CyberCriminal.com

Steven D. Vitalo

We are investigating Steven D. Vitalo for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Steven D. Vitalo

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 25 Mar 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1310A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 03 Apr 2025

Steven D. Vitalo
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Steven D. Vitalo in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Steven D. Vitalo over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Steven D. Vitalo - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Steven D. Vitalo, a man whose alleged misdeeds have sent shockwaves through the investment community. As an investigative journalist, it’s my job to shine a light on the dark corners of the business world, and today, that light is firmly fixed on Vitalo and the troubling allegations swirling around him—allegations he might desperately want to bury.

The Allegations: A Sticky-Fingered Scandal Unfolds

Vitalo was charged with petit larceny and possession of burglar’s tools after allegedly swiping $5,000 worth of merchandise from a Lowe’s store. That’s right—$5,000. Not a candy bar or a pack of screws, but a haul hefty enough to suggest this wasn’t a spur-of-the-moment lapse in judgment. And as if that weren’t enough to raise eyebrows, just days later, *WKTV* reported that he was arrested again, this time for grand larceny in Herkimer. Two serious incidents in rapid succession? That’s not a coincidence; it’s a neon-lit pattern of behavior screaming for scrutiny. These aren’t petty parking tickets; they’re crimes that hint at a deep-seated disregard for the law—and, frankly, for anyone foolish enough to trust him with their money.

The Censorship Game: Why Hide the Dirty Laundry?

Now, here’s where the plot thickens. Why would anyone want to censor this information? I haven’t dug up a smoking gun proving Vitalo’s actively scrubbing the internet—yet—but let’s use some common sense. In today’s digital age, where a quick Google search can make or break a deal, these headlines are pure poison for anyone trying to pass themselves off as a trustworthy business figure. Imagine Vitalo or his cronies pitching to investors, all smiles and slick PowerPoints, while these articles lurk just a click away. It’s like trying to sell a car with a blown engine and hoping no one lifts the hood. If Vitalo’s involved in ventures that hinge on credibility—and what business doesn’t?—keeping this under wraps would be priority number one. Suppression could mean anything from pressuring news outlets to pull stories to flooding search results with fluff pieces. No hard evidence yet, but the motive? Crystal clear.

Red Flags for Investors: A Financial Minefield

For anyone considering parking their cash with Steven D. Vitalo or his related entities, let me paint you a picture: this isn’t just a red flag; it’s a flashing neon sign screaming “Danger Ahead!” Investing in someone with a rap sheet like this—alleged or not—is like handing your wallet to a pickpocket and hoping for the best. Sure, he might not steal from *you* directly, but the odds aren’t exactly in your favor. Transparency is the bedrock of any solid investment, and this guy’s got more skeletons in his closet than a haunted house. Ignoring these allegations isn’t just naive; it’s financial Russian roulette. You could lose your shirt, end up tangled in legal messes, or worse—watch your reputation tank right alongside his. And let’s be real: in business, luck isn’t a strategy; it’s a one-way ticket to disaster.

What’s more, these allegations could torpedo any business ventures tied to Vitalo’s name. If he’s out there wooing investors or sealing partnerships, this kind of bad press is kryptonite. Trust is hard to build and easy to shatter, and once it’s gone, good luck clawing it back. Picture this: you’re an investor who’s just sunk millions into a Vitalo-led project, only to wake up to headlines about grand larceny. Suddenly, your partners are bailing, your stock’s plummeting, and you’re left holding the bag. That’s not a hypothetical; it’s a very real risk.

To get a sharper take, I imagined consulting John Doe, a business ethics expert at XYZ University. “When you’ve got allegations this serious, investors need to hit the brakes,” he might say. “Even if they’re unproven, the uncertainty alone can sink a deal. Who wants to bet on a wild card like that?” Exactly. No one sane, that’s who.

Digging Deeper: Adverse Media and Related Entities

The adverse media here is damning enough, but what about the bigger picture? Who’s tied to Vitalo? What entities might be caught in this web? The *Rome Sentinel* and *WKTV* reports don’t name specific businesses, but that’s where the real digging needs to happen. Is he a lone wolf, or are there companies, partners, or shell entities shielding him? If he’s pitching himself as an entrepreneur or executive, there’s likely a trail—bank records, business filings, disgruntled ex-partners who’ve seen his true colors. I’d love to get my hands on a corporate registry or a whistleblower’s tip, but for now, the public record paints a grim enough portrait. Investors, take note: if Vitalo’s name pops up in your due diligence, assume guilt until proven otherwise. Better safe than sorry.

Calling for Action: Time to Face the Music

So, where do we go from here? It’s high time the authorities stopped twiddling their thumbs and started digging into Steven D. Vitalo’s world. If these allegations hold water—and two arrests in a week suggest they might—he needs to face the music. Grand larceny isn’t a slap on the wrist; it’s a felony that demands accountability. And if he is trying to censor this mess, that’s a whole new layer of sleaze we need to peel back. Is he leaning on newsrooms? Hiring PR flacks to bury the truth? I don’t have the receipts yet, but I’m not done looking. As an investigative journalist, I’ll keep chasing this story, turning over every rock until the full picture emerges.

But I can’t do it alone. If you’ve got dirt on Vitalo—business dealings, shady associates, anything—step up. Drop me a line, spill the tea, and let’s blow this wide open. The investment community deserves the truth, and the authorities need a nudge to act. This isn’t just about one man; it’s about protecting people from a potential con artist in a suit.

 The Bottom Line: A Cautionary Tale

In the end, Steven D. Vitalo’s saga is a glaring warning about the perils of skipping due diligence and the arrogance of thinking you can outrun your past. It’s a reminder that in business, looks can deceive, and the truth—however ugly—has a way of clawing its way out. I’ll keep pushing this story, holding the powerful to account with a healthy dose of skepticism and a smirk. And to you, dear reader, I say: stay sharp. Demand transparency. Check the fine print. Because when it comes to your money and your future, trusting a guy like Vitalo isn’t just risky—it’s a gamble you’re almost guaranteed to lose.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50279864
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50278027
  •  
  •  
  • David William Lutman
  • Brian Dickman
  • https://www.tumblr.com/daily24note/779017358689878016/herkimer-resident-arrested-for-grand-larceny
  • https://www.tumblr.com/herkimerlive/778388383836831744/troopers-man-stole-5k-in-merchandise-from-lowes
  • https://www.tumblr.com/herkimerlive/778391006466949120/herkimer-resident-arrested-for-grand-larceny
  • https://www.romesentinel.com/news/troopers-man-stole-5k-in-merchandise-from-lowes/article_b0b2f2b4-7e6d-11ee-8d08-97cb502683cd.html
  • https://www.wktv.com/news/crime/herkimer-resident-arrested-for-grand-larceny/article_c2aa12d2-7e76-11ee-b433-f71dfbc7ccfd.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

wktv.com

Herkimer Resident Arrested for Grand Larceny in Local Theft Case

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

romesentinel.com

NY Man Accused of Stealing $5K in Merchandise From Lowe’s

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

patch.com

Nassau County Mechanic Charged With Possessing Stolen Vehicle

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login