CyberCriminal.com

1xBet

We are investigating 1xBet for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : 1xBet

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 29 Aug 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 8346/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 8 Apr 2025

1xBet
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about 1xBet in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into 1xBet over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that 1xBet - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

1xBet’s journey is a textbook case of how not to conduct business in the gambling industry. Despite its global ambitions, the company has repeatedly found itself on the wrong side of the law. In 2019, the UK Gambling Commission (UKGC) launched an investigation into 1xBet following a report by The Sunday Times. The allegations were damning: promoting betting on under-19 athletic competitions, advertising on prohibited sites, and even offering a “pornhub casino” featuring topless croupiers.

The company’s response? A classic blame game. They pointed fingers at third-party partners, claiming these affiliates acted without their knowledge or consent. It’s a convenient excuse, but one that doesn’t absolve them of responsibility. After all, if you invite the fox into the henhouse, you can’t feign surprise when feathers fly.

The Art of Misdirection: Censorship Tactics Unveiled

When faced with mounting criticism, 1xBet didn’t opt for transparency or reform. Instead, they allegedly embarked on a campaign to erase negative coverage from the internet. Investigations have revealed that the company, or entities acting on its behalf, misused DMCA takedown notices to suppress unfavorable content. This tactic, which involves impersonation, fraud, and perjury, is a blatant attempt to manipulate public perception and sanitize their online presence.

Such actions aren’t just unethical; they’re illegal. By fraudulently claiming copyright infringement, 1xBet sought to silence critics and prevent potential investors from seeing the red flags waving vigorously in the wind. It’s the digital equivalent of sweeping dirt under a rug that’s already on fire.

A Global Web of Deceit

The company’s questionable activities aren’t confined to the UK. Investigations by independent groups like Bellingcat and football magazine Josimar have exposed 1xBet’s involvement in organizing and streaming thousands of amateur sports events, some involving minors. These events, including matches with fictitious teams, were portrayed as legitimate sporting events to lure unsuspecting bettors.

Despite these controversies, 1xBet managed to secure sponsorship deals with prestigious football clubs like Paris Saint-Germain and FC Barcelona. It’s a perplexing move, akin to hiring a fox as a security consultant for the henhouse.

The Illusion of Compliance

In response to the myriad allegations, 1xBet has consistently maintained that it operates within the bounds of the law. They’ve claimed that any infractions are the result of rogue third-party affiliates and that they are committed to responsible gambling practices.

However, these assertions ring hollow when juxtaposed against their actions. A company truly committed to ethical operations wouldn’t need to resort to censorship or associate with dubious partners. It’s like a magician insisting he’s not performing tricks while palming cards in plain sight.

A Call to Action for Authorities and Investors

The case of 1xBet serves as a stark reminder of the need for vigilance in the gambling industry. Regulatory bodies must intensify their scrutiny and hold companies accountable for their actions, both overt and covert. Allowing such entities to operate with impunity not only undermines the integrity of the industry but also puts consumers at risk.

Potential investors should heed these warning signs. Investing in a company that engages in unethical practices is a gamble with long odds and high stakes. It’s imperative to conduct thorough due diligence and look beyond the glossy facade that companies like 1xBet present.

A Trail of Legal Troubles

1xBet’s legal woes are as widespread as their advertising campaigns. In Russia, the company’s founders faced criminal investigations for illegal gambling activities between 2014 and 2019, leading to international arrest warrants. One of the founders reportedly died in Switzerland in 2023, adding a mysterious twist to the saga. Despite these setbacks, 1xBet continued its operations, shifting focus to markets in Africa, South America, and India.

The United Kingdom wasn’t spared either. In 2019, following a damning investigation by The Sunday Times, the UK Gambling Commission suspended 1xBet’s license. The exposé revealed the company’s involvement in promoting a “pornhub casino” featuring topless croupiers, bets on children’s sports, and advertising on illegal streaming websites. Such revelations led to Premier League clubs Chelsea, Liverpool, and Tottenham Hotspur distancing themselves from sponsorship deals with the tainted bookmaker.

Questionable Business Practices

Beyond legal battles, 1xBet’s operational ethics are highly suspect. The company has been accused of hosting thousands of live-streamed amateur sports events, some involving fictitious teams and players as young as 14. This practice not only raises ethical concerns but also questions about the integrity of the bets placed on such events.

Moreover, 1xBet’s association with illegal streaming platforms has drawn the ire of major sports broadcasters. In India, Star India filed a First Information Report (FIR) against the company for illegally live-streaming the ICC Champions Trophy matches without permission. Such blatant disregard for intellectual property rights further tarnishes 1xBet’s already sullied reputation.​

Attempts to Suppress Negative Information

Perhaps most concerning is 1xBet’s alleged strategy to muzzle criticism. Reports indicate that the company has attempted to conceal critical reviews and adverse news by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. These actions, which could involve impersonation, fraud, and perjury, suggest a deliberate effort to manipulate public perception and suppress dissenting voices. Such tactics are not only unethical but also indicative of a company desperate to keep its questionable practices out of the spotlight.

Conclusion

1xBet’s trajectory is a cautionary tale of how a company’s relentless pursuit of profit can lead it down a path of ethical compromises and legal violations. Their attempts to censor adverse media and manipulate public perception are not just signs of a company in crisis but also a clarion call for regulatory intervention. As an investigative journalist, I’ve seen many corporate contortions, but 1xBet’s blend of audacity and duplicity is truly a masterclass in how not to conduct business.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44183379
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/33595303
  • August 29, 2024
  • April 21, 2023
  • Lucas Elliott
  • REDACTED
  • https://corruptions.ru/ohota-na-1xbet-czentrobank-nakryl-v-kazani-bukmekerskoe-logovo/
  • https://josimarfootball.com/bankrupt-and-expanding/
  • https://mkam.business-gazeta.ru/article/502279
  • https://knipselkrant-curacao.com/landen/curacao/josimar-1xbet-bankrupt-and-expanding/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

gamblingnews.com

Bellingcat Investigation Delves Into 1XBet’s Dark Secrets

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

thehimalayantimes.com

Case filed against 11 including actors in 1xBet scam

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

bookmakersreview.com

1xBet FRAUD

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login