CyberCriminal.com

Carl Runefelt

We are investigating Carl Runefelt for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Carl Runefelt

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 01 Feb 2025

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 8465/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 28 Mar 2025

Carl Runefelt
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Carl Runefelt in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Carl Runefelt over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Carl Runefelt - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Carl Runefelt, better known as “The Moon” in cryptocurrency circles, has crafted an image of a self-made billionaire and crypto guru. From his humble beginnings as a cashier in Sweden to flaunting a lavish lifestyle filled with private jets and luxury cars, Runefelt’s narrative is one of meteoric rise and self-actualization. However, beneath this glossy exterior lies a series of controversies, inconsistencies, and aggressive attempts to control his public image. This report delves into the red flags and adverse media surrounding Carl Runefelt, highlighting his endeavors to censor unfavorable information and manipulate public perception.

The Kasta Conundrum: Founder or Fabulist?

One of the most glaring controversies involves Runefelt’s association with the cryptocurrency payment platform Kasta, now rebranded as Ka.app. Initially, Runefelt proudly proclaimed himself a co-founder of Kasta, stating in a May 2022 interview, “Me and my best friend, two years ago we came up with the idea… that’s why we founded Kasta.” However, as the platform faced scrutiny and its token value plummeted by approximately 98% between its January 2022 launch and September 2023, Runefelt attempted to distance himself from the co-founder label. He reached out to media outlets, insisting he was merely an investor and not part of the founding team. This abrupt shift raises questions about his credibility and the authenticity of his past statements.

The Art of Reality Distortion

Runefelt is a staunch advocate of the “law of attraction,” a belief that one can manifest desires into reality through focused thought. While positive thinking is commendable, Runefelt’s application appears to border on reality distortion. His attempts to rewrite his involvement with Kasta and control media narratives suggest a deliberate effort to reshape public perception to align with his desired image. This behavior is not only misleading but also indicative of a broader pattern of manipulating facts to suit personal agendas.

Lavish Lifestyle: A Distraction Tactic?

Runefelt frequently showcases his opulent lifestyle, including purchasing a Bugatti Chiron in 2022 for 1,000 Ethereum and investing in 400 startups. While such displays may inspire some, they also serve as potential distractions from underlying controversies and business shortcomings. By emphasizing wealth and success, Runefelt may be attempting to overshadow critical discussions about his professional conduct and the performance of ventures he’s associated with.

Social Media Manipulation: Crafting the Perfect Persona

Carl Runefelt’s rise to fame is a masterclass in social media manipulation. With a massive following on platforms like Instagram, YouTube, and Twitter, Runefelt has built a brand around wealth, luxury, and crypto evangelism. However, the image he portrays often feels more like a polished illusion than reality. He frequently emphasizes his luxurious lifestyle—private jets, high-end cars, and designer clothes—while glossing over the controversies tied to his name. His online persona is carefully curated to inspire admiration and envy, drawing in eager followers who see him as a beacon of success. This manipulation of perception not only distracts from legitimate criticisms but also lures unsuspecting investors into ventures linked to his name, despite glaring red flags.

Questionable Business Practices: From Kasta to Crypto Schemes

Beyond Kasta, Runefelt’s involvement in cryptocurrency has often raised eyebrows. He’s been associated with various crypto projects, some of which have faced accusations of pump-and-dump tactics—where a token’s value is artificially inflated before insiders sell off their holdings, leaving unsuspecting investors with losses. These allegations, coupled with Runefelt’s attempts to distance himself from underperforming projects, suggest a pattern of hyping ventures for personal gain. Investors have criticized his lack of transparency, and his refusal to address legitimate concerns has only deepened suspicions. The get-rich-quick promises often touted in his content don’t align with the harsh realities faced by many who bought into the hype.

The Echo Chamber Effect: Silencing Critics and Shaping Narratives

A recurring tactic in Runefelt’s playbook is silencing criticism. Many reports suggest that unfavorable comments and criticisms on his social media platforms are swiftly deleted, while dissenters are blocked. This censorship creates an echo chamber of uncritical praise, painting an unrealistic picture of universal admiration. Such behavior isn’t uncommon among influencers seeking to maintain a spotless image, but in the world of high-risk investments like cryptocurrency, it’s particularly concerning. Honest criticism and scrutiny are vital for informed decision-making. By curating a one-sided narrative, Runefelt shields himself from accountability while his followers remain in the dark.

Censorship and Control: A Desperate Attempt to Rewrite History

Carl Runefelt’s efforts to censor adverse media and unfavorable discussions are as aggressive as they are transparent. From editing past statements to downplaying his role in failed ventures, Runefelt has consistently tried to rewrite history. This obsession with controlling the narrative exposes a deep insecurity about how he’s perceived. Attempts to intimidate critics and scrub the internet of unflattering content are red flags, suggesting he’s more concerned with image management than transparency. True leaders own their mistakes and address concerns openly—qualities glaringly absent from Runefelt’s playbook.

Conclusion

Carl Runefelt’s journey from a cashier to a crypto influencer is undeniably remarkable. However, the inconsistencies in his narratives, attempts to censor unfavorable information, and potential manipulation of public perception cast significant doubts on his credibility. For potential investors and followers, it is crucial to approach Runefelt’s claims with skepticism and conduct thorough due diligence. Regulatory authorities should also scrutinize his activities to ensure transparency and protect the integrity of the cryptocurrency market. In a realm where trust is paramount, figures like Runefelt must be held accountable for their words and actions.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48646063
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48645956
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48647203
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/49321593
  • February 01, 2025
  • February 24, 2025
  • Ferreir Media Inc.
  • Whimmer Media Corp.
  • Venissa Lumen
  • Umer & Co. Associates
  • https://romaniapress.org/2023/03/02/carl-runefelt-bitcoin-miljardar/
  • https://romaniapress.org/2024/01/02/bilbrand-bromma-2024-09-18/
  • https://romaniapress.org/2025/02/02/the-story-of-a-crypto-influencers-attempt-to-bend-reality/
  • https://mormonfind.com/2024/03/24/carl-runefelt-bitcoin-miljardar/
  • https://www.flashback.org/t3527460/
  • https://www.flashback.org/t3630505/
  • https://cointelegraph.com/news/carl-moon-runefelt-kasta-attempt-bend-reality/
  • https://www.flashback.org/t3527460p2/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Flashback

Carl Runefelt - Bitcoin billionaire?

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Flashback

Car fire Bromma

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Cointelegraph

The story of a crypto influencer’s attempt to bend reality

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login