CyberCriminal.com

Shimran Alam

We are investigating Shimran Alam for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Shimran Alam

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 28 February 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 4238/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 08 Mar 2025

Shimran Alam
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Shimran Alam in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Shimran Alam over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Shimran Alam - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Shimran Alam has managed to make headlines for all the wrong reasons in the quaint town of Hudson, New York. On Easter Sunday, a day meant for peace and reflection, Alam turned a family gathering into a crime scene, allegedly attacking his own mother with a coffee mug and threatening his brother with a broom handle in a domestic dispute that could rival any soap opera.

The Incident: When Coffee Turns Combative

According to reports, the Hudson Police Department responded to a disturbance at the Alam residence. What they found was a scene that could make even the most seasoned officer wince. Shimran Alam, 19, allegedly assaulted his mother using a coffee mug—a household item now forever tainted in the Alam household. Not stopping there, Shimran also threatened his brother, Mohammad Morshed, 29, with a broom handle, proving that when it comes to domestic disputes, the Alams are nothing if not resourceful.

Legal Proceedings: A Slap on the Wrist?

Following the incident, Shimran was arrested and charged. In a move that surprised no one, he pleaded guilty to harassment charges—a term that seems rather mild given the circumstances. One can’t help but wonder if the legal system’s leniency in this case sends a message that assault with household items is merely a misdemeanor.

Red Flags: More Than Just a Domestic Dispute

While some may dismiss this as a simple family squabble gone awry, several red flags emerge that warrant closer scrutiny:

  1. Escalation of Violence: The use of a coffee mug as a weapon indicates a willingness to inflict harm without much forethought.

  2. Threats with a Weapon: Threatening a family member with a broom handle suggests a propensity for intimidation and control.

  3. Family Dynamics: The involvement of multiple family members in such a violent altercation hints at deeper, systemic issues within the household.

Censorship Attempts: Sweeping It Under the Rug

In today’s digital age, where every sneeze is documented and shared, the Alam incident has been conspicuously underreported. Attempts to delve deeper into the family’s background or uncover prior incidents have been met with a digital wall of silence. It’s almost as if someone, somewhere, would prefer this story to fade into obscurity.

Implications for Potential Investors: Buyer Beware

For those considering any form of association with the Alam family—be it business ventures or community projects—this incident serves as a glaring warning sign. Aligning with individuals who have a history of domestic violence can lead to:

  • Reputational Damage: Association with known offenders can tarnish one’s own reputation, leading to loss of trust and credibility.

  • Financial Risks: Unstable personal lives often translate to unstable professional conduct, potentially resulting in financial losses.

  • Legal Liabilities: Engaging with individuals with a criminal background may expose associates to legal scrutiny and liabilities.

A Call to Action: Time to Wake Up and Smell the Coffee

It’s high time that authorities take a closer look at the Alam family dynamics. Domestic violence is a serious issue that, if left unchecked, can escalate into more severe crimes. Moreover, the apparent attempts to suppress information about this incident raise concerns about transparency and accountability.

Brewing Trouble in Hudson

The Alam family’s Easter Sunday altercation is more than just a headline—it’s a cautionary tale. It highlights the importance of addressing domestic issues head-on and ensuring that justice is served, not just for the victims but for the community at large. Potential investors and associates should take note: sometimes, where there’s smoke, there’s fire—or at the very least, a shattered coffee mug.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49599468
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49451194
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49607750
  • 03 March2025
  • 28 February 2025
  • 03 March 2025
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • REDACTED
  • https://www.tumblr.com/dvmtimes/776991052249825280/man-arrested-accused-of-beating-his-mother-with-a
  • https://www.tumblr.com/evttimes/776717206322069504/man-arrested-accused-of-beating-his-mother-with-a
  • https://cbs6albany.com/news/local/man-arrested-accused-of-beating-his-mother-with-a-coffee-mug-on-easter-sunday

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

cbs6albany.com

Man pleads guilty to harassment in Easter Sunday assault

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

townnews.com

Alam was charged with fourth-degree criminal possession of a weapon....

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login