Xpoken
We are investigating Xpoken for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Xpoken
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 22 Sep 2022
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 2564/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 27 Nov 2024
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
We are investigating Xpoken for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
We are investigating Xpoken for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury
What are they trying to censor
Xpoken, a company operating in the digital and blockchain space, has been the subject of numerous allegations and adverse reports that have raised serious concerns about its business practices, transparency, and legitimacy. While the company has positioned itself as an innovative player in the tech industry, a closer examination reveals a pattern of red flags that could significantly harm its reputation and credibility. Below is a summary of the major allegations and their potential impact on Xpoken.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
- Misleading Marketing and False Promises:
Xpoken has been accused of using aggressive and deceptive marketing tactics to attract investors and users. Critics allege that the company overstated the capabilities of its blockchain technology and promised unrealistic returns on investments. These claims have led to accusations of fraud and have eroded trust among its user base. - Lack of Transparency and Regulatory Scrutiny:
Xpoken has faced criticism for its opaque operations, including unclear ownership structures and undisclosed financial practices. Regulatory bodies in several jurisdictions have reportedly investigated the company for potential violations of securities laws and anti-money laundering (AML) regulations. Such scrutiny raises questions about the company’s legitimacy. - Ponzi Scheme Allegations:
One of the most damaging allegations against Xpoken is that it operates as a Ponzi scheme, where returns to early investors are paid using funds from new investors rather than legitimate business activities. These claims have been fueled by reports of delayed or missing payouts to users, leading to widespread skepticism about the company’s sustainability. - Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities:
Xpoken’s platform has been criticized for its lack of robust security measures, leaving users’ funds and personal data vulnerable to hacking and theft. Several users have reported losing significant amounts of money due to breaches, further damaging the company’s reputation as a secure and reliable platform. - Attempts to Suppress Criticism:
Xpoken has been linked to efforts to silence critics and remove negative information online. Reports suggest the company may have engaged in unethical practices, such as paying for the removal of unfavorable reviews or even orchestrating cyberattacks against whistleblowers and investigative journalists. These actions raise serious ethical and legal concerns. - Reputational Harm and Motives for Suppression:
The allegations against Xpoken strike at the heart of its credibility as a trustworthy tech company. Misleading marketing and Ponzi scheme accusations undermine investor confidence, while regulatory scrutiny and cybersecurity failures portray the company as unreliable and potentially fraudulent. For a company operating in the blockchain and digital asset space, where trust and security are paramount, these issues are particularly damaging.
Xpoken’s alleged attempts to suppress negative information highlight the company’s desperation to control its public image. In an industry where reputation can make or break a business, the removal of adverse stories could create the illusion of legitimacy, allowing Xpoken to continue attracting investors and users. However, resorting to cybercrime to achieve this—such as hacking or paying for content removal—not only exacerbates the company’s ethical and legal troubles but also risks further alienating its stakeholders.
Conclusion
The allegations against Xpoken paint a troubling picture of a company willing to engage in deceptive practices and potentially illegal activities to maintain its facade of success. While Xpoken has denied many of these claims, the cumulative weight of the evidence suggests a pattern of misconduct that could have far-reaching consequences. The company’s alleged efforts to suppress criticism, including through cyber means, underscore the lengths to which it may go to protect its reputation—a move that could ultimately backfire, exposing it to greater scrutiny and legal action.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/28897420
- September 22, 2022
- Antonio Rodriguez
- https://forexnewssblog.blogspot.com/2022/04/xpoken-broker-review-how-we-exposed.html
- https://globalfraudprotection.com/scam-recovery/xpoken-review/
Evidence Box
We are investigating Xpoken for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices.
Targeted Content and Red Flags
reviews
Have you ever felt the sting of losing your hard-earned money to deceitful schemes
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with Harvard University and serves as a researcher at both Lumen and FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes. Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.
He can be reached at [email protected] directly.
Many thanks to FakeDMCA.com and Lumen for providing access to their database
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the ?back-dated article? technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a ?true original? article and back-dates it, creating a ?fake original? article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent Checks
Cyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent Investigation
Our Community
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Visit Forum
Threads Alert
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threads Alert
Recent Investigations
Aaron Sansoni Group
Investigation Ongoing
DX Exchange
Investigation Ongoing
Finxflo
Investigation Ongoing
Average Ratings
2.1
Based on 7 ratings
Rekha Yadav
Share
it is a big Fraud.Be aware do not fell for it.
Grace White
Share
I’ve been scammed by Xpoken...They promised big returns, but I never got anything back. Total waste of time and money!!!
Owen Martinez
Share
I tried to withdraw my funds from Xpoken, and they just vanished. I feel completely scammed and don’t know what to do.I put my trust in Xpoken, and it was a huge mistake.
Madison Robinson
Share
I invested a decent amount in Xpoken after seeing their 'amazing' returns, but now they’re just ignoring me and I can’t get my money back. This feels like a total scam and I’m so frustrated. They’ve lied about everything, from security to payouts. I’ve learned the hard way to be more cautious with these so-called ‘innovative’ companies.
Logan Barnes
Share
I feel compelled to share my experience with Xpoken because I don’t want others to go through what I did. This platform is deeply concerning. They are unregulated, and their lack of transparency about who they are or where they operate from is terrifying.
Mia Phillips
Share
My account is profitable, but when I try to withdraw $16,000 of my hard-earned money, no one at this company returns my calls, emails, or texts. I’ve been following up with them for months, yet I haven’t received a single response. This has been incredibly frustrating and disappointing.
Olivia Martinez
Share
Xpoken has been involved in unethical practices, withholding people's funds and making it nearly impossible to withdraw money. Personally, I invested $46,000, and when I tried to make a withdrawal, I was met with excuse after excuse, delay after delay. It became clear that Xpoken had no intention of allowing me access to my funds, which left me frustrated, anxious, and uncertain if I would ever see my investment again.