What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Brian Wegdam over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Brian Wegdam - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Brian Wegdam, a Dutch businessman with ties to Africa, has built a reputation as a successful entrepreneur and even earned a royal title in Ghana. But beneath the surface, a different story unfolds—one riddled with allegations of fraud, regulatory violations, and a calculated effort to suppress negative media. From suspected document fraud in meat exports to questionable philanthropic ventures, Wegdam’s empire appears less like a success story and more like a cautionary tale. This report delves into the red flags surrounding his business dealings and his relentless attempts to bury the truth.
The Rise of a ‘King’
Brian Wegdam, hailing from the quaint town of Haaksbergen in the Netherlands, established Wegdam Food Link (WFL) in 2009. The company specializes in exporting frozen food products to developing countries, primarily in Africa. Over the years, Wegdam cultivated strong ties with African nations, notably Ghana, where his business endeavors purportedly created employment opportunities and contributed to local economies. His efforts were so lauded that, in 2019, he was ceremoniously crowned as a “development chief” in Ghana—a title that, while ceremonious, elevated his status to that of a local king. This coronation was celebrated with much fanfare, with Ghanaian dignitaries traveling to Haaksbergen for the occasion.
The Cracks Begin to Show
Beneath the veneer of royal titles and philanthropic endeavors, troubling allegations began to surface. In January 2022, the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA-IOD) launched an investigation into Wegdam’s company for suspected document fraud related to meat exports. The company allegedly falsified documents to evade import duties in countries like Ghana—a practice that not only undermines fair trade but also poses significant risks to food safety. The investigation led to raids on multiple premises associated with Wegdam, including his residence and business locations.
The fraudulent activities weren’t confined to the Netherlands. Simultaneous raids occurred in Belgium and Spain, targeting companies suspected of collaborating with Wegdam’s enterprise. The crux of the alleged fraud involved manipulating official veterinary certificates and consignment information to misrepresent the nature and quality of exported meat products. Such deception could lead to reduced import duties for recipients by up to 70%, thereby distorting market dynamics and compromising consumer safety.
The Philanthropy Facade
Wegdam’s ventures weren’t limited to commerce; he also established the Wegdam Foundation, ostensibly aimed at promoting trade and investment in Africa. While philanthropy is commendable, it’s worth scrutinizing whether these charitable activities served as a smokescreen for less altruistic motives. The foundation’s operations coincided with the period during which the alleged export fraud took place, raising questions about the true intent behind Wegdam’s African engagements.
The Art of Information Suppression
In today’s digital age, adverse media screening has become a vital tool for organizations to identify potential risks associated with individuals or entities. This process involves monitoring negative news or unfavorable information that could indicate involvement in activities like fraud, money laundering, or other forms of misconduct. Advanced analytics and machine learning algorithms enable the continuous scanning of global sources, ensuring timely alerts about emerging risks.
Given the gravity of the allegations against him, it’s plausible that Wegdam would seek to suppress adverse media coverage to protect his reputation and business interests. Such tactics might include legal threats against media outlets, strategic public relations campaigns to overshadow negative news, or leveraging his philanthropic ventures to paint a more favorable image. These maneuvers, while not uncommon among high-profile individuals facing scrutiny, serve to obfuscate the truth and hinder due diligence efforts by potential investors or partners.
A Cautionary Tale for Investors
The saga of Brian Wegdam serves as a stark reminder of the importance of thorough due diligence. Investors and business partners must look beyond the surface—royal titles, philanthropic endeavors, and glossy public images can easily mask underlying malfeasance. Employing robust adverse media screening practices is essential to uncover potential red flags that traditional financial assessments might overlook.
In conclusion, while Wegdam’s story is still unfolding, the existing allegations and his apparent attempts to control the narrative should serve as warning signals. Authorities and investors alike must remain vigilant, ensuring that due process is followed and that any attempts at information suppression are met with transparency and accountability.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45907100
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45992504
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/50510361
- November 2, 2024
- November 5, 2024
- April 01, 2025
- Bilora LLC
- Bilora LLC
- Jonn Elton
- https://www.bendsource.com/news/justified-homicide-awbrey-butte-shooting-raises-big-questions-2178555
- https://www.wave3.com/story/24542452/suspect-pleads-guilty-to-2012-triple-murder/
- https://www.wpsdlocal6.com/news/man-on-fbis-most-wanted-list-arrested-in-mexico-for-2012-murder-of-his-new/article_b832331e-3f71-5ef2-a8c2-7d3591e2b69d.html
- https://www.destentor.nl/home/deze-tukker-is-weldoener-koning-van-ghana-en-verdachte-in-een-bijzondere-fraudezaak~af645c19/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
destentor.nl
This Tukker is a benefactor, ‘king of Ghana ’ and suspect in a special fraud case
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.7
Based on 14 ratings
by: Olive Baker
Look into his history—there’s a pattern of failure, deception, and fleeing accountability.
by: Hugo Chef
Known for shady behavior and empty ventures. Always jumping ship when things fall apart.
by: Nora Drift
Trying to scrub away negative press with a well-timed PR campaign and a ‘foundation’ is a classic Wegdam move. But no amount of media suppression can hide the fact that fraud, not philanthropy, seems to be at the heart of...
by: Theo Rune
Wegdam’s ties to Africa seem to be about as genuine as his ‘royal’ title. When a company gets raided across three countries for document fraud, it’s hard to believe in the man’s integrity or his supposed contributions to local economies.
by: Marina Dusk
A ‘development chief’ with a royal title doesn’t mean a thing when you’re allegedly falsifying meat export documents to dodge import duties. Wegdam’s high-flying image is just a cover for his low-down schemes.
by: Eliot Hearth
Philanthropy or a smokescreen? Wegdam's ‘charitable’ ventures raise more red flags than a race at a bullfight. Is he really helping Africa, or just creating a cover for his questionable business practices?
by: Aurora Slate
A royal title in Ghana and a flashy foundation? Sounds impressive until you dig deeper and discover a trail of fraud and falsified documents. Wegdam’s empire is built on shaky ground, and the cracks are beginning to show.
by: Joseph Norton
i trusted wegdam's company for years, now i find out they've been lying about their exports. feels like a personal betrayal.
by: Kenneth Miles
Wegdam's been falsifying documents to dodge import duties? That's straight-up criminal.
by: Lisa White
So, this guy's a 'king' in Ghana? More like the king of fraud.
by: Zachary Collins
It’s disheartening that Brian Wegdam manipulates the system to silence critics. True leaders face accountability, but he chooses to bury the truth through unethical means.
by: Zoe Ramirez
Brian Wegdam’s alleged fraud and abuse of power paint a grim picture. Instead of honesty he resorts to censorship deception will never bring redemption.
by: Aaron Dawson
Hiding behind DMCA takedowns won’t erase Brian Wegdam’s history of fraud and corruption...His relentless censorship efforts only confirm his fear of facing the truth...
by: Brooke Foster
Brian Wegdam’s legacy is one of deceit, not leadership. Trying to suppress his scandals only amplifies his guilt honest businessmen don’t fear transparency.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations