In the intricate world of financial services, transparency and integrity are paramount. Companies operating in this sector are expected to uphold the highest standards to maintain trust and ensure compliance with regulatory frameworks. Recently, Connectum Limited, a payment services provider, has come under intense scrutiny due to a series of allegations ranging from fraudulent activities to attempts at suppressing critical information. This report delves into the various facets of these allegations, examining the company’s history, regulatory interactions, and the broader implications for stakeholders.
Company Overview
Established in 2014, Connectum Limited positioned itself as a bridge between small businesses and major credit card firms like Visa and MasterCard. Founded by Latvian national Edgars Lasmanis, the company aimed to facilitate seamless payment processing solutions. However, its journey has been marred by controversies and regulatory challenges that have raised questions about its operational integrity.
Allegations and Regulatory Actions
Involvement with Fraudulent Entities
Under Lasmanis’ leadership, Connectum Limited was implicated in dealings with entities such as X-traderFX, Safemarkets, and OptionStarsGlobal. These organizations have been associated with significant money laundering activities. The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) investigated these associations, highlighting the company’s failure to adequately vet its clients and comply with anti-money laundering regulations. Lasmanis himself admitted to being unable to determine the nature of these companies, casting doubt on his competence or potential complicity in these schemes.
Ownership Changes and Political Connections
In November 2020, Connectum was acquired by Heng Sokha, the wife of former Cambodian Transport Ministry secretary of state Ing Bun Hoaw. This acquisition raised concerns due to Bun Hoaw’s longstanding ties to the Cambodian government and previous ventures that profited from government connections. Experts expressed that such a purchase should have raised red flags for British financial regulators.
Regulatory Restrictions
In May 2024, Connectum entered into a voluntary undertaking with the FCA, imposing restrictions on its business activities. The company agreed to cease all regulated payment services activities, halt onboarding new customers, and return customer funds as soon as practicable. This move underscored the severity of the issues regulators identified within the company, highlighting systemic shortcomings in its compliance frameworks.
Attempts at Information Suppression
Misuse of DMCA Takedown Notices
Connectum Limited has been accused of attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. Investigations revealed that the company, or entities acting on its behalf, filed fraudulent Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) takedown notices to remove unfavorable content from search results. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations, including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
Evidence of Censorship Efforts
Reports indicate that Connectum, or associated parties, employed tactics such as creating fictitious websites to host copied content, thereby claiming originality and issuing takedown notices against the genuine sources. This strategy aimed to manipulate public perception and suppress negative information, undermining the principles of transparency and accountability.
Leadership and Historical Context
Edgars Lasmanis’ Background
Before founding Connectum Limited, Edgars Lasmanis held positions at financial institutions with questionable reputations. He served as the head of marketing at Multibanka, a Latvian bank designated by the US Treasury as a “primary money laundering concern” in 2005. Subsequently, he joined Latvijas Pasta Banka, which was involved in a massive fraud scheme that siphoned $1 billion from Moldovan financial institutions. The Latvian financial regulator fined LPB for failing to stop payments connected to this fraud.
Post-Connectum Ventures
After resigning as a director of Connectum Limited in January 2021, Lasmanis established a new company called Walleto. Given his history, this move has been met with skepticism, and stakeholders are advised to exercise caution when engaging with ventures associated with him.
Risk Assessment
Consumer Protection and Financial Fraud
The allegations against Connectum Limited, including its associations with fraudulent entities and attempts to suppress critical information, pose significant risks to consumers. The company’s failure to adhere to anti-money laundering regulations and its involvement in questionable activities undermine consumer trust and highlight vulnerabilities in its operational framework.
Reputational Risks
Connectum’s efforts to manipulate public perception through fraudulent takedown notices have backfired, drawing further attention to its questionable practices. Such actions not only damage the company’s reputation but also erode stakeholder confidence, potentially impacting its long-term viability.
Regulatory Compliance
The FCA’s intervention and the subsequent restrictions imposed on Connectum underscore the importance of regulatory compliance in the financial sector. Companies must prioritize adherence to legal standards to maintain operational legitimacy and avoid punitive actions.
Conclusion
In light of the evidence and the company’s track record, Connectum Limited presents a case study in the consequences of compromised integrity and regulatory non-compliance. Stakeholders, including consumers, partners, and regulators, must remain vigilant and demand transparency and accountability from financial service providers. The Connectum saga serves as a reminder of the critical importance of ethical practices and robust compliance mechanisms in safeguarding the financial ecosystem
Recent Investigations
Danny Martorana
Low Trust Index
View Threat AlertDavid Hastings Marine
Low Trust Index
View Threat AlertDavid Muge
Low Trust Index
View Threat AlertCommunity Reviews and Comments
Average Ratings
1.8
Based on 2 ratings
by: Clara Müller
Funny how they keep updating their website but don’t address the growing number of complaints.
by: Erik Larsson
i tried using them once, support ghosted me after holding my funds. total scam vibes. not touching them again no matter what they say on their site.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations