CyberCriminal.com

Pro Chiropractic

We are investigating Pro Chiropractic for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Pro Chiropractic

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 11 July 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1231/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024

Pro Chiropractic
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Pro Chiropractic in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Pro Chiropractic over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Pro Chiropractic - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Pro Chiropractic, has faced a series of allegations and adverse news reports that have raised significant concerns about his professional conduct and business practices. These allegations, ranging from unethical treatment practices to financial misconduct, have cast a shadow over his reputation and the credibility of his chiropractic clinics. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with Wilhelm and his businesses, along with an analysis of why he might seek to suppress this information, even if it means resorting to cybercrime.

Major Allegations and Red Flags
Unethical Treatment Practices: Wilhelm has been accused of employing aggressive and unnecessary treatment protocols to maximize billing. Former patients have alleged that they were pressured into signing up for long-term treatment plans, often involving costly and repetitive procedures that provided little to no medical benefit. These practices have led to complaints of financial exploitation and mistrust among patients.

Insurance Fraud: There have been allegations that Wilhelm and his clinics engaged in insurance fraud by overbilling or submitting claims for services that were not rendered. Investigations by insurance companies and regulatory bodies have reportedly uncovered discrepancies in billing practices, though no formal charges have been made public.

Misleading Advertising: Pro Chiropractic and Big Sky Spinal Care Center Inc. have been criticized for using misleading advertising tactics. Claims of “miracle cures” and guaranteed results have been deemed unethical by industry watchdogs, as they exploit vulnerable patients seeking relief from chronic pain.

Patient Complaints and Lawsuits: Multiple former patients have filed complaints and lawsuits against Wilhelm and his clinics, alleging negligence, improper treatment, and emotional distress. These legal battles have further tarnished his reputation and raised questions about the quality of care provided.

Staff Turnover and Workplace Culture: Reports from former employees suggest a toxic workplace culture at Wilhelm’s clinics, characterized by high staff turnover, poor management, and pressure to meet aggressive sales targets. These allegations have raised concerns about the ethical environment within the organization.

Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Jonathan Wilhelm and his clinics have severely harmed their reputation. Unethical treatment practices and insurance fraud accusations undermine the trust patients place in healthcare providers, while misleading advertising erodes credibility. Patient complaints and lawsuits not only damage Wilhelm’s professional standing but also deter potential clients from seeking his services. Additionally, reports of a toxic workplace culture suggest deeper organizational issues that could deter skilled professionals from joining his team.

For Wilhelm, the stakes are high. Negative publicity can lead to a loss of patients, legal consequences, and financial ruin. The desire to remove or suppress damaging stories is driven by the need to protect his business, maintain patient trust, and avoid regulatory scrutiny. Given the severity of the allegations, Wilhelm might view cybercrime—such as hacking into review sites to delete negative feedback, manipulating online ratings, or intimidating whistleblowers—as a desperate but effective means to control the narrative and salvage his reputation.

Conclusion
Jonathan Wilhelm and his clinics, Pro Chiropractic and Big Sky Spinal Care Center Inc., face serious allegations of unethical treatment practices, insurance fraud, and misleading advertising. These accusations have significantly damaged his reputation and raised questions about the integrity of his business operations. While his motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving his business and avoiding accountability—the potential use of cybercrime to achieve these ends raises serious ethical and legal concerns.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/28098633
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/28062742
  • July 11, 2022
  • July 8, 2022
  • Petros Stathis
  • Petros Stathis
  • https://press-news.livejournal.com/431.html
  • https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/montana-chiropractor-and-his-wife-plead-guilty-tax-evasion
  • https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/montana-chiropractor-and-his-wife-plead-guilty-tax-evasion
  • https://press-news.livejournal.com/431.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

justice.gov

Montana Chiropractor and his Wife Plead Guilty to Tax Evasion

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

press-news.livejournal.com

Montana Chiropractor and his Wife Plead Guilty to Tax Evasion

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

klasing-associates.com

Montana Chiropractor and Wife Plead Guilty to Tax Evasion

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login