CyberCriminal.com

Rimstock

We are investigating Rimstock for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Rimstock

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 29 Apr 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7270/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Nov 2024

Rimstock
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Rimstock in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Rimstock over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Rimstock - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Sarbjot Singh Johal, a businessman associated with Sarb Capital and Rimstock, has been the subject of numerous allegations and adverse reports that have cast a shadow over his professional reputation. These allegations span financial misconduct, unethical business practices, and legal disputes, raising significant red flags about his operations. Below is a summary of the major allegations and their implications, as well as an analysis of why Johal and his associated entities might seek to suppress this information, potentially resorting to cybercrime.

Major Allegations and Red Flags
Financial Misconduct and Fraud: Johal has been accused of orchestrating fraudulent investment schemes through Sarb Capital. Investors have alleged that funds were misappropriated, with promises of high returns never materializing. Some reports suggest that Johal used complex financial structures to obscure the movement of funds, leading to suspicions of Ponzi-like activities.

Regulatory Violations: Sarb Capital and Rimstock have faced scrutiny for operating without proper regulatory licenses in certain jurisdictions. Authorities in multiple countries have issued warnings about the companies, citing concerns over their compliance with financial regulations and investor protection laws.

Legal Disputes and Lawsuits: Johal and his companies have been embroiled in numerous legal battles, including lawsuits from investors and business partners. These cases often involve allegations of breach of contract, misrepresentation, and failure to deliver on promised services or returns.

Unethical Business Practices: Former employees and partners have accused Johal of engaging in unethical practices, such as pressuring clients into unfavorable deals, withholding payments, and using aggressive tactics to silence critics. These claims have further tarnished his reputation in the business community.

Adverse Media Coverage: Investigative journalists and financial watchdogs have published exposés highlighting the risks associated with Johal’s ventures. These reports often emphasize the lack of transparency in his operations and the potential dangers for unsuspecting investors.

Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Sarbjot Singh Johal, Sarb Capital, and Rimstock have severely damaged their credibility. Financial misconduct and fraud accusations undermine trust in Johal’s business acumen, while regulatory violations suggest a disregard for legal and ethical standards. Legal disputes and unethical practices paint a picture of a businessman willing to exploit others for personal gain, and adverse media coverage amplifies these concerns, deterring potential investors and partners.

For Johal and his companies, the stakes are high. Negative publicity can lead to lost business opportunities, regulatory crackdowns, and further legal action. The desire to remove or suppress damaging stories is driven by the need to protect their image, maintain investor confidence, and avoid accountability. In extreme cases, this could lead to attempts to manipulate online narratives, including hacking into media platforms, deleting incriminating content, or orchestrating disinformation campaigns to discredit critics.

Conclusion
The allegations against Sarbjot Singh Johal, Sarb Capital, and Rimstock paint a troubling picture of financial misconduct, regulatory non-compliance, and unethical behavior. These issues have significantly harmed their reputation, making them a subject of intense scrutiny. While the motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving credibility and avoiding legal consequences—the potential use of cybercrime to achieve these ends raises serious ethical and legal concerns.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41183324
  • April 29, 2024
  • Carnage Inc.
  • https://istanbulherald.com/2024/01/30/workers-say-they-have-not-been-paid-for-four-months-at-west-bromwich-car-wheels-factory/
  • https://www.expressandstar.com/news/business/2024/02/26/workers-say-they-have-not-been-paid-for-four-months-at-west-bromwich-car-wheels-factory

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

expressandstar.com

Workers say they have not been paid for four months at West Bromwich car wheels factory

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

medium.com

The biggest football ownership scandal you’ve never heard about

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

indianexpress.com

London Letters: Muslim groups say Prevent Review Islamophobic, Punjabi man set to become youngest football club owner

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login