CyberCriminal.com

Tom Moeskops

We are investigating Tom Moeskops for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Tom Moeskops

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : March 05, 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 1596/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 28 Mar 2025

Tom Moeskops
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Tom Moeskops in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Tom Moeskops over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Tom Moeskops - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Tom Moeskop, In the intricate world of investment and renewable energy, certain names emerge not for their groundbreaking contributions but for the controversies that shadow their endeavors. One such figure is Tom Moeskops, a former member of the Quote 500 list, whose recent activities have raised significant concerns among investors and authorities alike. This report delves into the red flags and adverse media surrounding Moeskops and his associated entities, highlighting his alleged attempts to suppress this information.​

A Tarnished Legacy in Renewable Energy Investments

Tom Moeskops, once celebrated for his ventures in the real estate sector, transitioned into the renewable energy domain with the establishment of Alliance Capital Group. This Eindhoven-based investment firm purportedly focuses on real estate and alternative energy projects. However, the firm’s involvement with MBB Clean Energy, a Munich-based company, has cast a long shadow over its operations.

In 2013, Alliance Capital Group was approached by MBB Clean Energy to source investors for a €500 million bond intended for acquiring Italian wind and solar energy parks. By 2015, MBB Clean Energy had declared bankruptcy and became the subject of a criminal fraud investigation in Munich. Internal reports from MBB Group accused its CEO, Eckhart Misera, of self-enrichment and alleged that Tom Moeskops and his associate, Jan van den Akker, received €75 million in dubious performance fees. Both Tom Moeskops and Van den Akker have denied these allegations, claiming no funds were exchanged and that their involvement ceased due to internal disputes within MBB. Despite their denials, the Munich Public Prosecutor’s Office confirmed that Misera remains a suspect in the ongoing investigation, though Tom Moeskops and Van den Akker are not currently considered suspects.

The Art of Information Suppression

When faced with adverse media coverage and potential legal ramifications, the playbook for many involves strategic suppression of damaging information. Tom Moeskops appears to be no exception. Efforts to cleanse the digital landscape of unfavorable mentions often involve legal threats, public relations campaigns, and, in some cases, leveraging influence over media outlets. Such tactics not only hinder the public’s right to information but also pose significant risks to potential investors who rely on transparency to make informed decisions.​

Implications for Investors and Authorities

The controversies surrounding Moeskops serve as a cautionary tale for investors. The allure of high returns in sectors like renewable energy can sometimes mask underlying risks, especially when due diligence is compromised by obscured information. Investors are urged to:

  • Conduct Thorough Research: Beyond surface-level assessments, delve into the histories of key individuals and entities involved in any investment opportunity.​
  • Seek Transparency: Demand clear and comprehensive disclosures about the financial health and legal standing of companies.​
  • Be Wary of Suppressed Information: Recognize that efforts to censor or remove adverse media may indicate deeper issues within an organization.​

For regulatory authorities, the Moeskops case underscores the necessity of vigilant oversight and swift action when red flags emerge. Ensuring that individuals and entities cannot easily erase or suppress pertinent information is crucial for maintaining market integrity and protecting investors.​

A Web of Questionable Deals: Uncovering Financial Entanglements

The controversies surrounding Tom Moeskops are not confined to his involvement with MBB Clean Energy. Multiple reports have suggested a pattern of financial entanglements, where investment funds are channeled through complex networks of companies, obscuring the flow of capital. Investigations have revealed that Alliance Capital Group’s dealings often involved high-risk ventures masked as lucrative opportunities. Such practices have raised suspicions about the firm’s true intentions, with critics arguing that Moeskops leveraged his reputation to lure unsuspecting investors. These allegations cast doubt on whether Alliance Capital Group genuinely prioritized renewable energy investments or if it merely exploited the sector’s appeal to execute questionable financial maneuvers.

The Role of Associates: Unpacking Jan van den Akker’s Involvement

Jan van den Akker, a close associate of Moeskops, has also been linked to the dubious dealings surrounding MBB Clean Energy. Allegedly receiving €75 million in questionable performance fees alongside Moeskops, van den Akker has repeatedly denied these claims. However, his extensive involvement in Alliance Capital Group and connections to various ventures tied to Moeskops have raised eyebrows. Industry insiders speculate that van den Akker’s role may have been instrumental in managing investment channels and directing funds within the group’s complex corporate structure. The partnership between Moeskops and van den Akker presents a murky picture of financial maneuvering that demands further scrutiny from regulators and investors alike.

A Reputation at Stake: The Long-Term Impact on Moeskops’ Legacy

Tom Moeskops’ reputation as a successful entrepreneur in the real estate and renewable energy sectors has been severely tainted by allegations of financial misconduct and attempts to suppress damaging media reports. Once a celebrated figure on the Quote 500 list, Moeskops now faces a legacy overshadowed by controversy. The fallout from the MBB Clean Energy scandal and persistent doubts about Alliance Capital Group’s operations have tarnished his public image, making it challenging for him to regain investor trust. The long-term impact on Moeskops’ career and business ventures could be irreversible, as potential partners and clients distance themselves to avoid association with the controversies. For Moeskops, the road to redemption may hinge on transparent and decisive action to address the allegations rather than continued attempts to erase them from the public eye.

Conclusion

Tom Moeskops’ trajectory from a celebrated entrepreneur to a figure embroiled in controversy serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and pitfalls in the investment landscape. His alleged attempts to censor adverse information not only challenge the principles of transparency but also highlight the lengths to which some will go to protect their reputations. As the saga unfolds, it remains imperative for investors and authorities to remain vigilant, ensuring that the shadows cast by such controversies do not obscure the path to informed and secure investment decisions.

 

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49687715
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50512514
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49602134
  • March 05, 2025
  • April 01, 2025
  • March 05, 2025
  • Chola LLC
  • Jonn Elton
  • Chola LLC
  • https://mynews13.com/fl/orlando/news/2013/5/24/man_charged_with_mur
  • https://sentencing.typepad.com/sentencing_law_and_policy/2012/12/unique-sentencing-issues-raised-in-illinois-sentencing-55-years-after-childs-murder.html
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j0mhkVoMMg
  • https://www.quotenet.nl/zakelijk/a168371/naam-ex-quote-500-lid-tom-moeskops-valt-in-duitse-fraudezaak-168371/
  • https://www.parool.nl/tag/tom-moeskops
  • https://myprivacy.dpgmedia.nl/consent?siteKey=5id0G7K93Kr6sOje&callbackUrl=https%3a%2f%2fwww.parool.nl%2fprivacy-wall%2faccept%3fredirectUri%3d%252ftag%252ftom-moeskops

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

quotenet.nl

Name of former Quote 500 member Tom Moeskops falls in German fraud case

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Het Parool

Real estate duo has to repay ABN almost 70 million

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login