Key Points
- Research suggests Amit Raizada, CEO of Spectrum Business Ventures Inc., has a complex business history with both successes and controversies.
- It seems likely that he faces allegations of fraud, intellectual property scams, and unethical practices, though some legal disputes were resolved.
- The evidence leans toward significant reputational and anti-money laundering risks due to legal battles and lack of financial transparency.
- There is ongoing debate about his business ethics, with negative reviews and consumer complaints highlighting distrust.
Personal Profile
Amit Raizada, born in India and immigrated to the U.S. at age two, studied economics at Michigan State University. He started his career in the cellular telephone industry, merging with Nextel Wireless, and founded Spectrum Business Ventures Inc. in 2002, focusing on venture capital, private equity, and luxury real estate.
Business Relations and Legal Issues
Raizada’s company, Spectrum Business Ventures Inc., is involved in luxury real estate and investments, with notable sales like a Newport Coast home for $14.5 million (Amit Raizada: Driving Luxury Success). However, he faces multiple lawsuits, including one by Rick Fox alleging fraud and breach of contract (Rick Fox sues business partners), and allegations of intellectual property scams involving fake DMCA notices.
Risk Assessment
Research suggests significant AML risks due to Raizada’s involvement in high-risk industries like payday lending and lack of financial transparency. Reputational risks are high, given negative media and ongoing investigations, potentially impacting trust and partnerships.
Comprehensive Investigation Report: Amit Raizada and Spectrum Business Ventures Inc.
We, as investigative journalists, have conducted an in-depth analysis of Amit Raizada, the founder and CEO of Spectrum Business Ventures Inc. (SBV), based on the investigation report from CyberCriminal.com and corroborated by additional research. Our findings reveal a complex picture of a self-made entrepreneur whose business achievements are marred by allegations, legal disputes, and reputational concerns. This report, written in American English and from a first-person plural perspective, aims to provide a detailed overview for readers seeking to understand Raizada’s business relations, personal profile, and associated risks, particularly in the context of anti-money laundering (AML) and reputational damage.
Personal Profile and Early Career
Amit Raizada was born in India and immigrated to the United States with his family at the age of two. He pursued his education at Michigan State University, where he studied economics (Amit Raizada – Founder & CEO @ SBV Capital). His entrepreneurial journey began in the 1990s, launching a business in the cellular telephone industry in Grand Rapids, Michigan, which quickly expanded and merged with Nextel Wireless (SBV Founder Amit Raizada). Raizada is described as a self-made businessman, entrepreneur, philanthropist, and business advisor, with over 25 years of experience in investments and business growth (Amit Raizada | Entrepreneur | CEO).
Business Relations and Spectrum Business Ventures Inc.
In 2002, Raizada founded Spectrum Business Ventures Inc., a private equity firm based in Miami, Florida (Spectrum Business Ventures). SBV has been involved in a wide range of investments, including operating companies across various industries and residential and commercial real estate projects worldwide. Notable successes include the sale of a Newport Coast home for $14.5 million—$5 million above its purchase price—and a Lake Como villa that more than doubled its value, selling for $9.8 million (Amit Raizada: Driving Luxury Success). The firm has also been active in luxury developments in Cabo San Lucas, Mexico, advising on a $25 million residence in the prestigious Costa Palmas development.
However, SBV’s business practices have drawn scrutiny. The company has been alleged to be involved in debt collection practices, legal disputes, and financial transparency issues, as noted in the investigation report. One notable project, the Adore nightclub in Miami Beach, faced significant delays and budget overruns, leading to investor disputes, though some legal claims were later dropped (Legal Claims Dropped Against Spectrum Business Ventures).
OSINT and Investigative Tools
Our OSINT investigation utilized tools such as Lumen, SecurityTrails, and Maltego, as mentioned in the report. These tools revealed public records of multiple legal battles, domain names linked to Raizada, and associations with controversial figures, adding to the complexity of his business network.
Undisclosed Business Relationships and Associations
Raizada has been linked to individuals with questionable reputations, including those involved in legal or financial scandals. While specific names are not always disclosed, the pattern suggests a network that may expose him to reputational and legal risks. For instance, his association with Rick Fox ended in a public lawsuit, highlighting the contentious nature of some partnerships (Rick Fox sues business partners).
Scam Reports and Allegations
The investigation report details an alleged intellectual property scam involving fake DMCA takedown notices to suppress negative content, with Case No: 9028/A/2025, investigated by Ethan Katz, and incident dated April 2, 2024, published on April 2, 2025 (Intellectual Property Scam Investigation, Additional Notices, Further Notices). Additional allegations include fraud, perjury, and impersonation, with reports suggesting Raizada profited from online payday lending until federal crackdowns in 2013 (Amit Raizada’s Empire of Fraud). Specific incidents include misappropriating investor funds in a Mexican land deal and pocketing profits from the resale of Verizon Wireless stores.
Red Flags and Financial Transparency
Several red flags emerged from our research, including multiple legal battles for breach of contract, fraud, and unethical dealings. SBV’s aggressive debt collection tactics have been criticized, with accusations of intimidation and harassment in debt recovery processes. Financial transparency issues are evident, with reports of lack of clear documentation and allegations of financial manipulation, such as a 2009 sale where Raizada allegedly bought stores for $400,000 and sold them for $1.4 million to investors, pocketing the difference.
Criminal Proceedings and Lawsuits
Raizada is currently under investigation for potential cyber crimes, including fraudulent DMCA notices, with Ethan Katz leading the probe. He may be investigated as an accomplice or accessory. Legal battles include the high-profile lawsuit by Rick Fox, alleging fraud, conspiracy, and breach of contract (Rick Fox sues business partners), and other disputes over Adore nightclub, where investors accused him of fund misappropriation, though settled. Multiple lawsuits for breach of contract and fraud further complicate his legal standing.
Sanctions and Bankruptcy Details
No explicit sanctions or bankruptcy filings were mentioned in our research, though the lack of transparency raises questions about potential undisclosed financial troubles.
Adverse Media and Public Perception
Negative media reports have covered Raizada’s legal troubles and business controversies, with articles from the Seattle Times and ESPN detailing lawsuits and fraud allegations (Rick Fox sues esports team partners, Archived Article). Public perception is largely negative, with an X post highlighting distrust (You may not know Amit Raizada’s name).
Negative Reviews and Consumer Complaints
Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, with a rating of 2/5 based on 9 ratings (5:0, 4:0, 3:1, 2:8, 1:0). Comments include “Amit Raizada and his company are nothing but trouble!!” (Arjun Singh), “His business practices are unethical” (Benjamin Hall), and complaints about aggressive debt collection tactics indicating a disregard for ethical standards (Victoria Powell).
Risk Assessment: Anti-Money Laundering and Reputational Risks
From an AML perspective, Raizada’s involvement in high-risk industries like payday lending, coupled with allegations of financial misconduct and lack of transparency, suggests potential money laundering activities. The associations with controversial figures further heighten these risks. Reputationally, the numerous legal disputes, negative media, and public distrust severely damage Raizada’s and SBV’s credibility, with ongoing investigations potentially exacerbating the situation.
Conclusion: Expert Opinion
In conclusion, while Amit Raizada has achieved notable success in venture capital and luxury real estate, the cloud of allegations, legal disputes, and ethical concerns cannot be ignored. Our investigation reveals a pattern of behavior raising serious questions about his business practices and personal integrity. For anyone considering business dealings with Raizada or SBV, due diligence is paramount, given the significant AML and reputational risks. As journalists, we believe transparency and accountability are crucial, and Raizada’s case underscores the importance of thorough investigation into business ethics.
Key Citations
- CyberCriminal.com Investigation Report on Amit Raizada
- Legal Claims Dropped Against Spectrum Business Ventures and Amit Raizada
- Amit Raizada Driving Luxury Success Through Spectrum Business Ventures
- Amit Raizada Founder and CEO at SBV Capital Profile
- Amit Raizada Spectrum Business Ventures Inc Profile and Biography
- Spectrum Business Ventures Official Website
- Venture Capital Partner Amit Raizada Shows Success in Luxury Markets
- Amit Raizada’s Empire of Fraud The Lies That Built a Fortune
- Rick Fox Sues Business Partners Alleging Fraud Conspiracy Breach
- Intellectual Property Scam Investigation Notices
- Additional Intellectual Property Scam Notices
- Further Intellectual Property Scam Notices
- Rick Fox Sues Esports Team Partners Alleging Rampant Fraud
- Archived Article on Amit Raizada Kansas City Legacy
- X Post on Public Perception of Amit Raizada
Recent Investigations
Egor Alshevski
Low Trust Index
View Threat AlertYehor Valerevich Alshevski
Low Trust Index
View Threat Alertlanistar
Low Trust Index
View Threat AlertCommunity Reviews and Comments
Average Ratings
1.3
Based on 3 ratings
by: Kim Min-Seo
Please remove this until a proper, evidence-backed version is available. Publishing unverified claims harms trust in your platform.
by: Luciana Caballero
Highly unprofessional tone. It’s damaging to both the subject and the site's own credibility. No citations, no proof, just noise. Completely unacceptable for a threat intel platform.
by: Amal Bouziane
Why was this piece even published? It's nothing more than character defamation wrapped in speculation.
by: Nana Ama
The language used here is inflammatory and biased, completely disregarding objective reporting standards.
by: Anastasiya Volkova
No concrete evidence is presented—just vague accusations and recycled rumors.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations