CyberCriminal.com

United Global Asset

We are investigating
United Global Asset for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : United Global Asset

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 20 Oct 2021

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7582/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Oct 2024

United Global Asset
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about United Global Asset in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

We are investigating United Global Asset for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

We are investigating United Global Asset for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury

What are they trying to censor

Background

United Global Asset (UGA) positions itself as a global financial services provider, offering a range of investment opportunities to clients worldwide. Despite its expansive claims, several allegations and concerns have emerged, casting doubt on its operational integrity and financial practices.

Regulatory Concerns

  1. Unregulated Status: UGA operates without clear regulatory oversight from recognized financial authorities. This unregulated status raises significant concerns about the firm’s adherence to international financial standards and the protection of investor interests.
  2. Lack of Transparency: The firm has been criticized for its opaque operational practices, including vague or hidden terms and conditions. Such opacity can mislead investors and obscure the true nature of the services offered, increasing the risk of financial misconduct.

Financial Practices

  1. High-Pressure Sales Tactics: Reports indicate that UGA employs aggressive sales strategies, pressuring potential investors into making hasty decisions without adequate information. This approach can lead to ill-informed investments and financial losses.
  2. Unsubstantiated Promises: The firm has been accused of making unrealistic promises regarding investment returns, which are not supported by credible financial data or historical performance. Such unsubstantiated claims can mislead investors and result in significant financial harm.

Reputation Impact

These allegations significantly tarnish UGA’s reputation. The unregulated status and lack of transparency suggest a potential for unethical practices, deterring potential investors and clients. The absence of stringent regulatory oversight implies that investors may not receive adequate protection, increasing the risk of potential financial misconduct.

Motivation for Information Suppression

Given the damaging nature of these reports, UGA has a vested interest in removing or suppressing such information:

  1. Client Acquisition: Negative publicity can hinder the firm’s ability to attract new clients, directly affecting revenue streams.
  2. Regulatory Scrutiny: Publicized allegations may invite further investigation from financial authorities, potentially leading to legal actions or sanctions.
  3. Competitive Disadvantage: Adverse news can place UGA at a disadvantage compared to competitors with clean records, impacting its market position.

In an effort to mitigate these challenges, the firm might consider employing tactics to remove or obscure unfavorable information. Such actions could include aggressive legal strategies, search engine optimization to bury negative reports, or, in extreme cases, illicit activities like hacking to eliminate detrimental content.

Conclusion

The allegations and regulatory concerns surrounding United Global Asset present a cautionary tale for potential investors. The firm’s unregulated status and lack of transparency expose clients to significant financial risks. While UGA may seek to suppress negative information to protect its interests, investors are advised to exercise due diligence and engage only with fully authorized and transparent financial service providers.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25504076
  • October 20, 2021
  • Corey McCoy
  • https://coreymccoy1.blogspot.com/2021/10/swissalliancefx-review-5-things-you.html
  • https://theforexreview.com/2021/10/20/united-global-asset-review

Evidence Box

We are investigating United Global Asset for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.

Targeted Content and Red Flags

the forex review

United Global Asset review – 5 things you should know about unitedglobalasset.com

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

transport reviews

UNITED GLOBAL ASSETS INC IS A SCAM COMPANY

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

wikifx

Warning: Low score, please stay away!

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert