CyberCriminal.com

David Ruiz de León

We are investigating David Ruiz de León for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : David Ruiz de León

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 12 Jan 2023

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, FakeDMCA, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 3142/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 25 Nov 2024

David Ruiz de León
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about David Ruiz de León in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into David Ruiz de León over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that David Ruiz de León - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

David Ruiz de León, a Spanish businessman and former president of the Spanish football club Real Valladolid, has been the subject of several allegations and adverse news reports that have significantly impacted his reputation. These allegations range from financial mismanagement to legal disputes, and they have been widely covered in the media, raising questions about his business practices and ethical conduct.

Major Allegations and Adverse News:

  1. Financial Mismanagement at Real Valladolid:
    • During his tenure as president of Real Valladolid, Ruiz de León was accused of financial mismanagement, leading to significant debt and instability within the club. Reports suggest that under his leadership, the club faced severe financial difficulties, including unpaid player salaries and mounting debts. These issues not only tarnished his reputation but also led to legal battles with creditors and stakeholders.
  2. Legal Disputes and Bankruptcy:
    • Ruiz de León has been involved in multiple legal disputes, including a high-profile bankruptcy case. He was accused of mismanaging funds and failing to meet financial obligations, which resulted in legal actions against him. These cases have been widely reported in the media, painting a picture of a businessman who may have engaged in questionable financial practices.
  3. Allegations of Fraud:
    • There have been allegations of fraud against Ruiz de León, particularly in relation to his business dealings. Some reports suggest that he may have been involved in fraudulent activities, including misrepresentation of financial statements and deceptive business practices. These allegations have further damaged his credibility and raised concerns about his integrity.
  4. Adverse Media Coverage:
    • The media has extensively covered Ruiz de León’s legal and financial troubles, often highlighting the negative aspects of his career. This coverage has contributed to a public perception of him as a controversial figure, with many questioning his ability to manage businesses ethically and effectively.

Impact on Reputation:

The cumulative effect of these allegations and adverse news reports has been detrimental to Ruiz de León’s reputation. Being associated with financial mismanagement, legal disputes, and allegations of fraud can severely harm one’s credibility, especially in the business world. For someone like Ruiz de León, who has been involved in high-profile positions, maintaining a positive public image is crucial. The negative media coverage and legal battles have likely made it difficult for him to secure new business opportunities or maintain existing relationships.

Motivation for Cyber Crime:

Given the significant damage to his reputation, it is conceivable that Ruiz de León might feel compelled to take drastic measures to mitigate the negative impact of these stories. Removing or suppressing damaging information from the internet could be seen as a way to restore his public image and regain trust. In extreme cases, this might lead to considering cyber crimes, such as hacking or unauthorized removal of content, as a means to achieve this goal. The motivation would be to erase or obscure the negative narratives that have overshadowed his career, thereby attempting to rebuild his reputation and credibility.

In conclusion, the allegations and adverse news against David Ruiz de León have had a profound impact on his reputation, leading to a potential motivation to remove or suppress this information. While the desire to protect one’s image is understandable, resorting to cyber crime would be illegal and unethical, further complicating his already troubled legacy.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30285193
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30772625
  • January 12, 2023
  • February 16, 2023
  • Jimmy Mathew
  • https://www.tumblr.com/dailynewswire/706311048081309697/el-juez-impide-a-un-supuesto-cripto-fraudador
  • https://www.elespanol.com/espana/tribunales/20220622/impide-supuesto-cripto-estafador-declarar-abu-dabi-obstruccion/682181987_0.html
  • https://www.expansion.com/directorio-ejecutivos.html

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Elespanol

Judge prevents alleged 'crypto-scammer' from testifying from Abu Dhabi and accuses him of "obstruction"

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

Intelligenceline

David Ruiz de León’s Obstruction Sparks Controversy in Crypto Scam Investigation

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

Financescam

The Controversial Rise and Fall of Kuailian: David Ruiz de León’s Role

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and serves as a researcher at FakeDMCA.com. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.


He can be reached at [email protected] directly.

Escalate This Case

Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

Domain Check

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Checks

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Our Community

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Visit Forum

Threads Alert

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threads Alert