CyberCriminal.com

Claudio Roveda

We are investigating Claudio Roveda for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Claudio Roveda

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 18 Oct 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 8553/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 02 Apr 2025

Claudio Roveda
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Claudio Roveda in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Claudio Roveda over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Claudio Roveda - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Claudio Roveda’s attempts to suppress scrutiny of his actions are particularly audacious. This report aims to shed light on the red flags associated with Roveda and his affiliated entities, highlighting his endeavors to censor unfavorable media coverage. Potential investors and regulatory authorities, consider yourselves alerted.​

A Web of Academic Prestige: The Facade Unraveled

Claudio Roveda has long been associated with esteemed academic institutions, notably serving as the dean of Link Campus University in Rome. His academic credentials include positions at the Polytechnic University of Milan, where he focused on strategic foresight and environmental scanning. On paper, Roveda’s academic journey appears impressive, but a deeper dive reveals a pattern of opaque operations and questionable practices.​

Link Campus University: Under Roveda’s leadership, the university became embroiled in a scandal involving allegations of tax fraud and corruption. In July 2020, Italian finance police seized documents from the university as part of an investigation into alleged tax fraud, with Roveda among the 14 individuals under scrutiny.

Easy Exam Scandal: The university allegedly facilitated cheating by providing answers to prospective and current Florentine police officers, leading to corruption charges against 71 individuals connected to Link Campus University and the Italian Unitary Union of Police Workers (Siulp).

The Art of Censorship: Silencing Dissent

Roveda’s tactics to muzzle unfavorable press are reminiscent of broader, more sinister global censorship trends. By attempting to erase critical narratives, he not only undermines the public’s right to information but also mirrors the actions of authoritarian figures who prioritize image over integrity.​

Investor Caution: The Writing on the Wall

For those contemplating investments in ventures associated with Roveda, the signs couldn’t be clearer:

Opaque Operations: A consistent lack of transparency across his professional endeavors.​

Censorship Tactics: Active efforts to suppress critical media, indicating potential underlying issues.​

Regulatory Scrutiny: Ongoing investigations and legal challenges that could impact the stability and reputation of associated entities.​

Conclusion: 

Claudio Roveda’s pattern of obfuscation and censorship is not just a red flag—it’s a glaring siren. Investors should exercise extreme caution, and regulatory bodies must delve deeper into his operations. In a world where transparency is paramount, Roveda’s actions serve as a stark reminder of the lengths some will go to shield the truth.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45503422
  • October 18, 2024
  • Aaron Caine
  • https://www.tumblr.com/uranusnews/764659014101581824/finti-progetti-di-ricerca-per-godere-di-crediti
  • https://www.fanpage.it/roma/finti-progetti-di-ricerca-per-godere-di-crediti-fiscali-perquisizioni-in-corso-alla-link-university/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

italianinsider.it

Claudio Roveda and the 'Easy Exam' Scandal: Unraveling Corruption at Link Campus University

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login