Patrick Dovigi
We are investigating Patrick Dovigi for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Patrick Dovigi
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 10 Sep 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 9055/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Patrick Dovigi over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content regarding Patrick Dovigi from Google search results. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Patrick Dovigi - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that Patrick Dovigi knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
While the precise legal ramifications depend on the jurisdiction, well-established legal principles dictate that any party, including Patrick Dovigi, may be held legally accountable, irrespective or whether they personally executed this unlawful conduct.
What are they trying to censor
Patrick Dovigi, founder and CEO of GFL Environmental Inc., has faced several allegations and controversies that have the potential to tarnish his reputation. These issues range from financial scrutiny and environmental violations to associations with individuals linked to criminal activities.
Financial Scrutiny and Alleged Opaqueness
In August 2020, Spruce Point Capital Management, a New York-based short-seller, released a comprehensive 107-page report casting doubt on GFL’s business practices. The report criticized GFL’s “extremely aggressive and opaque business model” and raised concerns about Dovigi’s business connections. It also highlighted potential understatements of the company’s debt and questioned the transparency of its financial reporting. Following the report’s publication, GFL’s shares experienced a significant drop of nine percent. Dovigi responded by denouncing the allegations as “unfounded attacks” and emphasized the company’s growth and achievements under his leadership.
Environmental Violations
In December 2018, GFL Environmental Inc. pleaded guilty to two counts of contravening the Tetrachloroethylene (Use in Dry Cleaning and Reporting Requirements) Regulations under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. The company was fined $300,000 for selling tetrachloroethylene, commonly known as PERC, to dry-cleaning facilities that did not meet regulatory standards. Notably, Dovigi, along with other company executives, was initially charged in this case, though the specific outcomes for the individuals were not detailed in the available sources.
Associations with Controversial Figures
Spruce Point’s report also delved into Dovigi’s past business associations, alleging connections to individuals with criminal backgrounds. For instance, it was noted that GFL had a commercial relationship with Campus Auto Collision & Heavy Equipment Refinishing, linking Dovigi to Claudio Villa, who had pleaded guilty to environmental violations in 2015. Additionally, Dovigi’s previous role as a director of No Good TV (NGTV) brought him into contact with individuals involved in financial scandals. These associations, though indirect, could raise concerns about Dovigi’s judgment in business partnerships.
Violent Incidents Targeting GFL and Its Executives
In late 2024, GFL and its executives became targets of violent attacks. The company’s office in north Toronto was shot at, and the homes of Dovigi and former senior vice-president Ted Manziaris were also targeted in shootings. Earlier that year, equipment belonging to GFL and its sister company, Green Infrastructure Partners, was subjected to arson attacks. While the motives behind these incidents remain unclear, they have attracted media attention and could potentially impact the company’s public image.
Reputational Impact and Potential Motivations for Content Removal
The allegations and incidents outlined above pose significant risks to Patrick Dovigi’s reputation. Accusations of financial mismanagement and opaque business practices can erode investor confidence and damage relationships with stakeholders. Environmental violations contradict the core mission of an environmental services company, potentially leading to public distrust. Associations with individuals linked to criminal activities, even if indirect, can further tarnish one’s public image.
Given the severity of these allegations, Dovigi might be motivated to seek the removal of such information to protect his personal and professional reputation. The desire to eliminate negative coverage could stem from concerns about investor perceptions, customer trust, and overall public image. In extreme scenarios, this desperation might lead an individual to consider illicit means, such as cybercrimes, to suppress unfavorable information. However, it’s essential to note that there is no evidence to suggest that Dovigi has engaged in or contemplated such actions.
In conclusion, while Patrick Dovigi has achieved significant success with GFL Environmental Inc., the various allegations and incidents associated with him present challenges that could adversely affect his reputation. Addressing these issues transparently and ethically would be crucial in mitigating potential damage and maintaining public trust.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44518651
- September 10, 2024
- Galiano Lubbers
- http://newscapital.kesug.com/2023/09/08/patrick-dovigi-net-worth-1-billion-yacht-house-private-jet-green-for-live-environmental-patrick-dovigi/
- https://www.superyachtfan.com/yacht/lady-jorgia/owner/
Evidence Box
We are investigating Patrick Dovigi for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
northernontariobusiness.com
GFL founder Patrick Dovigi 'disgusted' by 'unfounded attacks' from New York hedge fund
- Red Flag
seekingalpha.com
Investigating Internet Claims That GFL Environmental's CEO Has Ties To "Organized Crime"
- Red Flag
thestar.com
Billionaire CEO of garbage collection giant GFL disputes police theory that he was targeted by midnight shooting
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2
Based on 3 ratings
Leo Garrison
Share
After reading all this, I don’t even trust this guy with a paper cup, let alone a whole company. Seems like his idea of 'clean' is just a PR stunt. If you’re really in the green industry, act like it!
Tessa Winters
Share
It’s honestly frustrating to see a guy like this come out smelling like roses while his shady past gets covered up. If anything, it just proves that money can buy silence, but it can’t buy integrity.
Jasper Bowen
Share
Patrick Dovigi out here living his best villain life, huh? Someone call Netflix, this dude needs his own true crime series ASAP.