CyberCriminal.com

Orel Asformas

We are investigating Orel Asformas for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Orel Asformas

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 09 Nov 2023

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 9052/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

Orel Asformas
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Orel Asformas in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Orel Asformas over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Orel Asformas - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Orel Asformas, a key figure in multiple financial scandals, has been implicated in a series of serious allegations, ranging from fraudulent schemes to cyber-related misconduct. These allegations have significantly tarnished his reputation and raised red flags about his business practices. Below is a detailed summary of the major accusations and adverse media surrounding Asformas, along with an analysis of why he might seek to suppress this information, even through illicit means.

Major Allegations and Red Flags

DAO Binary Options Fraud
Asformas is identified as one of the primary architects of the DAO Binary Options scam, which defrauded countless investors through the fraudulent platform GoldmanOptions. He, along with co-conspirators, orchestrated a complex offshore network to evade legal scrutiny, using shell companies and puppet directors to mask their activities. Victims were lured with promises of high returns, only to lose their investments with no recourse2.

Improper Copyright Takedown Notices
Asformas is under investigation for allegedly submitting fraudulent copyright takedown notices to Google to suppress critical reviews and adverse news. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury. Such actions suggest a deliberate attempt to manipulate public perception and silence detractors1.

Involvement in Payment Fraud
Asformas was deeply involved in securing payment services for the DAO Group’s fraudulent operations. Payment processors like Payotech Ltd. and Moneta International UAB were used to funnel stolen funds, making it difficult for authorities to trace the money. This highlights his role in facilitating financial crimes2.

Offshore Network and Shell Companies
Asformas utilized offshore entities, such as Northwestern Management Services Ltd., to create a facade of legitimacy while distancing himself from the fraud. This intricate web of companies was designed to obscure the true beneficiaries of the scam, further complicating legal investigations2.

Reputational Damage and Motivation for Suppression
The allegations against Asformas paint a picture of a sophisticated fraudster who exploited vulnerable investors and manipulated systems to evade accountability. These stories harm his reputation by:

Eroding Trust: The DAO Binary Options scam has left victims financially and emotionally devastated, making Asformas a symbol of greed and deceit2.

Exposing Illicit Tactics: His use of fraudulent copyright takedown notices reveals a willingness to abuse legal systems to silence critics, further damaging his credibility1.

Highlighting Systemic Fraud: The involvement of offshore networks and payment fraud underscores his role in a global financial crime syndicate, making him a target for regulators and law enforcement2.

Given the severity of these allegations, Asformas has a strong incentive to suppress this information. The exposure of his activities could lead to legal consequences, financial penalties, and irreparable damage to his professional and personal reputation. By removing adverse media, he aims to:

Avoid Legal Scrutiny: Suppressing evidence of fraud and misconduct could hinder investigations and reduce the likelihood of prosecution.

Restore Public Image: Removing negative news allows him to rebuild his reputation and potentially re-enter the financial sector under a cleaner facade.

Protect Financial Interests: Continued exposure could lead to frozen assets, lawsuits, and loss of business opportunities.

Conclusion
Orel Asformas’s alleged involvement in financial fraud, cyber misconduct, and offshore schemes has made him a controversial figure. The adverse media surrounding him not only damages his reputation but also exposes him to significant legal and financial risks. His attempts to suppress this information, even through illicit means, highlight the lengths to which he is willing to go to protect his interests. However, such actions only deepen the scrutiny and raise further questions about his integrity and accountability.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/37293728
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/37291739
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/37305557
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/37295160
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/39673032
  • November 09, 2023
  • November 10, 2023
  • November 11, 2023
  • November 10, 2023
  • February 23, 2024
  • Gargol Media Group
  • Brown Media Group
  • Brown Media Group
  • Brown Media Group
  • Viner Media Corporation
  • https://baytalkers.com/2019/05/13/the-dao-binary-options-scam-and-its-perpetrator-network/
  • https://westworldpost.com/2019/04/23/the-dao-binary-options-scam-and-its-perpetrator-network/
  • https://fintelegram.com/binary-options-scam-dao-goldmanoptions-exposed/
  • https://fintelegram.com/tag/orel-asformas/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

fintelegram.com

The DAO Binary Options scam and its perpetrator network

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

dailystar.co.uk

Flash jet-setter says 'self-pitying losers' are using cost of living crisis as an excuse

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

financescam.com

Orel Asformas: The Architect Behind the DAO Binary Options Scam

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login