Eric Spofford

Introduction: A High-Profile Figure Under Scrutiny

We stand at a critical juncture in examining the complex and controversial story of Eric Spofford, a self-proclaimed entrepreneur, real estate investor, and former addiction treatment mogul. Known for founding Granite Recovery Centers and scaling it into one of New England’s largest addiction treatment networks, Spofford has cultivated a public persona as a recovered addict turned success story. His narrative of redemption, amplified by a robust social media presence and accolades like the Young Entrepreneur of the Year award from the U.S. Small Business Administration, has garnered both admiration and skepticism. However, beneath this polished image lies a tapestry of allegations, lawsuits, and red flags that demand rigorous scrutiny.

As investigative journalists, we have undertaken a thorough analysis of Eric Spofford’s activities, leveraging open-source intelligence (OSINT), personal profiles, adverse media, and consumer reports. Our investigation delves into suspicious business practices, undisclosed relationships, scam allegations, criminal proceedings, and reputational risks. We aim to provide a clear, evidence-based assessment for consumers, regulators, and the public, highlighting potential threats in the realms of financial fraud, consumer protection, and ethical business conduct. This report synthesizes findings from credible sources, including the referenced Cybercriminal.com investigation, to expose the truth behind Spofford’s public and private dealings.

Eric Spofford’s Background: From Addiction to Entrepreneurship

Eric Spofford’s story begins in Salem, New Hampshire, where he grew up grappling with substance abuse. By his own account, Spofford dropped out of high school at 15 and battled drug addiction for seven years, engaging in criminal activities to support his habits. At 21, he entered a 12-month rehabilitation program, achieving sobriety and setting the stage for his entrepreneurial journey. In 2008, at age 23, Spofford secured a loan with his father’s help to establish The Granite House, an 11-bed sober living facility. This venture evolved into Granite Recovery Centers (GRC), which grew into New Hampshire’s largest addiction treatment network by 2021, when Spofford sold it to BayMark Health Services for an estimated $115 million.

Today, Spofford is the CEO of Spofford Enterprises, an investment firm managing a mid-nine-figure real estate portfolio, private equity funds, a media company, and a yacht chartering business called Bonus Round Charters. He positions himself as a public speaker, author of Real People, Real Recovery, and a coach through programs like Inner Circle Elite Coaching, targeting aspiring entrepreneurs and real estate investors. His social media presence, with nearly 200,000 Instagram followers, amplifies his narrative of resilience and success.

However, Spofford’s rapid rise has not been without controversy. His past as a self-admitted criminal and addict, while central to his redemption story, raises questions about the integrity of his business practices. Our investigation uncovers a pattern of allegations and adverse media that challenge the authenticity of his public image.

Allegations of Sexual Misconduct: A Damning NHPR Investigation

The most significant controversy surrounding Eric Spofford stems from a 2022 investigation by New Hampshire Public Radio (NHPR), which uncovered multiple allegations of sexual misconduct during his tenure as CEO of Granite Recovery Centers. Published on March 22, 2022, the report by senior reporters Lauren Chooljian and Jason Moon detailed claims from former employees and a former client, painting a troubling picture of Spofford’s leadership.

Key Allegations

• 2017 Incident: A female client, referred to as “Elizabeth,” alleged that Spofford sent her explicit Snapchat messages, including photos of his penis, the day after she left GRC’s Green Mountain Treatment Center in 2017. Elizabeth, in her mid-20s with a history of heroin addiction, described Spofford’s high-profile presence at the facility, arriving by helicopter and engaging with clients. She claimed the messages began after a lunch meeting initiated by Spofford.

• 2018 Assault: A female employee, referred to as “Employee A,” alleged that Spofford sexually assaulted her in his GRC office during the workday in 2018. She also reported receiving explicit Snapchat messages from Spofford.

• 2020 Retaliation: Another employee, “Employee B,” claimed Spofford retaliated against her after she raised allegations of sexual misconduct. Multiple sources confirmed that Spofford negotiated a paid settlement with this employee, which included a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) to silence her. NHPR uncovered similar separation agreements signed by Spofford, prohibiting former employees from making “derogatory or disparaging” statements about GRC or its associates.

Supporting Testimony

The NHPR investigation included statements from over a dozen former GRC employees who claimed they were aware of Spofford’s alleged inappropriate behavior toward female staff for years. The reporters interviewed nearly 50 former clients, current and former employees, and members of New Hampshire’s recovery community. Piers Kaniuka, Spofford’s former friend, recovery sponsor, and GRC’s director of spiritual life, played a pivotal role in the report. Kaniuka stated that Spofford should face “social exclusion, humiliation, and possibly legal action” and revealed he resigned in 2020 after an employee accused Spofford of sexual assault.

However, Spofford’s lawsuit against NHPR claims Kaniuka later retracted his statements, calling them “false and devoid of firsthand information.” This retraction, if accurate, raises questions about the reliability of some sources but does not negate the broader pattern of allegations.

Spofford’s Response

Spofford vehemently denied the allegations, with his attorney Mitchell Schuster labeling the sexual assault claims “categorically untrue” and “defamatory.” Schuster threatened legal action before the report’s publication, accusing NHPR of “disingenuous reporting and malicious conduct.” Spofford did not respond to specific questions about the allegations but maintained his innocence through legal filings.

Defamation Lawsuit Against NHPR: A Battle for Reputation

In September 2022, Eric Spofford filed a defamation lawsuit against NHPR, its news director Dan Barrick, and reporters Lauren Chooljian and Jason Moon in Rockingham Superior Court. The 396-page complaint alleged that NHPR’s reporting caused severe harm to Spofford’s personal and professional reputation, resulting in emotional distress, shame, humiliation, and financial losses. Spofford claimed that banks refused to work with him, vendors severed ties with Spofford Enterprises, and New Hampshire lawmakers distanced themselves from him.

Lawsuit Details

• Claims of Malice: Spofford argued that NHPR acted with “actual malice” by knowingly publishing false information or with reckless disregard for the truth. His legal team criticized NHPR’s use of anonymous sources and questioned the credibility of reporter Lauren Chooljian’s sources, particularly alleging that Spofford’s ex-wife, Amy Anagnost, provided biased information during a custody dispute. NHPR denied using Anagnost as a source.

• Evidence Disputes: Spofford’s attorney, Michael Strauss, claimed that Chooljian never saw the alleged explicit Snapchat photos before reporting on them, casting doubt on the evidence’s legitimacy. The lawsuit also highlighted Kaniuka’s retraction as evidence of NHPR’s reliance on unreliable sources.

• Court Rulings: In April 2023, Rockingham Superior Court Judge Daniel St. Hilaire dismissed Spofford’s lawsuit, finding no evidence of actual malice in NHPR’s reporting. However, Spofford was allowed to amend his complaint and seek discovery materials, including interview transcripts, to prove malice. After reviewing 2,900 pages of NHPR records in December 2023, St. Hilaire concluded that the documents reflected “professional and diligent reporting” and contained “no viable basis” for Spofford’s claims.

NHPR’s Defense

NHPR stood by its reporting, with President and CEO Jim Schachter calling the court’s ruling a “vindication.” The station argued that Spofford’s lawsuit was an intimidation tactic to silence journalists and their sources. The ACLU, New England First Amendment Coalition, and several local newspapers filed amicus briefs in support of NHPR, emphasizing the importance of protecting journalistic integrity.

Implications

The dismissal of Spofford’s lawsuit suggests that NHPR’s investigation was conducted with due diligence, but the lack of concrete evidence (e.g., the unseen Snapchat photos) leaves room for debate. Spofford’s aggressive legal response, including notifying interviewees of impending lawsuits the day after the report’s publication, raises concerns about potential intimidation tactics.

Vandalism Incidents: A Troubling Connection

A disturbing series of vandalism incidents targeting NHPR journalists followed the publication of the Spofford investigation, raising suspicions of retaliation. Between April and May 2022, the homes of Lauren Chooljian, Dan Barrick, and their families were vandalized with bricks, rocks, and red spray paint, including an ominous message, “JUST THE BEGINNING,” scrawled on Chooljian’s home.

Federal Investigation

In 2023, federal prosecutors charged four men—Tucker Cockerline, Michael Waselchuck, Keenan Saniatan, and Eric Labarge—with conspiring to commit stalking through interstate travel. Labarge, described as Spofford’s “close personal associate” and the owner of several recovery centers, was investigated as a suspect in at least one incident. Prosecutors alleged that the vandalism was coordinated with an unnamed individual linked to Spofford, though Spofford himself has not been charged or accused of direct involvement.

Spofford’s Denial

Spofford’s attorney, Howard Cooper, stated that no federal agency has questioned Spofford about the vandalism. Spofford speculated that the acts might have been committed by someone associated with Chooljian, a claim dismissed by NHPR as an attempt to deflect blame.

Impact on NHPR

The vandalism incidents prompted NHPR to invest heavily in security upgrades, including systems, professional consultations, and guards, costing “well into the six figures.” The station also launched a podcast, The 13th Step, hosted by Chooljian, to explore the investigation and the challenges faced by the news organization.

Red Flag

The connection between Spofford’s associate and the vandalism, combined with the timing of the incidents, constitutes a significant red flag. While Spofford has not been directly implicated, the association with individuals charged in a federal case undermines his credibility and raises concerns about his professional network.

Business Practices and Financial Risks

Eric Spofford’s business ventures, particularly through Spofford Enterprises, warrant scrutiny for potential financial and consumer risks. His focus on real estate, Section 8 investing, and entrepreneurial coaching programs presents both opportunities and pitfalls.

Granite Recovery Centers: Ethical Concerns

Spofford’s sale of GRC to BayMark Health Services in 2021 for an estimated $115 million was a financial triumph, but the allegations of misconduct during his tenure raise ethical questions. NHPR’s investigation suggested that Spofford used NDAs to suppress damaging allegations, potentially prioritizing profit over accountability. The lack of transparency about the sale and BayMark’s refusal to comment on pre-ownership allegations further obscure the company’s operational history.

Section 8 Investing: High Reward, High Risk

Spofford promotes Section 8 real estate investing through Spofford Enterprises, targeting landlord-friendly states for single-family homes rented to Section 8 tenants. He highlights the benefits of steady government-backed rent payments and high demand for affordable housing. However, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) notes that 75% of eligible households do not receive Section 8 vouchers, and waitlists can extend up to two years due to underfunding. This creates risks for investors relying on consistent tenant occupancy.

Coaching Programs: Inner Circle and Cash Flow is King

Spofford’s Inner Circle Elite Coaching and Cash Flow is King programs target aspiring entrepreneurs with promises of tactical business advice and community support. While Spofford has positive reviews for his coaching, the high cost of such programs and the lack of transparent success metrics raise concerns. Similar coaching models have been criticized for overpromising results, particularly when targeting vulnerable populations like recovering addicts or novice investors.

Undisclosed Relationships

Spofford’s political connections, including his advisory role to Governor Chris Sununu on opioid policy, add complexity to his profile. GRC received over $3 million in no-bid contracts under Sununu’s administration, and Spofford donated tens of thousands to Sununu’s campaigns. These ties, while not inherently illicit, suggest potential conflicts of interest that merit further investigation.

Adverse Media and Consumer Complaints

Adverse media reports, primarily from NHPR and outlets like NH Journal and The Boston Globe, dominate the narrative around Spofford. The Cybercriminal.com investigation, while referenced, lacks specific details about Spofford beyond general allegations of suspicious activities, limiting its utility.

Negative Reviews

• Gripeo.com: A 2023 post on Gripeo.com discusses Spofford’s lawsuit against NHPR, framing it as a response to allegations that could indicate a scam. The site encourages users to share insights about Spofford, but no direct consumer complaints are documented.

• Social Media Scrutiny: Spofford’s large social media following (over a million across platforms) has been both a strength and a liability. Critics on platforms like X have questioned the authenticity of his redemption narrative, particularly in light of the NHPR allegations, though no widespread consumer complaints have emerged.

Bankruptcy and Sanctions

Our investigation found no records of bankruptcy filings or sanctions against Eric Spofford or his businesses as of March 27, 2025. This absence suggests financial stability but does not negate reputational risks from ongoing controversies.

Risk Assessment: Consumer Protection and Financial Fraud

Consumer Protection Risks

• Vulnerable Populations: Spofford’s work in addiction treatment and coaching targets vulnerable groups, including recovering addicts and novice investors. The allegations of sexual misconduct and use of NDAs at GRC suggest a potential disregard for ethical standards, posing risks to clients and employees.

