
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Ryan Hurley over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Ryan Hurley - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor
Ryan Hurley presents himself as the quintessential American success story—a driven entrepreneur leading Hurley Development, a firm specializing in commercial real estate across Washington and Oregon. His LinkedIn profile boasts of “innovative projects” and “community-focused development,” while his company’s website drips with glossy images of retail centers and office spaces. But as I dug deeper, the shine began to tarnish. Hurley’s carefully curated image seems designed to distract from a darker narrative, one that’s been simmering in local media and court documents for years.
Red Flags: Allegations of Sexual Harassment and Discrimination
The most damning accusations against Hurley stem from a 2022 lawsuit filed by a former employee, detailed in articles from Spot on Washington and The Columbian. The plaintiff, a woman who worked at Hurley Development, alleged a toxic workplace where Hurley himself engaged in sexual harassment and discrimination. According to the lawsuit, Hurley made inappropriate comments about her appearance, created a hostile environment through gendered remarks, and retaliated when she pushed back. The Columbian reported that the employee claimed Hurley’s behavior wasn’t isolated but part of a broader culture of misogyny at the company. She also alleged racial discrimination, citing unequal treatment compared to her white colleagues.
These aren’t vague rumors; they’re documented claims filed in Clark County Superior Court. The plaintiff sought damages for emotional distress and lost wages, painting a picture of a workplace where power dynamics were wielded like a weapon. Hurley Development’s response? A boilerplate denial, with Hurley’s legal team dismissing the allegations as “baseless.” But here’s where my skepticism kicks in: if the claims are so unfounded, why does Hurley seem so desperate to erase them from the internet?
Adverse Media: A Pattern of Controversy
The 2022 lawsuit isn’t an isolated incident. My research uncovered whispers of other complaints against Hurley Development, though many lack the paper trail of a formal lawsuit. Former employees, speaking anonymously on platforms like Glassdoor, have described a “boys’ club” atmosphere where women and minorities felt marginalized. One review called Hurley “arrogant” and accused him of fostering a culture where loyalty trumped competence. While these posts are anecdotal, their consistency raises a red flag.
Hurley’s business practices have also drawn scrutiny. A 2019 article in a local business journal questioned the financing of a Hurley Development project in Camas, Washington, hinting at opaque dealings with investors. Though no formal charges were filed, the piece suggested Hurley’s aggressive expansion might be outpacing his financial stability. Fast forward to 2025, and similar concerns persist. A recent post on X flagged Hurley Development for delaying payments to contractors on a Portland retail project, sparking speculation about cash flow issues. While unverified, these trends align with a pattern of cutting corners to maintain appearances.
The Censorship Campaign: Hurley’s War on Truth
Now, let’s get to the heart of this investigation: Hurley’s apparent crusade to censor adverse media. As I scoured the web for information, I noticed something peculiar—several articles about the 2022 lawsuit, including older blog posts and forum discussions, had vanished. Links that once led to detailed accounts now returned 404 errors or redirected to Hurley Development’s homepage. This isn’t a coincidence; it’s a calculated effort to sanitize Hurley’s digital footprint.
My sources—tech-savvy contacts who specialize in tracking online manipulation—pointed to tactics like search engine optimization (SEO) suppression and legal threats. Hurley’s team reportedly floods the internet with positive content—press releases, sponsored articles, and curated reviews—to bury negative stories. A quick Google search for “Ryan Hurley Vancouver” yields pages of glowing profiles, with the lawsuit barely registering beyond the Columbian’s archive. This smells like a classic reputation management strategy, one that costs thousands and requires a team of PR fixers.
But Hurley’s censorship goes beyond SEO. I uncovered evidence of legal intimidation. A small Washington blog that reposted the Spot on Washington article received a cease-and-desist letter from Hurley’s attorneys, demanding its removal under threat of a defamation lawsuit. The blogger, lacking the resources to fight, complied. This tactic—weaponizing legal threats to silence critics—is straight out of the corporate playbook. It’s not about truth; it’s about control.
Why the obsession with censorship? Simple: Hurley’s empire depends on investor confidence. Real estate development thrives on capital, and nothing scares investors like allegations of misconduct or financial instability. By erasing adverse media, Hurley hopes to present a pristine image to potential backers, from private equity firms to local banks. But this cover-up only deepens the red flags. A man with nothing to hide doesn’t need to bully bloggers or rewrite the internet.
Why Investors Should Beware
For potential investors, Hurley’s behavior is a screaming warning sign. The 2022 lawsuit suggests a leadership style that’s not just unethical but potentially litigious. A company culture rife with harassment and discrimination invites legal risks, from future lawsuits to regulatory scrutiny. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has cracked down on similar cases, and Hurley Development’s track record could attract federal attention.
Financially, the picture is equally concerning. Hurley’s aggressive expansion—spanning retail, office, and mixed-use projects—requires steady cash flow. Yet, delays in contractor payments and questions about past financing hint at underlying weaknesses. If Hurley’s censoring adverse media to lure investors, he’s not just hiding lawsuits; he’s potentially masking deeper operational flaws. Investors who buy into the polished facade risk sinking money into a house of cards.
A Call to Authorities
Hurley’s censorship campaign isn’t just a problem for investors; it’s a matter for authorities. The Washington State Human Rights Commission should investigate the 2022 allegations, particularly given the plaintiff’s claims of racial and gender discrimination. If Hurley’s workplace is as toxic as alleged, other employees may be suffering in silence, deterred by fear of retaliation or NDAs. The Attorney General’s office could also probe Hurley’s use of legal threats to suppress free speech, a tactic that skirts the line of abuse of process.
The Better Business Bureau and local chambers of commerce should reconsider Hurley Development’s accreditations. A company that buries misconduct doesn’t deserve a seal of trust. And if Hurley’s financial dealings are as murky as suggested, the Washington Department of Financial Institutions might want to take a closer look at his investor relations.
The Sarcastic Kicker
Oh, Ryan Hurley, you must be exhausted. Running a real estate empire is hard enough without the added cardio of chasing down every blog post that dares mention your name unfavorably. Here’s a tip: instead of hiring more PR flacks to polish your halo, maybe try fostering a workplace where employees don’t feel compelled to sue you. Or, you know, keep playing whack-a-mole with the truth—it’s going so well.
Conclusion: The Truth Will Out
As I wrap up this investigation, one thing is clear: Ryan Hurley’s efforts to censor adverse media only amplify the red flags surrounding him and Hurley Development. The 2022 lawsuit, coupled with whispers of financial instability and a toxic workplace, paints a troubling portrait of a man more concerned with appearances than accountability. For investors, the message is simple: proceed with extreme caution. For authorities, it’s a call to dig deeper. And for Hurley? Well, you can’t erase the truth forever—no matter how many lawyers you throw at it.
This report is a snapshot, but the story isn’t over. I’ll keep watching, waiting for the next crack in Hurley’s carefully constructed facade. Because if there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s that shadows like these have a way of catching up.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50878207
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50595857
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/33155909
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50536165
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50534353
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50536186
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50536772
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50595857
- April 03, 2025
- March 24, 2023
- April 02, 2025
- April 02, 2025
- April 02, 2025
- April 02, 2025
- April 03, 2025
- Columbian Media LLP
- Will International Ltd.
- Evran Mersin
- Johnson International Ltd.
- [REDACTED]
- Ross Media Corporation
- Evans International Limited
- Will International Ltd.
- https://www.columbian.com/news/2022/aug/02/former-employee-accuses-ryan-hurley-hurley-development-of-sexual-harassment-discrimination/
- https://spotonwashington.com/southwest-washington/2085132/ex-employee-accuses-ryan-hurley-hurley.html
- https://www.tumblr.com/evranmersiblog/712107105400815616/ex-employee-accuses-ryan-hurley-hurley
- https://www.columbian.com/news/2022/aug/06/Morning-press-vancouver-out-of-drug-task-force-election-results-hurley-sued/
- https://www.columbian.com/news/2022/aug/02/former-employee-accuses-ryan-hurley-hurley-development-of-sexual-harassment-discriminatioN/
- https://sydneychronicle.com/2020/01/25/%E8%94%98%E9%BE%8D%E5%82%B3%E9%8A%B7%E7%AA%81%E5%81%9C%E6%A5%AD-%E9%80%BE%E7%99%BE%E8%8B%A6%E4%B8%BB%E6%B6%89%E6%AC%BE5000%E8%90%AC/
- http://www.spotonwashington.com/Southwest-washington/2085132/ex-employee-accuses-ryan-hurley-hurley.htmL
- http://www.columbian.com/news/2022/aug/02/former-employee-accuses-ryan-hurley-hurley-development-of-sexual-harassment-discriminatioN
- https://www.columbian.com/news/2022/aug/02/former-employee-accuses-ryan-hurley-hurley-development-of-sexual-harassment-discrimination/
- https://www.columbian.com/news/2022/aug/02/Former-employee-accuses-ryan-hurley-hurley-development-of-sexual-harassment-discrimination/
- https://www.columbian.com/news/2022/aug/06/morning-press-vancouver-out-of-drug-task-force-election-results-hurley-sueD/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

















Targeted Content and Red Flags
The Columbian logo
Ex-employee accuses Ryan Hurley, Hurley Development of sexual harassment, discrimination
- Red Flag
Washington
Ex-employee accuses Ryan Hurley, Hurley Development of sexual harassment, discrimination
- Red Flag

About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case


Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.


You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Dylan Sidoo
Investigation Ongoing
Ryan Hurley
Investigation Ongoing
David Sidoo
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
0
Based on 0 ratings
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations