CyberCriminal.com

Brius Healthcare

We are investigating Brius Healthcare for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Brius Healthcare

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 01 May 2022

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 6583/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 16 Mar 2025

Brius Healthcare
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Brius Healthcare in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Brius Healthcare over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Brius Healthcare - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Brius Healthcare, California’s largest nursing home operator, has been at the center of numerous controversies ranging from patient neglect to financial improprieties. Founded by Shlomo Rechnitz, Brius has expanded its reach across the state, acquiring numerous facilities. However, this growth has been accompanied by a series of alarming incidents and allegations that raise serious concerns about the company’s operations and its attempts to suppress negative information.

A Troubled History of Patient Care

Brius Healthcare’s facilities have been repeatedly cited for substandard care. In 2014, the Sacramento Bee reported that Brius-owned nursing homes had nearly triple the number of serious deficiencies per 1,000 beds compared to the statewide average. These deficiencies included inadequate staffing, failure to provide a safe environment, and not treating residents with dignity and respect. Such consistent patterns of neglect suggest systemic issues within the organization.

Legal Battles and Financial Penalties

The company’s legal troubles are extensive. In 2016, four San Diego-area nursing homes owned by Brius agreed to pay up to $6.9 million to resolve allegations of paying kickbacks for patient referrals and submitting fraudulent bills to government healthcare programs. This settlement underscores the company’s questionable business practices and its willingness to engage in unethical behavior to boost profits.

Additionally, in 2017, the California Department of Public Health denied Brius’s request to operate five skilled nursing facilities, citing 386 serious patient care violations over the previous three years. This decision reflects regulatory recognition of the company’s failure to meet basic care standards.

Attempts to Suppress Negative Information

Brius Healthcare has not only been embroiled in controversies but has also allegedly attempted to suppress negative information about its operations. Reports indicate that the company engaged in fraudulent copyright takedown requests to remove unfavorable content from the internet. Such actions suggest a deliberate effort to manipulate public perception and avoid accountability.

Unethical Business Practices and Shell Companies

Brius Healthcare’s labyrinthine corporate structure is a case study in obfuscation. The company’s ownership and financial arrangements are shrouded in a complex web of shell companies, making it difficult for regulators and the public to trace accountability. This opacity allows Brius to shield itself from liability while maximizing profits. Reports suggest that owner Shlomo Rechnitz has used these shell entities to move money around, minimizing taxes and hiding assets. Such maneuvers are not illegal on their own but raise ethical questions—especially when patient care suffers as a result. If Brius can’t be transparent about its finances, how can it be trusted to deliver quality care?

The Staffing Crisis: Profits Over Patients

One of the most persistent criticisms of Brius Healthcare is its chronic understaffing, a problem that seems intentional rather than accidental. By maintaining minimal staffing levels, Brius reduces labor costs and boosts profits, but the impact on patient care is devastating. Overworked and underpaid employees struggle to meet even basic standards of care. Multiple investigations have revealed that Brius facilities frequently fall short of the required nurse-to-patient ratios, leading to neglect and preventable harm. It’s a grim reality: Brius’s business model hinges on cutting corners at the expense of vulnerable residents. It’s hard not to wonder if their motto should be “Profits Over Patients.”

Regulatory Evasion and Political Influence

Brius Healthcare’s ability to continue operating despite a staggering record of violations points to a concerning level of regulatory leniency. Critics argue that Brius leverages political donations and high-powered legal teams to evade meaningful scrutiny. In 2016, the California Department of Public Health denied Brius’s bid to acquire additional nursing homes, citing severe care deficiencies. Yet, Brius remains a dominant player in the industry. The company’s knack for navigating regulatory loopholes and influencing oversight agencies has left residents vulnerable. It begs the question: Why hasn’t the state done more to hold Brius accountable?

Conclusion

The extensive history of patient care violations, legal disputes, and attempts to censor criticism paints a troubling picture of Brius Healthcare. Potential investors should exercise extreme caution, and regulatory authorities must intensify scrutiny to ensure the safety and well-being of residents in Brius-operated facilities. The company’s pattern of behavior indicates a prioritization of profit over patient care, raising serious ethical and legal concerns.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/27411288
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/24189043
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25492918
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/26361417
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/25487441
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/24873004
  • May 01, 2022
  • June 17, 2021
  • October 18, 2021
  • January 06, 2022
  • October 18, 2021
  • August 17, 2021
  • Shane Garcia
  • Ruth Schneider
  • Mauricio Krizman
  • Michael Shockley
  • Henry Martin
  • Boris Groendahl
  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shlomo_Rechnitz
  • https://www.times-standard.com/2017/06/29/state-to-audit-nursing-home-companys-use-of-public-funds/
  • https://legalmauriciokrizman.tumblr.com/post/665207487621955584/profit-scheme-amasses-millions-for-california
  • https://legalmichaelshockley-blog.tumblr.com/post/672621409939472384/profit-scheme-amasses-millions-for-california
  • https://legalhenrymartin.tumblr.com/post/665209191004258304/new-law-inspired-by-brius-healthcare-owner-of-4
  • https://borisgroendahl.livejournal.com/765.html
  • https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/12/31/brius-nursing-home/
  • https://lostmessiahdotcom.wordpress.com/tag/shlomo-rechnitz/page/2/
  • https://seniorjustice.com/profit-scheme-amasses-millions-for-california-nursing-home-chain-brius-healthcare/
  • https://www.times-standard.com/2018/09/14/new-law-inspired-by-brius-healthcare-owner-of-4-humboldt-county-nursing-homes/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

healthcare-fraud-lawyer

San Diego Nursing Homes Pay $6.9 million for Health Care Fraud

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

nursinghomelawcenter

Brius Healthcare Violations & Lawsuits

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

justice.gov

San Diego Nursing Homes Owned by L.A.-Based Brius Management to Pay up to $6.9 Million to Resolve Kickback and Fraud Allegations

  • Removed
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login