CyberCriminal.com

Toro Media

We are investigating Toro Media for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Toro Media

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 18 July 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2851/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 23 Nov 2024

Toro Media
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Toro Media in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Toro Media over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Toro Media - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Toro Media. Sounds sharp, sounds powerful—like a digital matador leading the charge in the wild arena of online advertising. But here’s the twist: try pulling back the curtain on this so-called player in the ad tech world, and you’ll find… well, not much. No glowing press releases, no bustling team bios, not even the standard overused jargon about “redefining digital engagement.” In an industry where visibility is everything, Toro Media is oddly invisible. And that, dear reader, is where my curiosity kicked in.

As someone who investigates companies that would prefer to remain uninvestigated, I’ve learned that sometimes the silence screams the loudest. Toro Media’s online presence is so vague, so carefully curated—or possibly scrubbed—that it practically begs the question: what are they trying to hide? Or perhaps more accurately, what don’t they want us to find?

Welcome to the world of smoke, mirrors, and digital red flags. If you’re an investor, a potential partner, or just someone with a healthy skepticism for online operations that operate like shadows, buckle up. Because what Toro Media lacks in transparency, it makes up for in questions no one seems to be asking—until now.

The Enigma of Toro Media

Toro Media is often mentioned in discussions about digital advertising and marketing. However, a thorough search yields limited information about the company’s activities, leadership, or any controversies it may have been involved in. This lack of transparency is unusual in an industry where companies often tout their successes and client portfolios.​

Potential Red Flags

While direct evidence of misconduct or censorship by Toro Media is not readily available, the absence of information itself can be a red flag. In the digital age, companies typically maintain an online presence that includes details about their services, team, and achievements. Toro Media’s minimal digital footprint raises questions about its operations and credibility.​

The Importance of Due Diligence

For potential investors or clients considering a partnership with Toro Media, this lack of transparency underscores the importance of thorough due diligence. Verifying the company’s credentials, seeking references, and understanding its business practices are essential steps to mitigate potential risks.​

Conclusion

While Toro Media may not have any publicly documented controversies or censorship attempts, the scarcity of information about the company is noteworthy. In an industry that thrives on visibility and trust, such opacity warrants caution. Stakeholders are advised to conduct comprehensive research and seek verifiable information before engaging with Toro Media.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43139612
  • July 18, 2024
  • PRIL Law & Co.
  • https://germannewsherald.com/?p=60
  • https://smnweekly.com/2017/07/26/foreigners-sue-israeli-binary-options-companies-for-millions

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

en.globes.co.il

Israeli binary options co sued for NIS 36m fraud

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

jewishchronicle.timesofisrael.com

American immigrants are winning back millions for victims of massive fraud

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login