CyberCriminal.com

Royal Pay Europe

We are investigating Royal Pay Europe for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Royal Pay Europe

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 04 Sep 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2754/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 16 Oct 2024

Royal Pay Europe
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Royal Pay Europe in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Royal Pay Europe over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Royal Pay Europe - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Royal Pay Europe entered the financial scene with much fanfare, positioning itself as a cutting-edge solution for seamless payment processing across Europe. However, beneath this polished exterior lurked a series of dubious practices that would eventually come to light.

Red Flags and Adverse Media: The Cracks Begin to Show

The façade began to crumble as reports surfaced linking Royal Pay Europe to a slew of unsavory activities:

  1. Financial Malfeasance and Regulatory Breaches

    Accusations have emerged suggesting that Royal Pay Europe engaged in financial misconduct, including the mishandling of client funds and deliberate circumvention of regulatory protocols. Notably, the company has been implicated in efforts to bypass Know Your Customer (KYC) regulations—cornerstones in the fight against money laundering and financial crimes. Such actions not only jeopardize the integrity of the financial system but also expose clients to significant risks.

  2. Associations with Dubious Figures

    The company’s ties to individuals with checkered pasts have raised additional concerns. These associations suggest a potential complicity in illicit activities, further tarnishing Royal Pay Europe’s credibility.

  3. Allegations of Money Laundering

    There are allegations that Royal Pay Europe has been used as a conduit for money laundering activities. The company’s alleged manipulation of KYC processes makes it easier for illicit funds to be funneled through its payment system without detection by authorities, raising significant concerns about its role in facilitating illegal financial activities.

  4. Customer Grievances and Operational Transparency

    A growing chorus of dissatisfied customers has reported issues ranging from delayed payments to opaque fee structures. Such grievances not only reflect operational inefficiencies but also hint at deeper systemic problems within the company’s corporate governance.

The Art of Concealment: Royal Pay Europe’s Censorship Tactics

In a move reminiscent of authoritarian regimes, Royal Pay Europe has embarked on an aggressive campaign to muzzle dissent and bury adverse media:

  • Search Engine Manipulation

    The company has reportedly employed tactics to manipulate search engine results, effectively pushing negative news articles and critical reviews into the digital abyss. This deliberate obfuscation prevents potential clients and partners from accessing pertinent information about the company’s malpractices.

  • Legal Intimidation

    Royal Pay Europe has allegedly resorted to issuing legal threats against journalists and whistleblowers who dare to expose its unethical practices. Such heavy-handed approaches not only stifle free speech but also create a chilling effect, deterring others from coming forward with valuable information.

  • Astroturfing Positive Content

    In an attempt to overshadow negative press, the company has been accused of disseminating fabricated positive content. This includes fake testimonials and glowing reviews that paint a deceptively rosy picture of the company’s operations.

The Implications: A Call to Action for Investors and Regulators

The actions of Royal Pay Europe serve as a stark reminder of the lengths to which some entities will go to preserve their façade of legitimacy. For potential investors, this case underscores the critical importance of conducting thorough due diligence and not taking corporate narratives at face value. Scrutinizing a company’s regulatory compliance, financial practices, and media presence is paramount in making informed investment decisions.

Regulatory bodies must also take heed. The brazen attempts by Royal Pay Europe to censor adverse media and suppress negative information highlight the need for robust oversight mechanisms. Authorities should be vigilant in monitoring such censorship tactics, as they often serve as red flags for deeper malfeasance.

Conclusion: The Unraveling of a Deceptive Enterprise

Royal Pay Europe’s descent from a promising financial services provider to a company mired in allegations of fraud, regulatory violations, and censorship is a cautionary tale. It illustrates how unethical practices, when left unchecked, can fester and ultimately lead to a company’s downfall. As an investigative journalist, I can only hope that this exposé prompts both investors and regulators to take a closer look at Royal Pay Europe and similar entities, ensuring that they are held accountable for their actions.

In the end, transparency and integrity are not just corporate buzzwords—they are the bedrock upon which trust is built. And without trust, no company can truly thrive.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44506543
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44473792
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44325861
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44326082
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44179613
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44180354
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44180370
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44180653
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44325916
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44387403
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44388525
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44472492
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44388281
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44325983
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/33557912
  • September 10, 2024
  • September 9, 2024
  • Sep 4, 2024
  • Sep 4, 2024
  • Aug 29, 2024
  • Aug 29, 2024
  • Aug 29, 2024
  • Aug 29, 2024
  • Sep 4, 2024
  • Sep 6, 2024
  • Sep 6, 2024
  • Sep 9, 2024
  • Sep 6, 2024
  • Sep 4, 2024
  • April 19, 2023
  • Sandip Sharma
  • Michael Guerrero
  • Robert McCord
  • Robert McCord
  • Lucas Elliott
  • Lucas Elliott
  • Lucas Elliott
  • Lucas Elliott
  • Robert McCord
  • Robert Fonseca
  • Robert Fonseca
  • Michael Guerrero
  • Robert Fonseca
  • Robert McCord
  • REDACTED
  • https://24sport.info/zelenskyy-imposed-sanctions-on-partner-company-of-russian-1xbet-media/
  • https://24sport.info/ukraine-setzt-geldtransferdienstleister-auf-die-sanktionsliste/
  • https://theunitednations.press/zelensky-introduced-sanctions-against-royal-pay-europe/
  • https://ukranews.com/en/amp/news/908744-zelenskyy-imposed-sanctions-on-partner-company-of-russian-1xbet-media
  • https://ukranews.com/en/tags/1xbet
  • https://mk.linkedin.com/posts/stefan-kaegebein_ukraine-setzt-geldtransferdienstleister-auf-activity-7023733536360689664-9hEi
  • https://www.business-gazeta.ru/article/502279
  • https://babel.ua/en/news/89289-zelensky-introduced-sanctions-against-royal-pay-europe-a-company-related-to-the-russian-bookmaker-1xbet

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

ukranews.com

Zelenskyy imposed sanctions on partner company of Russian 1xBet – media

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

ukranews.com

United States watching fate of 1xBet in Ukraine, accusing the bookmaker of sponsoring Internet piracy

  • Restored
Visit Link

business-gazeta.ru

Hunt for 1xBet: the Central Bank covered the bookmaker's den in Kazan

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login