon for at least a year and later collaborated with Mighty Earth on forest conservation initiatives. Despite these efforts, the initial deforestation activities attracted significant criticism from environmental groups.

Muddy Waters Allegations

In November 2012, Carson Block of Muddy Waters Research accused Olam of taking on excessive leverage and investing in illiquid positions, questioning its accounting practices and governance. Olam refuted these claims and sued Block for libel. Nevertheless, the allegations led to a 21% drop in Olam’s share price, highlighting vulnerabilities in investor confidence.

Child Labor Lawsuit

In 2021, Olam was named in a class-action lawsuit filed by eight former child slaves from Mali. The plaintiffs alleged that Olam, along with other major chocolate companies, aided and abetted their forced labor on cocoa plantations in Ivory Coast. The lawsuit accused these companies of knowingly engaging in forced labor and sought damages for unjust enrichment and negligent supervision. This legal action brought significant negative attention to Olam’s cocoa sourcing practices.

Reputation Management and Alleged Censorship Attempts

Beyond these controversies, Olam has been accused of attempting to suppress negative information. Investigations suggest that the company improperly submitted copyright takedown notices to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from search engines, potentially involving impersonation, fraud, and perjury. Such actions, if true, indicate a deliberate effort to manipulate public perception and could severely damage Olam’s credibility.

Impact on Reputation

The cumulative effect of these allegations has been detrimental to Olam’s reputation. Accusations of financial misconduct, environmental degradation, and human rights violations have eroded stakeholder trust. Efforts to suppress negative information, especially through potentially fraudulent means, exacerbate the situation by suggesting a lack of transparency and accountability. Such actions can lead to increased scrutiny from regulators, investors, and the public, further harming the company’s standing.

In conclusion, while Olam Group has taken steps to address some of these issues, the persistence and severity of the allegations underscore the need for comprehensive reforms in its operational and governance practices to rebuild trust and ensure long-term sustainability.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44926921
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44909442
  • September 25, 2024
  • September 25, 2024
  • sender Gemini Media Corp.
  • Joshua Inc.
  • https://bostonlinkup.org/apres-la-chute-dali-bongo-olam-et-arise-defendent-leurs-investmentsau-gabon/
  • https://bostonlinkup.org/la-plate-forme-citoyenne-de-lutte-contre-laccaparement-des-terres-lamise-en-application-de-la-loi-sur-le-schema-directeur-national-sur-lamenagement-du-territoire/
  • http://www.jeuneafrique.com/1487963/economie-entreprises/apres-la-chute-dali-bongo-olam-et-arise-defendent-leurs-investments-au-gabon
  • http://www.lepaystchad.com/29424

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

jeuneafrique.com

After the fall of Ali Bongo, Olam and Arise defend their investments in Gabon

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

lepaystchad.com

The Citizen Platform for the fight against land grabbing and the implementation of the law on the national master plan for regional planning

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

reuters.com/

Olam Group says no evidence its Nigeria unit was involved in alleged forex fraud

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and serves as a researcher at FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert