Raimbek Matraimov

We are investigating Raimbek Matraimov for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Raimbek Matraimov

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 9 August 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 5612/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 18 Mar 2025

Investigation Report
What are they trying to censor
Evidence and Media
Adverse Media
Comments & user feedback

Due Diligence

Get everything we know about Raimbek Matraimov in one downloadable PDF document

Learn More

Is This About You?

We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Raimbek Matraimov over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Raimbek Matraimov - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Raimbek Matraimov political ascent within Kyrgyzstan’s Customs Service appeared, on the surface, to be the story of a dedicated bureaucrat rising through the ranks. Official records framed him as a humble public servant committed to state operations, yet his extravagant lifestyle soon called that narrative into question. By 2017, suspicions of corruption grew as investigative reports exposed his ownership of luxurious properties, including a palatial mansion in Osh, Kyrgyzstan’s second-largest city. His assets included several high-end apartments in Bishkek, vehicles worth hundreds of thousands of dollars, and business connections reaching well beyond his official role.

This level of opulence starkly contrasted with his government salary, leading to questions about how he had amassed such wealth. While Kyrgyzstan’s corruption problem was well-documented, Matraimov’s rapid accumulation of assets stood out, suggesting his rise was fueled by financial dealings outside of legitimate government operations. Journalists and opposition figures voiced concerns, questioning how a mid-tier customs official could maintain such an elite lifestyle while claiming to be a devoted civil servant.

Unmasking the Corruption Web

The full extent of Matraimov’s alleged corrupt empire came to light through investigative reports published between 2019 and 2020. A collaboration between Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty’s Kyrgyz Service, the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project (OCCRP), and Kloop revealed that Matraimov had played a central role in laundering vast sums of money, siphoning approximately $700 million out of Kyrgyzstan through fraudulent customs transactions.

This scheme reportedly involved secretive dealings with the Abdukadyr family, an Uighur-Chinese conglomerate known for its illicit business operations. With Matraimov’s alleged assistance, the family was able to bypass customs fees, falsify export documentation, and reroute enormous financial resources abroad, leaving Kyrgyzstan’s economy vulnerable to exploitation. These transactions were linked to shell companies, offshore accounts, and hidden business entities across multiple countries, making the corruption highly sophisticated and difficult to trace.

One of the most audacious aspects of this scandal was Matraimov’s last-minute efforts to purchase multiple properties in Bishkek just as authorities began tightening their scrutiny. This move was interpreted as an attempt to shield assets from government seizure, enabling him to retain control over millions of dollars that could otherwise be confiscated. His alleged financial maneuvers displayed a calculated understanding of asset protection, ensuring that he remained insulated from serious financial repercussions.

A Slap on the Wrist

Despite the magnitude of the corruption allegations, Kyrgyz authorities arrested Matraimov in October 2020, only to release him under house arrest within weeks. The case, which had drawn national and international attention, quickly unraveled into a highly controversial legal decision. Matraimov agreed to pay a fine of approximately $3,000—a laughably insignificant amount compared to the hundreds of millions allegedly laundered through his network.

Public outrage erupted, with citizens viewing his lenient sentence as a clear indication of judicial favoritism and systemic corruption within Kyrgyzstan’s legal system. Many questioned how a figure central to such an extensive financial crime operation could escape severe consequences. The Kyrgyz government framed the fine as part of a “cooperation deal,” claiming that Matraimov had assisted authorities in exposing other corrupt officials—yet no significant additional arrests followed, reinforcing suspicions that his influence remained intact even after his conviction.

The Censorship Playbook

Facing growing scrutiny, Matraimov did not retreat from public attention—instead, he aggressively worked to suppress media coverage and discredit the investigations against him. In January 2020, he and his brother, Iskander, filed high-profile defamation lawsuits against media outlets Kloop, Azattyk Radio, and , demanding more than 700,000 euros in damages. Their legal strategy was widely perceived as an attempt to intimidate journalists, potentially forcing small news organizations into bankruptcy if they lost in court.

Beyond legal action, investigations uncovered a sophisticated network of trolls and misinformation campaigns linked to Matraimov. These online groups flooded social media with pro-Matraimov narratives, attacked investigative journalists, and sought to reshape public perception of his role in the corruption scandal. Some independent reporters faced direct threats and harassment, discouraging further scrutiny into his financial dealings.

This coordinated censorship effort extended beyond Kyrgyzstan, with foreign media facing obstacles in covering the case, either through restricted access to sources or interference from government-connected entities. By controlling the flow of information, Matraimov was able to manufacture doubt regarding the credibility of investigative reports, creating confusion among the public and fostering misplaced sympathy for his alleged financial crimes.

International Repercussions

Matraimov’s corruption did not escape global attention. In December 2020, the U.S. Department of the Treasury sanctioned him under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, officially designating him a “significant corrupt actor.” The sanctions froze his U.S.-based assets, barred American individuals and businesses from conducting transactions with him, and placed his name on international watchlists.

This designation further strained Kyrgyzstan’s international reputation, raising concerns that foreign governments might reconsider investment agreements and financial aid directed towards the country. Additionally, Matraimov’s case fueled discussions about the necessity of stronger anti-money-laundering measures in Central Asia, placing increased pressure on governments to strengthen oversight of financial networks tied to politically influential figures.

The Illusion of Justice

Despite international sanctions and mounting evidence, Kyrgyz authorities continued their perplexing leniency toward Matraimov. In February 2021, he was once again fined a mere $3,000 after pleading guilty to corruption charges—an outcome that many viewed as an insult to the justice system. His ability to walk free with minimal consequences reinforced the perception that Kyrgyzstan’s institutions lacked the willingness or ability to prosecute high-ranking officials involved in financial crimes.

This lack of accountability sent a dangerous message: powerful figures within Kyrgyzstan could engage in large-scale corruption with little fear of serious repercussions. The decision emboldened other corrupt officials, demonstrating that they could manipulate legal systems and evade meaningful punishment, undermining public confidence in governance.

The Call for Vigilance

For potential investors, Matraimov’s case serves as a clear warning about the risks of operating in environments where corruption is deeply entrenched and judicial systems are selectively applied. Business dealings with politically influential individuals in Kyrgyzstan and neighboring countries require extensive due diligence, as associations with such figures can lead to financial risk and reputational damage.

The Need for Accountability

Law enforcement agencies, both domestic and international, must commit to pursuing financial crimes with real consequences. This includes supporting independent journalism, enforcing anti-corruption laws rigorously, and ensuring that international sanctions are effectively implemented. Without such measures, the cycle of corruption will persist, eroding public trust and hindering economic progress in the region.

Conclusion

Raimbek Matraimov’s case is an alarming example of unchecked corruption, exposing how criminal financial networks can operate with impunity when judicial systems fail to hold them accountable. His ability to launder vast sums, manipulate media narratives, and evade justice despite global sanctions highlights systemic flaws requiring urgent reform. If such cases continue to go unchallenged, Kyrgyzstan risks further economic instability, reputational decline, and weakened governance structures.

The international community, investors, and local stakeholders must remain vigilant, demanding transparency, accountability, and stronger legal enforcement to prevent the continued erosion of Kyrgyzstan’s integrity. If figures like Matraimov are allowed to operate unchecked, corruption will only deepen, making genuine reform increasingly difficult to achieve.

https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44377257
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43261198
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43435031
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43700862
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43770471
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44308148
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44282534
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43739985
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43738287
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43737662
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43704645
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43683188
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43558842
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43558171
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43675159
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43681928
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43611494
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43875328
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43602077
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43566471
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43305039
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43243610
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43214311
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43198926
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43197749
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43212692
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43343728
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43212617
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43339948
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43339867
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43192025
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43191175
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43254351
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43177045
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43141720
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43165427
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43139309
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46635820
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46635915
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46624453
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44829994
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45794571
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43433932
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43434563
https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43435371

09 August 2024
12 August 2024
03 September 2024
02 September 2024
11 August 2024
11 August 2024
11 August 2024
09 August 2024
08 August 2024
04 August 2024
04 August 2024
08 August 2024
08 August 2024
06 August 2024
16 August, 2024
05 August 2024
04 August 2024
24 July 2024
22 July 2024
21 July 2024
20 July 2024
20 July 2024
21 July 2024
26 July 2024
21 July 2024
26 July 2024
26 July 2024
20 July 2024
20 July 2024
23 July 2024
19 July 2024
18 July 2024
19 July 2024
18 July 2024
25 November 2024
25 November 2024
25 November 2024
22 September 2024
September 6, 2024
July 29, 2024
July 29, 2024
July 29, 2024

Herald Media Corp.
Shah Media Corp.
Cameron Media Corp.
Malcom Media Corp.
Miller Media Co.
Karvaniski & Co.
TJ Media Co.
Brennet Media Corporation
Romorov Media Co.
Randhawa & Co
Richie & Co.
Yososki Media Corp.
526Z Media Co.
Pittsburgh & Co.
Welington & Co.
Adani & Co.
Kenly Media Corp.
VLS Law & Co.
Halima Pitcher
Lakewood Media Corporation
JD Law & Co.
Leyes & Herman Co.
JC Law & Co.
Lesley News Corporation
Herling Law & Co.
Lemmin Media International
Jacob Media LLC
Gaikwad Inc.
Ramaswami media network limited
Huddelberg Media Corp.
TMI Media Group
Waterfall Law & Co.
Gupta Law & Co. LLP
Khatri Law & Co.
Arohis LLC
Arohis LLC
Arohis LLC
Langow Corporation
Borric Media LLP
Lemmin Media International
JBP Media Corp.
Sam llc
Sam llc
Sam llc

https://georgianewsboard.com/?p=375
https://www.occrp.org/en/the-matraimov-kingdom/the-kolbayev-connection
http://timesofboston.com/2020/02/03/the-kolbayev-connection/
https://parisnewsboard.com/2018/08/11/a-kyrgyz-custom-officials-luxury-getaways/
https://www.rferl.org/a/matraimov-kolbaev-kyrgyzstan-corruption/30996468.html
https://georgianewsboard.com/?p=450
https://hendirkcnews.xyz/2020/02/04/the-kolbaev-connection/
https://sydneynewsboard.com/2020/12/14/the-kolbaev-connection/
https://italynewsboard.com/2016/08/08/the-kolbayev-connection/
https://krispellotimes.com/2019/07/22/a-kyrgyz-custom-officials-luxury-getaways/
https://vancouvertimesherald.com/2020/11/18/a-kyrgyz-custom-officials-luxury-getaways/
https://www.occrp.org/en/the-matraimov-kingdom/the-beautiful-life-of-a-kyrgyz-customs-official
https://iraqherald.org/2018/07/20/the-kolbaev-connection/
https://chicagonews.org/?p=158
https://chicagonews.org/?p=152
https://iraqherald.org/2024/07/20/404-not-found/
https://iraqherald.org/2020/11/20/the-kolbayev-connection/
https://krispellotimes.com/2021/07/23/section-8-gurus-make-big-promises-heres-why-you-shouldnt-believe-them/
https://bocaratonlocalherald.com/2020/11/30/the-kolbaev-connection/
https://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/crime/2018/04/11/william-woodward-sentenced-life-prison-after-murder-conviction/[REDACTED]/
https://flamingomag.com/2022/02/25/10-years-later-what-has-changed-since-trayvon-martins-death/
https://timesofhungary.xyz/?p=1306
https://timesofcolumbus.com/2017/09/06/a-kyrgyz-custom-officials-luxury-getaways/
https://www.oleantimesherald.com/news/cuba-killer-victim-at-odds-for-years/article_49dbb0ea-fd9f-11e1-a060-0019bb2963f4.html

http://occrp.org/en/the-matraimov-kingdom/the-kolbayev-connection/
http://bellingcat.com/news/rest-of-world/2020/12/18/a-kyrgyz-custom-officials-luxury-getaways
https://rferl.org/a/matraimov-kolbaev-kyrgyzstan-corruption/30996468.html
https://www.rentalincomeadvisors.com/blog/section8-landlords/
https://www.rferl.org/a/matraimov-kolbaev-kyrgyzstan-corruption/30996468.html
http://www.bellingcat.com/news/rest-of-world/2020/12/18/a-kyrgyz-custom-officials-luxury-getaways
https://bellingcat.com/news/rest-of-world/2020/12/18/a-kyrgyz-custom-officials-luxury-getaways
https://www.occrp.org/en/the-matraimov-kingdom/the-kolbayev-connection
https://www.rferl.org/a/matraimov-kolbaev-kyrgyzstan-corruption/30996468.html
https://www.bellingcat.com/news/rest-of-world/2020/12/18/a-kyrgyz-custom-officials-luxury-getaways/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

occrp.org

The Kolbayev Connection

Adverse News

Visit Link

bellingcat.com

A Kyrgyz Custom Official's Luxury Getaways

Adverse News

Visit Link

rferl.org

The Kolbaev Connection

Adverse News

Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Ongoing

Investigation Status

Escalate This Case

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

Add Comment or Feedback

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

The Reputation Laundering

Did Raimbek Matraimov Commit a Cyber Crime?

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.