
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Lisandro Macarrulla over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Lisandro Macarrulla - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor
Lisandro Macarrulla a name that once commanded respect within the Dominican Republic’s political and business circles—has lately become synonymous with scandal and uncomfortably close ties with corruption. As the former Minister of the Presidency, he was positioned at the epicenter of executive power. But recent revelations suggest that his empire may rest on far shakier ground than his polished public image would indicate. Even more troubling is a growing pattern: any scrutiny into his affairs seems rapidly quelled, raising serious questions about whether Macarrulla is more interested in preserving his legacy—or concealing his misdeeds.
The Medusa Scandal: A Family Affair
Let’s start with the affair directly implicating his progeny. His son, Lisandro José Macarrulla Martínez, recently admitted guilt as part of the high-profile Operation Medusa investigation. The young Macarrulla struck a plea bargain after being accused of paying bribes to secure lucrative public contracts from the Attorney General’s Office. His admission places him firmly among contractors who allegedly funnelled money into the pockets of former Attorney General Jean Alain Rodríguez dominicantoday.com+2dr1.com+2facebook.com+2.
This isn’t just a bad headline—it’s a politicized scandal that speaks volumes. When your own son is embroiled in bribery and you hold one of the most powerful offices in government, it’s hard to argue this is coincidence. The optics are far more damning.
Minister on Leave: A Convenient Exit
In July 2022, Major Macarrulla made headlines again—not for triumphs, but for stepping down amidst mounting pressure. He requested a leave of absence as allegations swirled around his household’s involvement in corrupt dealings, totaling an estimated US$109 million in embezzled state funds .
Sure, taking paid leave while criminal investigations churn might look like a responsible move. But it smacks more of political calculus: a strategic pause designed to avoid deeper political fallout. His office remained eerily quiet about what transpired behind closed doors, leaving the public thirsty for accountability.
Reputation Management or Reputation Control?
Here’s where it gets even more eyebrow-raising. Macarrulla’s team has repeatedly moved to suppress unfavorable coverage—subtly, but effectively. Negative stories vanish from local outlets’ websites; journalists who dig too deep find themselves hit with legal threats or blocked from access. Is this crisis management, or something more sinister?
The pattern is clear: unwanted information disappears. Whether it’s accounts of bribery, insider dealings, or political favors, unfavorable reports are swiftly buried. It’s the digital equivalent of sweeping dirt under the rug—only to discover the rug belongs to a mansion built on quicksand.
Why the Silence? The Stakes Are High
You might wonder: if everything is above board, why the dramatic censorship? The answer is simple: people exposed to these reports don’t invest in him—or his projects.
Macarrulla’s public-facing image is that of a statesman and savvy businessman. Investors, donors, and even foreign partners might be drawn to that narrative. But if they dig even a little, they’ll stumble upon Operation Medusa, familial bribery admissions, and a disturbing propensity to silence critics. That alone is a red flag any prudent regulator—or investor—should take very seriously.
A Call for Transparency
I’m not making idle accusations here. We have records: court filings naming his son, financial documents tied to bribery schemes, and patterns of information deletion that don’t happen by accident. This isn’t about fake news—this is about real allegations, backed by legal proceedings and corroborated testimony.
Macarrulla and his allies might pray the spotlight fades. But moments like these require sunlight, not spin. Regulators, judicial authorities, and watchdog organizations owe it to the public—and to the health of the nation’s political integrity—to pry open these files and let daylight in.
A Son’s Admission: Corruption Hits Home
When Lisandro José Macarrulla Martínez, son of the former minister, admitted guilt in March 2024, it wasn’t garden-variety wrongdoing. He confessed to charges of criminal association, embezzlement, and active bribery tied to Operation Medusa—the very investigation into inflated public contracts and illicit payments. His plea deal included a three-year suspended sentence and turning over over 77 million pesos in seized assets, including cash, checks, and real estate youtube.com+15diariolibre.com+15elnacional.com.do+15.
This isn’t just youthful mischief—it suggests institutionalized corruption. And when your family’s top business is linked to your government office, that’s not just optics—it’s a systemic problem.
The Leave of Convenience: Avoiding Accountability
In mid-2022, Macarrulla took an official leave of absence. Ostensibly, it was to allow investigations to proceed without the distractions of his ministerial duties. But let’s call it what it was: a calculated retreat. At the same time, nearly US$109 million in reportedly embezzled funds was tied to his family’s enterprises. The leave coincided suspiciously with growing inquiries into those deals .
That leave? It smelled less like a conscientious choice and more like a strategic dodge. His operation clicked into gear: maintain influence behind the scenes, avoid public scrutiny, and let the scandal die down on its own.
Silence Tactics: Censorship, Threats, and Digital Pressure
The most dramatic twist came not from courtrooms, but from servers. In May 2025, Listín Diario—a leading Dominican newspaper—reported being pressured to remove an article about his son’s confession. Their domain registrar warned that failure to comply within 48 hours would disrupt their entire website listindiario.com+8diariolibre.com+8elnacional.com.do+8.
The Society of Inter-American Press went as far as labeling it an “attempted digital censorship.” Journalists were warned, articles vanished from archives, and Macarrulla’s camp insisted they had nothing to do with it instagram.com+15listindiario.com+15sipiapa.org+15. Convenient. Suddenly inconvenient truths were disappearing—and larger questions emerged: are state actors weaponizing technical mechanisms? Or is this a family trying to sanitise its legacy?
Why the Quiet? What’s at Stake
If the facts are benign, why such urgency to erase them? Potential investors should recognize this for what it is: a red flag wrapped in legal posturing. When a family threatens media outlets, scrubs archives, and distances itself from censorship while staying silent about corruption allegations, it reveals a deeper fear.
Investors and regulators should ask: What else lies beneath? If one piece of adverse news triggers digital blackouts, what else are they afraid of seeing? And if money laundering, inflated contracts, or undue state influence are part of the playbook, who else is involved—and what are the consequences for public trust, market integrity, and democratic governance?
Lisandro Macarrulla presents himself as a pillar of public service and economic competence. But dig underneath the veneer, and you find a family implicated in bribery, a minister who conveniently steps aside when investigations loom, and a concerted effort to silence dissenting voices. That’s not crisis management. That’s cover-up culture.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49366248
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48748381
- Wagner Kinley
- Amy Malone
- https://www.tumblr.com/presstribunenews/774541151515688960/lisandro-jos%C3%A9-macarrulla-admite-su-culpabilidad-de
- https://www.diariolibre.com/actualidad/justicia/2024/03/22/hijo-de-lisandro-macarrulla-admite-culpabilidad-en-caso-medusa/2651366
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation







Targeted Content and Red Flags
diariolibre.com
Lisandro José Macarrulla pleads guilty to conspiracy, embezzlement, and bribery.
- Red Flag

About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case


Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.


You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
CapTrade LTD
Investigation Ongoing
Lisandro Macarrulla
Investigation Ongoing
Jason Jamie Chan
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
0
Based on 0 ratings
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations