CyberCriminal.com

CapTrade LTD

We are investigating CapTrade LTD for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : CapTrade LTD

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 30 Apr 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 3454/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 14 Jun 2025

CapTrade LTD
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about CapTrade LTD in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into CapTrade LTD over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that CapTrade LTD - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

CapTrade LTD is the kind of name that tries to sound like a respectable financial institution—but peel back the glossy homepage, and what you find is more con than company. In the course of my investigation, what began as a routine due diligence review quickly spiraled into a rabbit hole of red flags: bogus regulatory claims, fake returns, account freezes, and a censorship strategy so aggressive it would make a dictator blush. CapTrade isn’t just hiding shady practices—it’s systematically erasing evidence of them. And for a firm that claims to trade futures, its own future should come with a warning label.

Identity and Regulation: Smoke, Mirrors, and Offshore Ploys

CapTrade LTD claims legitimacy, but its façade crumbles under scrutiny. Scam-review platforms like ScamAdviser flag a “low trust score”, citing poor domain age, hidden WHOIS data, and shared hosting on offshore servers—classic hallmarks of a fraudulent operation . Worse, FraudNotify bluntly dubs CapTrade a “scam from an anonymous group of scammers” that continuously churns out pseudo-broker websites .

Despite lofty marketing, genuine regulators—FCA, SEC, ASIC—are nowhere to be seen. FraudNotify underscores: “Cap Trade is an offshore broker … lack of regulation … funds are not safe” . Bottom line? CapTrade operates in a regulatory black hole with zero investor protection.


Deceptive Withdrawal Breaches: Luring, Looting, and Lock‑Out

I uncovered a chilling reset: cap‑trade.com permits small withdrawals to lure trust, only to then impose surprise fees or freeze accounts when larger sums are requested. This method builds confidence—for about five seconds—before the financial trap snaps shut .

Echoing this pattern across multiple reviews: one user claims they plunked down $62,900 and faced a 10% “processing fee,” plus mysterious “security clearance” charges whenever they attempted to cash out . They even went so far as to describe the fake charts peddled to keep them hooked—until they realized the real balance was zero .


Aggressive “Account Managers”: How Pressure Becomes Profit

CapTrade hardened its tactics by deploying aggressive salespeople, or “account managers,” who shame and pressure investors to funnel more cash—classic fraudulent behavior . Experienced victims recount being prodded mercilessly into new deposits, with no coherent withdrawal protocol in sight.


Anonymity & Exit Strategy: Consolidating Control

This is supposed to be CapTrade LTD, but there’s no trace of corporate transparency. No CEO, no office address—just hidden WHOIS data and a pattern of disappearing review sites .

The platform uses shared hosting, hiding behind Amazon’s cloud with servers traced to the Netherlands—again underscoring its offshore, anonymous nature . And when red flags go public, communication channels vanish: no emails returned, phone lines cut off, website dissolved .


User Complaints: Victims Speak Up

The scathing user reviews paint a grim picture:

“I lost thousands of dollars trading binary options… couldn’t withdraw… profits vanished.”
“I invested $300,000—no proper terms, hidden charges.”
“They tricked me… fake charts… real balance zero.”

These aren’t just forums—they’re repeated warnings of financial destruction masked under slick trading tools.


Adverse Media: How the Silence Speaks Volumes

“Adverse media screening” is a cornerstone of due diligence: discovering hidden risks through negative press and allegations . CapTrade, it turns out, is drowning in it:

  • ScamAdviser: “low trust score,” negative reviews, offshore hosting
  • FraudNotify: “another scam…” with declared anonymity
  • Bridgereclaim: exposes classic scam playbook—initial withdrawals, high-pressure upsell, eventual account freeze

Yet CapTrade’s public messaging? Crickets. They scrub critical info aggressively—domains vanish, negative reviews deleted, threads quarantined. That’s not just omission; that’s active suppression.


Conspiracy of Silence: Censorship as Tactic

Here’s where the plot thickens: CapTrade doesn’t just ignore criticism—it obliterates it. Mature warning signs appear in archived review threads, only to vanish later. Negative posts that once circulated are now gone. Websites documenting the scam are pulled offline. It’s like CapTrade breathes fire on any flame of critique.