• Coaching Programs: High-cost coaching programs like Inner Circle Elite may exploit aspirational individuals with promises of wealth. Without transparent success metrics, consumers risk financial loss on unproven guidance.

Financial Fraud Risks

• Opaque Business Dealings: The lack of financial transparency in GRC’s sale and Spofford Enterprises’ real estate portfolio raises concerns about potential shell companies or undisclosed partnerships. While no direct evidence of fraud exists, the complexity of Spofford’s ventures warrants scrutiny.

• Section 8 Investing: The reliance on Section 8 tenants introduces financial risks due to program underfunding and long waitlists, potentially affecting investors following Spofford’s strategies.

Reputational Risks

• Sexual Misconduct Allegations: The NHPR investigation and subsequent media coverage have severely damaged Spofford’s reputation, impacting his ability to secure business partnerships and maintain public trust.

• Vandalism Connection: The association with Eric Labarge and the vandalism incidents, even without direct charges, further erodes Spofford’s credibility and suggests a problematic professional network.

• Political Ties: Spofford’s ties to Governor Sununu and no-bid contracts raise questions about favoritism, potentially alienating stakeholders who value impartiality.

Criminal Reports

While Spofford has no recent criminal convictions, his admitted history of criminal activity to support drug addiction and the vandalism investigation linked to his associate constitute significant red flags. The absence of direct charges does not fully mitigate these concerns.

Expert Opinion: A Cautionary Tale

As investigative journalists, we conclude that Eric Spofford presents a multifaceted risk profile marked by serious allegations, opaque business practices, and reputational challenges. The NHPR investigation into sexual misconduct, supported by multiple sources, casts a long shadow over Spofford’s legacy as an addiction treatment leader. While his defamation lawsuit was dismissed for lack of evidence of malice, the court’s findings do not exonerate him from the underlying allegations. The vandalism incidents, linked to his associate, further complicate his narrative, suggesting a network that may engage in or tolerate aggressive tactics.

From a consumer protection standpoint, Spofford’s ventures—particularly his coaching programs and Section 8 investing strategies—require cautious evaluation. The high costs and lack of transparent outcomes in his coaching programs, combined with the financial risks of Section 8 investing, pose potential threats to consumers, especially those in vulnerable positions. His political connections and the use of NDAs at GRC raise ethical concerns about accountability and transparency.

For investors, regulators, and the public, Eric Spofford’s story serves as a cautionary tale. His entrepreneurial success is undeniable, but the red flags—allegations of misconduct, questionable business practices, and adverse media—cannot be ignored. We recommend that consumers exercise extreme caution when engaging with Spofford’s businesses, verify claims independently, and monitor ongoing legal and media developments. Regulators should consider closer scrutiny of his investment and coaching ventures to ensure compliance with consumer protection standards.

In the absence of definitive evidence of financial fraud or recent criminal activity, Spofford remains a polarizing figure: a symbol of redemption for some, and a cautionary example of unchecked ambition for others. The truth, as always, lies in the details, and our investigation underscores the need for continued vigilance.

References

1. Intelligence Line. (2025). Fraud Accusations on Eric Spofford: The Full Story.

2. Finance Scam. (2024). Eric Spofford: A Sex Culprit?

3. Intelligence Line. (2024). Eric Spofford: Facing Sexual Misconduct Allegations and Criticism.

4. New Hampshire Public Radio. (2022). NHPR Investigation Reveals Sexual Misconduct Allegations Involving Eric Spofford.

5. NH Journal. (2023). NHPR: Spofford Defamation Lawsuit About Retaliation.

6. The Boston Globe. (2023). Judge Digs Through 2,900 Pages of NHPR Records, Finds No Basis for Eric Spofford’s Defamation Claims.

7. Gripeo.com. (2023). Eric Spofford Files Lawsuit Against NHPR: Is He Innocent?

8. Ippei.com. (2024). Eric Spofford Review: Is Section 8 Investing Profitable?

9. Cybercriminal.com. (2024). Investigation: Eric Spofford.

10. NH Journal. (2022). Court Docs: Spofford’s Disgruntled Ex Gave NHPR Abuse Story.