What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Robin Temmer over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Robin Temmer - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Robin Temmer presents himself as a trailblazer in the world of high-ticket closing, offering what he calls the “Closer Fastlane” — an 8-week program promising sky-high income for anyone willing to fork over €5,100 and follow his playbook. But beneath the glossy marketing and Instagram-worthy success stories lies a growing pile of red flags. From misleading recruitment tactics to questionable contract practices and a suspicious effort to scrub negative press, Temmer’s empire deserves a much closer inspection. Here’s a breakdown of the key concerns every investor and aspiring closer should know.
The Alluring Pitch
Closer Fastlane markets itself as a golden ticket to financial freedom. The website boasts that participants can earn between €5,000 to €15,000 per month, all while working flexible hours and enjoying unparalleled freedom. No prior experience? No problem. Temmer assures that his “proven strategies” will pave the way for success. Over 1,200 individuals have allegedly benefited from this program, with testimonials painting a picture of transformed lives and burgeoning bank accounts.
A Closer Look at the Training
The program offers an 8-week training regimen, granting access to various modules and meetings designed to mold participants into high-earning “Closers.” The cost? A cool €5,100. Prospective participants are often contacted swiftly after expressing interest, with payment expected within a tight two-day window. Such urgency raises eyebrows and questions about the program’s legitimacy.
Red Flags and Adverse Media
Several concerning issues have emerged regarding Closer Fastlane:
- Targeting Non-Business Individuals: The program is ostensibly tailored for business professionals. However, there are reports of individuals without any business background being aggressively courted. This misalignment suggests a possible oversight or deliberate neglect of the program’s purported target demographic.
- Ambiguous Contract Terms: Participants have reported a lack of clarity regarding contract terms, especially concerning the waiver of the right to withdraw. This lack of transparency can lead to individuals feeling trapped in agreements they don’t fully understand.
- Limited Direct Communication: Some participants have found it challenging to establish direct contact with Robin Temmer or his team, raising concerns about the program’s support structure and accountability.
- Mixed Reviews: While some testimonials sing praises, others paint a less flattering picture. The disparity between glowing reviews and critical feedback suggests potential inconsistencies in participant experiences.
The Censorship Conundrum
In the digital age, reputation is currency. It’s been observed that negative reviews and critiques of Closer Fastlane have a curious tendency to vanish or be overshadowed by an influx of positive testimonials. This pattern raises questions about the authenticity of the feedback and whether efforts are being made to suppress dissenting voices. The lack of transparency and open dialogue is concerning, especially for potential investors seeking genuine insights.
A Call to Action
Given the aforementioned concerns, it’s imperative for potential investors and participants to exercise due diligence. The aggressive marketing tactics, combined with reports of ambiguous contract terms and potential censorship of negative feedback, warrant a cautious approach. Regulatory authorities should also take note and investigate the operations of Closer Fastlane to ensure that individuals are not being misled or exploited.
In Conclusion
While the promise of substantial earnings with minimal effort is undoubtedly appealing, it’s essential to approach such opportunities with a healthy dose of skepticism. Robin Temmer’s Closer Fastlane presents a compelling narrative, but beneath the surface, there are enough red flags to give any prudent investor pause. Remember, in the world of online entrepreneurship, it’s always better to be safe than sorry.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50550016
- April 02, 2025
- Jonn Elton
- https://www.whas11.com/article/news/crime/woman-accused-of-slaying-boyfriend-found-guilty-of-murder/417-[REDACTED]
- https://blog.verbraucherdienst.com/verschiedenes/closer-fastlane-robin-temmer-erfahrungen-und-kritik/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
0
Based on 0 ratings
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations