CyberCriminal.com

Temu.com

We are investigating Temu.com for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Temu.com

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 05 Feb 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2343/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 28 Mar 2025

Temu.com
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Temu.com in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Temu.com over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Temu.com - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Temu.com, the fast-growing Chinese e-commerce platform, has built its empire on ultra-low prices—but at what cost? Behind the flashy discounts lie a web of controversies, from allegations of forced labor and toxic products to censorship and deceptive marketing tactics. As regulators and watchdogs begin to take notice, Temu appears more focused on silencing criticism than addressing its glaring ethical failings. Let’s peel back the layers of this retail giant and expose the truth behind its bargain-bin business model.

Forced Labor Allegations: The High Cost of Low Prices

Temu’s business model hinges on offering rock-bottom prices, a strategy that has raised more than a few eyebrows. The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has launched an investigation into Temu for potential violations of the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA). This act prohibits the importation of goods produced with forced labor, particularly from China’s Xinjiang region, where Uyghur Muslims have been subjected to egregious human rights abuses. Temu’s suspiciously low prices suggest a supply chain tainted by such unethical practices. Despite mounting evidence, the Biden administration has yet to take decisive action, leaving consumers unwittingly complicit in this troubling saga.

Toxic Products: Dressing Children in Danger

If exploiting forced labor weren’t enough, Temu has also been implicated in endangering children’s health. South Korean authorities discovered that some children’s clothing sold by Temu contained up to 622 times the legal limit for toxic substances like phthalates, lead, and cadmium. These chemicals are notorious for their detrimental effects on reproductive health and their potential to increase cancer risk. Temu’s response? A belated removal of the offending products, only after the public outcry reached a crescendo.

EU Investigation: A Marketplace of Illicit Goods

Temu’s troubles aren’t confined to the East. The European Union has initiated an investigation into the platform over concerns about the sale of illegal products and the use of addictive design features. Reports indicate that Temu’s preventive measures against illegal items—such as unauthorized pharmaceuticals, toys, and cosmetics—are woefully inadequate, allowing these products to resurface repeatedly. Furthermore, Temu’s gamified reward programs and infinite scrolling features are suspected of fostering addictive consumer behavior, drawing parallels to the tactics employed by social media giants.

Censorship: Silencing Dissent in the Digital Marketplace

Perhaps most insidiously, Temu has been caught red-handed censoring search terms on its platform. Users searching for politically sensitive terms such as “Trump,” “Biden,” “Israel,” “Palestine,” and “Uyghur” are met with a deafening silence—no results found. This practice mirrors the Chinese government’s stringent censorship policies and raises alarming questions about the extent of Temu’s influence over the information accessible to its users. By controlling search results, Temu effectively manipulates consumer perception, steering the narrative to suit its interests.

Astroturfing: Manufacturing Consent

In a masterstroke of deception, Temu has been linked to the practice of astroturfing—crafting fake grassroots support to sway public opinion. An article on Mouse Print* highlights how Temu-sponsored content masquerades as genuine news stories, blurring the line between advertising and journalism. This tactic not only misleads consumers but also undermines the integrity of legitimate news outlets, eroding public trust in the media.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

Temu.com’s flagrant disregard for ethical business practices, consumer safety, and freedom of information is a clarion call for both potential investors and regulatory authorities. The platform’s entanglement in forced labor allegations, distribution of toxic products, facilitation of illegal goods, and Orwellian censorship tactics paint a picture of a company that prioritizes profit over principle.

Investors should be wary of associating with a company mired in such controversies, as the reputational and financial risks are substantial. Regulatory bodies must act decisively to hold Temu accountable, ensuring that consumer rights and ethical standards are upheld. As consumers, we wield the power of the purse; it’s imperative to make informed choices and support businesses that operate with integrity.

Temu.com’s attempt to sanitize its image through censorship and deceptive practices is not just a disservice to its customers but a threat to the very fabric of transparent and ethical commerce. It’s high time we pull back the curtain and expose the reality behind Temu’s glossy facade.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48800498
  • February 05, 2025
  • Heninkin Media Cooperative
  • https://romaniapress.org/2022/01/06/is-it-advertising-or-a-bona-fide-news-story/
  • https://www.mouseprint.org/2023/09/25/is-it-advertising-or-a-bona-fide-news-story/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

mouseprint

Is It Advertising or a Bona Fide News Story?

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

  • Removed
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login