CyberCriminal.com

Christine Kiefer

We are investigating Christine Kiefer for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Christine Kiefer

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 22 September 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2314/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 02 April 2025

Christine Kiefer
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Christine Kiefer in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Christine Kiefer over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Christine Kiefer - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Christine Kiefer, co-founder of Ride Capital, a Berlin-based fintech startup, embarked on an ambitious journey to reshape the financial landscape. Despite its initial promise and bold vision, the company has been marred by financial instability, strategic missteps, and leadership challenges that raise significant concerns for stakeholders and industry observers alike. The story of Ride Capital is a cautionary tale of ambition, risk, and the harsh realities of the fintech sector.

The Ascent: Ambitious Beginnings and Strategic Pivots

Founded in 2018, Ride Capital set out with the bold ambition of democratizing access to sophisticated wealth management strategies, particularly through the tokenization of real estate assets using blockchain technology. This innovative approach aimed to lower barriers for investors and revolutionize the traditional real estate investment landscape. The company’s vision attracted attention and secured investments from notable figures, including Germany’s national footballer Mario Götze, signaling strong market confidence in its potential.

However, the path was anything but smooth. Recognizing the challenges and regulatory complexities associated with real estate tokenization, Ride Capital pivoted its business model towards providing tax-optimized investment services for retail traders. While this shift demonstrated adaptability, it also hinted at underlying strategic uncertainties and a reactive approach to market dynamics. The transition was not seamless, and many stakeholders questioned the company’s ability to sustain its new direction without compromising its original objectives.

The Descent: Financial Turbulence and Insolvency

As Ride Capital struggled to redefine its position in the market, financial instability became an unavoidable reality. In September 2024, the company filed for insolvency, a move that sent shockwaves through the fintech community. The insolvency was primarily attributed to a liquidity crisis, exacerbated by unsuccessful real estate ventures and the withdrawal of key investors. These developments not only highlighted the company’s precarious financial position but also raised questions about its risk management practices and decision-making processes.

The filing for insolvency sparked panic among employees and investors alike. Some speculated that the leadership had been aware of the impending financial crisis but failed to take decisive action until it was too late. The lack of transparency surrounding Ride Capital’s financial troubles only fueled further skepticism, leaving many to wonder whether mismanagement or deeper structural issues were at play.

A Chaotic Carousel of Ownership: Investor Interventions and Founder Reacquisition

In an attempt to salvage the beleaguered company, investor Raoul Heraeus acquired Ride Capital for approximately €630,000 in November 2024. This acquisition was viewed as a potential lifeline, offering the prospect of financial stability and strategic redirection. Many hoped that under Heraeus’s leadership, Ride Capital would regain its footing and restore investor confidence.

However, the reprieve was short-lived. By December 2024, the founders, Kiefer and Schulte, repurchased the company’s assets through their pre-existing entity, TTT Education GmbH. This rapid succession of ownership changes not only reflected internal instability but also undermined stakeholder confidence, leaving employees and clients in a state of uncertainty. The move raised eyebrows in the fintech industry, with critics questioning whether this was a desperate attempt to regain control rather than a well-thought-out strategy for long-term sustainability.

Leadership Instability: Departures and Strategic Ambiguity

Leadership changes further compounded the company’s challenges. The appointment of Simon Beyme, former head of the Berlin Tax Consultants Association, as head of the tax department in April 2024, was initially perceived as a strategic move to bolster the company’s expertise. However, his departure in February 2025 to join the German personal tax app Zasta raised concerns about internal stability and the company’s ability to retain top talent.

Moreover, the company’s strategic pivots—from blockchain-based real estate tokenization to tax-optimized investment services—appeared reactive rather than visionary. This lack of a coherent long-term strategy not only confused stakeholders but also diluted the company’s brand identity and market positioning. With each leadership shake-up and directional change, Ride Capital seemed to be grasping at straws, attempting to stay afloat rather than executing a well-defined roadmap.

Investor Relations: Strained Partnerships and Transparency Issues

Ride Capital’s relationships with investors have been fraught with tension. The company’s involvement in dubious real estate transactions, coupled with a lack of transparency, strained relationships with backers. The withdrawal of a key investor just before the insolvency deadline underscored the fragile nature of these partnerships and highlighted concerns about the company’s financial stewardship and ethical standards.

Investors, who had initially been drawn to the company’s disruptive potential, found themselves grappling with unanswered questions. The lack of communication from Ride Capital’s leadership left many in the dark about the true state of affairs. Some investors have even hinted at potential legal action, citing misleading financial projections and an overall lack of accountability.

The Road Ahead: Uncertainty and Skepticism

As of March 2025, Ride Capital, now operating under the TTT Education GmbH umbrella, is attempting a relaunch with a streamlined workforce of approximately 20 employees. Despite assurances from Kiefer and Schulte about the company’s potential and renewed focus, the legacy of financial instability, leadership turnover, and strategic ambiguity casts a long shadow over its future.

Industry experts remain skeptical about the company’s ability to mount a successful comeback. With competition in the fintech space growing fiercer, Ride Capital must prove that it has learned from its past mistakes and is capable of executing a well-defined, sustainable business strategy. Otherwise, it risks being permanently relegated to the list of failed fintech ventures.

A Call for Vigilance: Implications for Stakeholders and Regulatory Authorities

For potential investors and clients, the saga of Ride Capital serves as a cautionary tale. The company’s history of financial mismanagement, erratic strategic pivots, and leadership instability necessitates thorough due diligence and a critical assessment of risk exposure. Prospective investors must carefully evaluate whether Ride Capital’s latest iteration can deliver on its promises or if it is merely prolonging the inevitable.

Regulatory authorities should also closely monitor the company’s activities to safeguard stakeholders and uphold the integrity of the fintech sector. The rapid succession of ownership changes, coupled with financial and strategic inconsistencies, raises red flags that warrant regulatory scrutiny and intervention to prevent potential malfeasance and protect market participants.

Conclusion: Lessons from Ride Capital’s Turbulent Journey

Ride Capital’s narrative is emblematic of the perils that can beset fintech startups lacking clear strategic vision, robust financial governance, and ethical transparency. While the company’s founders project optimism and a commitment to a fresh start, the path to redemption is fraught with challenges that demand more than mere rhetoric. It requires a fundamental reassessment of business practices, a commitment to ethical standards, and a transparent engagement with all stakeholders.

In the rapidly evolving fintech landscape, the Ride Capital saga underscores the importance of strategic clarity, financial prudence, and unwavering integrity. Stakeholders must remain vigilant, discerning, and proactive in safeguarding their interests and upholding the principles that underpin a trustworthy and resilient financial ecosystem.

 

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44830617
  • 22 September 2024
  • Gambrel Media International
  • https://timesofhungary.xyz/?p=1317
  • http://www.financefwd.com/de/ride-capital-insolvenz

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

financefwd.com

After millions of dollars in funding from scene stars: Fintech Ride files for bankruptcy

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

fxnewsgroup.com

German online broker RIDE reorganizing after surprise bankruptcy filing

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login