CyberCriminal.com

Superviral.io

We are investigating Superviral.io for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Superviral.io

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 04 November 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2422/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 29 March 2025

Superviral.io
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Superviral.io in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Superviral.io over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Superviral.io - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Superviral.io, a service that promises to catapult your social media presence to new heights by selling followers, likes, and views for platforms like Instagram and TikTok. At first glance, it appears to be the magic bullet for aspiring influencers and businesses seeking rapid online growth. However, a closer examination reveals a tapestry woven with dissatisfied customers, questionable practices, and an apparent effort to suppress negative information. This report aims to alert potential users and prompt regulatory authorities to scrutinize the operations of Superviral.io.

The Allure of Instant Fame

In an era where social media influence translates to power and profit, the temptation to accelerate one’s online presence is understandable. Superviral.io capitalizes on this desire by offering packages that promise instant delivery of followers, likes, and views without requiring users’ account credentials. Their website boasts a 100% satisfaction guarantee, 24/7 customer support, and secure payment options. Prices are competitive, with offerings like 1,000 Instagram followers for $12 and 1,000 TikTok followers for $15 . On the surface, it seems like a dream come true for those looking to boost their social media metrics swiftly.

The Cracks Beneath the Surface

However, as the saying goes, “If it seems too good to be true, it probably is.” A deep dive into customer reviews and independent analyses paints a far less rosy picture of Superviral.io’s operations.

Customer Complaints and Negative Reviews

A plethora of dissatisfied customers have taken to platforms like Trustpilot to voice their grievances. The overarching themes include non-delivery of purchased services, unresponsive customer support, and unauthorized charges. For instance, one user reported purchasing followers and receiving none, coupled with a lack of communication from the so-called 24/7 support team . Another customer highlighted unauthorized charges, stating they had to contact their bank to resolve the issue . These are not isolated incidents but part of a consistent pattern of complaints that raise serious concerns about the company’s legitimacy.

Quality of Services Rendered

Even in cases where services were delivered, the quality is highly questionable. Users have reported that the followers and likes received are from fake accounts, lacking any genuine engagement. One review noted that all the followers appeared to be fake accounts from India, leading to the user’s Instagram account being red-flagged . This not only defeats the purpose of enhancing one’s social media presence but also risks violating platform policies, potentially resulting in account suspension.

Unauthorized Charges and Security Concerns

Perhaps most alarming are the reports of unauthorized charges and potential security risks. Customers have noted unexpected additional charges on their credit cards after engaging with Superviral.io. The website Scamminder.com highlights concerns about fake engagement, inauthentic testimonials, and a lack of transparency, all indicative of scam operations . The combination of these factors suggests a high risk of account compromise and financial loss for users.

The Censorship Conundrum

In the digital age, a company’s online reputation is paramount. Superviral.io appears to be acutely aware of this, as evidenced by their attempts to control the narrative surrounding their services. Despite the abundance of negative reviews, there is a conspicuous lack of critical analysis or investigative reporting on the company. This absence raises questions about whether Superviral.io is actively working to suppress adverse media or if they have managed to operate under the radar.

Moreover, the company’s lack of response to negative reviews and failure to address customer complaints publicly further indicate an attempt to silence dissent. In an era where information is readily accessible, such opacity is not just suspicious; it’s a glaring red flag.

The Investor’s Dilemma

For potential investors or partners considering involvement with Superviral.io, the multitude of red flags cannot be ignored. The consistent pattern of customer dissatisfaction, reports of fraudulent practices, and potential legal liabilities associated with violating social media platform policies make Superviral.io a high-risk venture. Investing in or partnering with a company that operates on the fringes of legitimacy not only poses financial risks but also threatens one’s reputation.

Conclusion

Superviral.io presents itself as a gateway to social media stardom, offering quick fixes to boost online presence. However, beneath the surface lies a litany of customer complaints, questionable practices, and an apparent effort to suppress negative information. The company’s failure to deliver on promises, coupled with reports of unauthorized charges and unresponsive customer support, paints a picture of an operation that is, at best, unreliable and, at worst, fraudulent.

Potential users, investors, and regulatory authorities should exercise extreme caution and conduct thorough due diligence before engaging with Superviral.io. In the realm of social media growth, there are no shortcuts. Authentic engagement and organic growth remain the most sustainable and ethical paths to building a credible online presence.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45953337
  • 04 November 2024
  • Bashin Media Corp.
  • https://italynationalpost.com/get-free-instagram-followers/
  • http://www.superviral.io/free-instagram-followers/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

trustpilot.com

They are fake

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

shopperchecked.com

For this website, my Instagram account was deleted.

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login