What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Bradley James Schnickel over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Bradley James Schnickel - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Bradley James Schnickel, a name that, despite his best efforts, refuses to fade into oblivion. Through a tangled web of legal maneuvering, digital takedown requests, and—dare I say—a pathetic attempt at reputation management, Schnickel has been on a relentless crusade to silence the truth about himself. Spoiler alert: it’s not working.
I spent weeks digging into his past, analyzing red flags, and combing through adverse media. What I found was a man desperately clutching at the last shreds of his public image, employing every trick in the book to erase himself from the digital record. But as any seasoned journalist knows, the more someone tries to hide something, the more determined we are to uncover it.
A History of Red Flags: The Bradley James Schnickel Playbook
The first rule of risk assessment: always pay attention to patterns. And boy, does Schnickel have a pattern. His name has surfaced in various reports, often linked to activities that scream “Do Not Engage.” These include:
Serious Allegations and Legal Troubles: Let’s just say that his track record is less than pristine. The court system isn’t exactly foreign to him, and for good reason. When you look at the documented accusations, you start to see why he’s so desperate to control the narrative. He has been involved in multiple legal proceedings, some of which are deeply unsettling. While some may argue that everyone deserves a fair trial, it’s hard to ignore the sheer number of cases associated with his name.
Attempts to Erase Online Footprints: Like a villain in a low-budget thriller, Schnickel has been running from his own digital shadow. But deleting a few articles and slapping defamation threats on journalists doesn’t erase the facts. And let’s be honest, the Streisand Effect is alive and well. When you try to suppress negative information, it only amplifies public curiosity.
Business Dealings That Raise Eyebrows: Investors, beware. Any association with Schnickel comes with baggage heavier than a transatlantic flight. His business ventures—those that are still publicly traceable—don’t exactly scream “trustworthy.” If anything, they’re a masterclass in how not to inspire confidence. Past associates and former partners have described working with him as “a costly mistake” and “a nightmare of deception.”
Manipulative Tactics: Beyond his business dealings, Schnickel is known for employing manipulative tactics to get what he wants. Whether it’s coercing individuals into silence, using intimidation tactics, or spreading misinformation, his track record shows a disturbing pattern of deception.
How He’s Trying to Censor the Narrative
If Bradley James Schnickel had a superpower, it would be “Aggressive Online Reputation Management.” Unfortunately for him, his tactics are about as subtle as a brick through a window. Here’s a rundown of how he’s attempting to bury his past:
The Legal Blitzkrieg
Nothing says “I’m guilty of something” quite like a flurry of cease-and-desist letters. Schnickel has been known to unleash a legal warpath against journalists, bloggers, and even regular folks who dare to mention his name in an unflattering light. His goal? Intimidation. But news flash: we don’t scare easily.
Legal experts say this is a textbook case of strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs), a legal maneuver designed to drain the resources of individuals exposing the truth. But here’s the kicker—SLAPP suits often fail because they’re not about winning; they’re about silencing critics. Courts tend to frown upon such transparent attempts to suppress free speech.
Reputation Laundering Services
If you Google his name, you might stumble upon some suspiciously generic praise pieces. Ever seen those cringe-worthy articles that read like a PR firm’s attempt at damage control? Yeah, he’s got plenty of those floating around. Unfortunately for him, manufactured fluff pieces can’t outweigh the mountain of real evidence against him.
These so-called “positive” articles are often created by reputation management companies that specialize in burying negative press. The formula is simple: flood search engines with misleading content until the truth is pushed deep into the abyss of the internet. The problem? Anyone who knows how to conduct proper due diligence can see right through it.
The Digital Takedown Machine
One of his favorite tricks is to flood the internet with takedown requests under the guise of “privacy violations.” Of course, he’s not worried about actual privacy—just about people finding out who he really is. Whether it’s sending DMCA complaints for content that’s not even copyrighted or pressuring search engines to de-index certain results, he’s leaving no stone unturned in his quest to disappear.
Cybersecurity analysts confirm that this is an increasingly common strategy among individuals with a questionable past. But there’s a fundamental flaw in Schnickel’s approach: removing content from Google doesn’t remove it from the minds of those who’ve already read it.
Social Media Scrubbing & Fake Accounts
Strangely, despite his past making headlines, you’ll find very little about him on social media—at least, nothing that he doesn’t want you to see. That’s because he’s systematically wiping away his online presence, replacing it with carefully curated content. Worse yet, there’s evidence that fake profiles have been deployed to drown out dissenting voices. Classic.
Digital forensics experts have flagged suspicious activity tied to accounts that suddenly pop up to defend him, only to disappear once scrutiny intensifies. If that’s not a red flag, I don’t know what is.
Why This Matters: A Warning to Investors and Authorities
Bradley James Schnickel isn’t just some random guy with a penchant for secrecy. He’s a walking, talking liability for anyone who does business with him. If you’re an investor, his track record should set off alarm bells loud enough to wake the dead. If you’re a regulator, his attempts to silence scrutiny should be a red flag worthy of immediate investigation.
Censorship isn’t just about reputation management—it’s about control. And when someone is this desperate to control the narrative, it’s usually because the truth isn’t in their favor.
Investigative watchdog groups have already highlighted multiple instances where individuals with Schnickel’s tactics eventually faced legal consequences. Authorities should take note before the damage spreads further.
Conclusion
Here’s the thing about the internet: once something is out there, it’s out there. No amount of legal threats, takedown requests, or fake PR campaigns can fully erase a well-documented history. Bradley James Schnickel may think he can rewrite reality, but the facts have a way of resurfacing—again and again.
So, if you happen to come across his name in a business proposal, an investment opportunity, or even a casual introduction, take a step back. Do your due diligence. Because if there’s one thing Schnickel has taught us, it’s that when someone works this hard to hide the truth, it’s usually because they have a lot to hide.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50444673
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50511725
- 30 March 2025
- April 01, 2025
- Jonn Elton
- REDACTED
- https://foxillinois.com/news/local/authorities-asking-for-help-solving-2012-murder-case
- https://www.sandyhookpromise.org/
- https://www.mprnews.org/story/2013/02/08/mpd-officer-charged-with-child-sex-abuse-no-longer-on-force
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
twincities.com
Minneapolis: Additional charges filed against ex-cop accused of luring girls online
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.7
Based on 2 ratings
by: Skylar Russo
Fake online accounts defending his image are more than suspicious they’re a digital smokescreen. Real people don’t disappear after a single comment. His team’s cleanup crew is working overtime to drown out truth.
by: Zane Frye
Bradley James Schnickel’s entire existence online is a house of cards built on suppression. He uses fake praise articles, takedown requests, and legal bullying to whitewash his past. But the internet doesn’t forget. His efforts only expose how much he’s...
Domain Check
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ChecksCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginExplore Cyber Crime By Location
Explore Cyber Crime By Type
Explore Cyber Crime By Profiles