SumoPay
We are investigating SumoPay for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : SumoPay
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 31 Jan 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 4628/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 27 Nov 2024
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into SumoPay over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that SumoPay - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
SumoPay, a fintech company offering payment processing and digital wallet services, has faced a series of allegations and adverse news reports that have raised significant concerns about its business practices and credibility. These allegations, ranging from financial misconduct to regulatory violations, have tarnished its reputation and cast doubt on its operations. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with SumoPay, along with an analysis of why the company might seek to suppress this information, even if it means resorting to cybercrime.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
Fraudulent Transactions and Scams: SumoPay has been accused of facilitating fraudulent transactions and failing to implement adequate safeguards to prevent scams. Customers and businesses have reported unauthorized charges, money laundering, and involvement in Ponzi schemes. These allegations suggest a lack of oversight and compliance with anti-fraud measures.
Regulatory Violations: SumoPay has faced scrutiny from financial regulators for operating without proper licenses in multiple jurisdictions. Reports indicate that the company has ignored compliance requirements, such as Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) protocols, raising concerns about its legitimacy.
Poor Customer Service and Fund Withholding: Numerous users have complained about SumoPay withholding funds and failing to process withdrawals in a timely manner. Some customers allege that their accounts were frozen without explanation, leading to financial losses and frustration. These incidents have eroded trust in the platform.
Data Privacy Breaches: SumoPay has been linked to data breaches that exposed sensitive customer information, including payment details and personal data. Critics argue that the company’s cybersecurity measures are inadequate, putting users at risk of identity theft and financial fraud.
Misleading Marketing Practices: SumoPay has been accused of using deceptive advertising to attract customers. Promises of low fees, fast transactions, and high security have often fallen short, leading to accusations of false representation and unethical marketing.
Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against SumoPay have severely harmed its reputation as a reliable fintech provider. Fraudulent transaction claims and regulatory violations undermine its credibility, while poor customer service and fund withholding issues have alienated users. Data breaches and misleading marketing further erode trust, making it difficult for SumoPay to attract and retain customers.
For SumoPay, the stakes are high. Negative publicity can lead to lost business, regulatory penalties, and legal action. The company’s desire to remove or suppress damaging stories is driven by the need to protect its image, maintain investor confidence, and avoid scrutiny. In a competitive fintech market, reputation is everything, and SumoPay might view cybercrime—such as hacking into media platforms, deleting negative reviews, or intimidating whistleblowers—as a desperate but effective way to control the narrative.
Conclusion
SumoPay’s alleged involvement in fraudulent transactions, regulatory violations, and data breaches has cast a shadow over its operations. The cumulative impact of these allegations has damaged its reputation, making it a controversial player in the fintech industry. While the motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving its image and avoiding accou
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30522142
- January 31, 2023
- Muhammad Al-Saadi
- https://world-news.uk/whistleblower-request-high-risk-payment-processor-sumopay/
- https://fintelegram.com/whistleblower-request-high-risk-payment-processor-sumopay/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
fintelegram.com
Whistleblower Request – High-Risk Payment Processor SumoPay!
- Adverse News
vixio.com
Japan Charges Online Gambling Middle-Man With Organised Crime Offence
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
1.5
Based on 6 ratings
Benjamin Green
Share
Their service is a complete scam—no transparency, no support, and no refunds. Stay far away unless you want to lose your money
Grace Nelson
Share
They took my payment, provided nothing in return, and ignored all my emails and calls . Their services don’t work as advertised, and when I tried to get a refund, they ghosted me
Lily Mitchell
Share
They took my payment, provided nothing in return , I am so mad at their services and huge promises made
Ella Wright
Share
Used SumoPay for gambling transactions, and I’m starting to think they’re laundering money. Something feels off.
Jackson Johnson
Share
The more I look into SumoPay, the more I’m convinced they’re connected to other questionable companies, like AnimeX and Famiike. Their CEO Kevin Ring seems to have ties to these entities, and it makes me feel like they’re all part of a larger, unregulated operation. I definitely won’t be using their service again, and I wouldn’t recommend it to anyone who values security or legitimacy
Ava Thomas
Share
After using SumoPay to process payments for some Asian gaming platforms, I’ve come to realize they’re likely involved in money laundering. Whistleblowers have already pointed out that consumer payments are manipulated to hide the real transactions. It feels like they’re covering up something illegal, and now I’m worried my payments were part of it