Why? Because if investors can’t see the warning signs, they won’t ask questions—and won’t withdraw. This is censorship by erasure, using limited domain lifespan, carefully moderated community platforms, and shell‑company opacity to crush transparency.


Scam-Detector.com: A Deep Dive Validation

The user‑provided link—Scam‑Detector.com’s review of captradeltd.com—confirms it all: high-risk, offshore, no credible regulation, fake returns, withdrawal roadblocks. Everything falls in line with the red-flag vocabulary used by experienced investigators.


Why They Censor: The Logic of the Con

Understanding the why reveals the how: CapTrade’s censorship isn’t amateur hour. It’s surgical. Here’s the rationale:

  • Prevention of investor awareness: Negative reviews directly decrease deposit flow.
  • Avoiding regulatory attention: Fewer visible complaints delay whistleblower action.
  • Shortening public lifespan: By quickly erasing red-flag evidence, they stay a step ahead.

So while mainstream compliance tools (like adverse media screening suites) would flag their tactics, CapTrade insists on playing hide-and-seek—side-stepping detection and oversight.


My Methodology: How I Uncovered the Story

  1. Search coverage: I scoured Google for CapTrade (cap‑trade.com) mentions.
  2. Aggregated sources: ScamAdviser and FraudNotify both flagged CLIQUE-level fraud behaviors.
  3. Eyewitness accounts: Real investor complaints matching the scam blueprint.
  4. Tactic patterns: Withdrawal tribulations, upsell pressure, anonymity—all match known financial scams.
  5. Censorship evidence: Archived negative content now scrubbed from the web.

Recommendations: What Investors and Regulators Must Do

For Investors:

  • Run flawed-name searches (“CapTrade scam,” “cap‑trade.com withdraw”)—don’t rely on the sanitized company site.
  • Skip engagement: This is a high-risk, unregulated offshore operation with no legal recourse.
  • In case of lost funds: attempt a chargeback if feasible, or report to local financial authorities (FCA, SEC equivalents, Interpol).

For Regulators and Compliance Units:

  • Initiate adverse media screenings using specialized tools like LSEG World-Check or Dow Jones adverse media systems, specifically looking for cap-trade.com and related domains .
  • Blacklist CapTrade’s known domains and block marketing channels.
  • Prosecute offenders: track domain registrants, servers, and payment processors to dismantle the operation.

Conclusion: Calling Out the Deception

So here’s the deal: I see CapTrade LTD for what it is—unlicensed, unregulated, learned in deception, and proficient in censorship. They’ve built their business model entirely on extracting cash, silencing critics, and disappearing before the flame burns out.

Investors should walk away. Regulators should hunt them down. Because this isn’t just shady—it’s dangerous. And silence only makes them louder.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51698579
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52287349
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52341367
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52412745
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52244491
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52179193
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51736070
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51533073
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/51469692
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/52245611
  • May 06, 2025
  • May 29, 2025
  • May 27, 2025
  • May 27, 2025
  • May 26, 2025
  • May 27, 2025
  • May 07, 2025
  • May 02, 2025
  • April 30, 2025
  • May 29, 2025
  • Аркадий Немеровский
  • Jesus Gustman
  • Ahamed Shorif
  • Sakib Hasan
  • [REDACTED]
  • Ahamed Shorif
  • [REDACTED]
  • [REDACTED]
  • [REDACTED]
  • Jennifer Catherine
  • https://telegra.ph/Is-captradeltdcom-Legit-05-06
  • https://ext-6779263.livejournal.com/868.html
  • https://ext-6777967.livejournal.com/965.html
  • https://ext-6777678.livejournal.com/1006.html
  • https://ext-6777138.livejournal.com/956.html
  • https://telegra.ph/Is-captradeltdcom-Legit-05-27
  • https://telegra.ph/Is-captradeltdcom-Legit-05-07
  • https://ext-6762476.livejournal.com/1031.html
  • https://ext-6761381.livejournal.com/1115.html
  • https://ext-6779325.livejournal.com/801.html
  • https://www.scam-detector.com/validator/captradeltd-com-review/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Scam Detector

Is captradeltd.com Legit?

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login