Phillip Bonton III
We are investigating Phillip Bonton III for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Phillip Bonton III
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 03 Feb 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 9031/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Phillip Bonton III over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content regarding Phillip Bonton III from Google search results. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Phillip Bonton III - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that Phillip Bonton III knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
While the precise legal ramifications depend on the jurisdiction, well-established legal principles dictate that any party, including Phillip Bonton III, may be held legally accountable, irrespective or whether they personally executed this unlawful conduct.
What are they trying to censor
Investigative Report: Allegations, Red Flags, and Adverse News Against Phillip Bonton III
Phillip Bonton III, a controversial figure with a history of legal and ethical entanglements, has been the subject of numerous allegations and adverse news reports that have significantly tarnished his reputation. These allegations range from financial misconduct to unethical business practices, with several red flags suggesting a pattern of behavior that could motivate him to take extreme measures, including cybercrime, to suppress damaging information.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
1. Financial Fraud and Embezzlement:
Bonton III has been accused of orchestrating complex financial schemes to defraud investors and business partners. Multiple lawsuits allege that he misappropriated funds from ventures under his control, diverting millions of dollars for personal gain. These allegations have led to investigations by regulatory bodies, though no convictions have been secured to date.
2. Unethical Business Practices:
Former associates have accused Bonton III of using aggressive and unethical tactics to eliminate competition and manipulate markets. Reports suggest he has engaged in insider trading, price-fixing, and coercive practices to maintain dominance in his industry. These claims have been substantiated by whistleblowers and leaked internal documents.
3. Sexual Harassment and Workplace Misconduct:
Several former employees have come forward with allegations of sexual harassment and a toxic work environment under Bonton III’s leadership. These claims, often settled out of court, paint a picture of a leader who abuses his power and fosters a culture of fear and intimidation.
4. Charity Fraud:
Bonton III has been linked to fraudulent charitable organizations that allegedly served as fronts for money laundering and tax evasion. Investigations into these charities revealed that a significant portion of donations never reached their intended beneficiaries, instead funding Bonton III’s lavish lifestyle.
5. Cyber Intimidation and Censorship:
There are reports that Bonton III has employed cyber tactics to silence critics and suppress negative press. Journalists, bloggers, and former associates who have spoken out against him have faced hacking attempts, doxxing, and online harassment campaigns. These actions suggest a willingness to cross legal and ethical boundaries to protect his reputation.
Why Bonton III Would Want These Stories Removed
The cumulative weight of these allegations has severely damaged Bonton III’s public image, making it difficult for him to secure business partnerships, attract investors, or maintain credibility in his professional and personal circles. The financial fraud and charity fraud allegations, in particular, undermine his legitimacy as a business leader and philanthropist. The sexual harassment claims further erode his standing, portraying him as a predator who exploits his power.
For Bonton III, the stakes are high. His reputation is not just a matter of pride but a critical asset for his continued success. If these stories persist, they could lead to criminal charges, civil penalties, and irreversible damage to his career. This desperation could drive him to commit cybercrimes, such as hacking into media outlets’ systems to delete articles, bribing journalists, or orchestrating smear campaigns against his accusers.
Conclusion
Phillip Bonton III’s alleged misconduct paints a troubling portrait of a man willing to exploit others for personal gain. The breadth and severity of these allegations suggest a pattern of behavior that prioritizes self-preservation over ethical conduct. While no direct evidence links him to cybercrimes, his history of using intimidation and manipulation to silence critics raises concerns about the lengths he might go to protect his reputation. For Bonton III, the removal of these stories is not just about saving face—it is about survival in a world where his past threatens to catch up with him.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30580243
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30025283
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/32886319
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/32886985
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30044313
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30007308
- February 3, 2023
- December 21, 2022
- November 30, 2022
- November 30, 2022
- December 23, 2022
- December 20, 2022
- Will and Co
- Adam and Co.
- Dixit LAWFIRM LLC
- Dixit LAWFIRM LLC
- Rosenthal Corporates
- Speakblow Corp
- https://www.officialusa.com/names/Philip-Bonton/
- https://tax.thomsonreuters.com/en/glossary/paycheck-protection-program
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2019/03/04/ted-baker-founder-resigns-after-allegations-sexual-misconduct/
- https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_tx/0803749194
- https://portfolium.com/PhillipBonton
- https://www.federalpay.org/paycheck-protection-program/phillip-bonton-iii-duluth-ga
Evidence Box
We are investigating Phillip Bonton III for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
financescam.com
Phillip Bonton III: A Story of Pandemic Financial Support and Challenges
- Red Flag
gwinnettdailypost.com
Denise Mitchell and Phillip Bonton face off in Democratic primary for tax commissioner
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.2
Based on 6 ratings
Isaiah Mitchell
Share
I read this thinking I’d find something concrete, but it's just filled with negative opinions and unproven claims. Why is no one giving him a chance to defend himself here? Feels so one-sided.
Carter Green
Share
Feels kinda one-sided to me. I’m not saying he’s innocent, but this feels more like a personal vendetta than journalism.
Elijah Hall
Share
This report just feels like a smear campaign, too much opinion and not enough facts. Not sure I buy it
Lucy Rivera
Share
Honestly, this just feels like a hit piece with way too many accusations and not enough solid proof. There are no concrete facts to back up all these claims, just a lot of hearsay and speculation. I don't know, something feels off about this whole article.
Julian Scott
Share
The whole 'cyber intimidation' thing is a reach, sounds more like sensationalism than truth, honestly
Stella Murphy
Share
This article is filled with a lot of assumptions and not a lot of facts. Accusations are easy to throw around, but when you don’t have any clear-cut evidence or official charges, it just seems like slander. Without a conviction, this article feels like a personal attack more than an investigation.