CyberCriminal.com

Dr. Constantino Mendieta

We are investigating Dr. Constantino Mendieta for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Dr. Constantino Mendieta

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 02 Oct 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 7847/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 27 Mar 2025

Dr. Constantino Mendieta
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Dr. Constantino Mendieta in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Dr. Constantino Mendieta over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Dr. Constantino Mendieta - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Dr. Constantino Mendieta presents a textbook case of why due diligence is essential before entrusting a surgeon—or investing in their practice. With a troubling history of patient complaints, legal entanglements, and attempts to suppress negative publicity, Mendieta has built a reputation that raises more red flags than a bullfighting arena. From botched surgeries and post-operative neglect to lawsuits and questionable online reputation management, the evidence suggests a pattern of misconduct that warrants serious scrutiny. Below, we dive into the key concerns surrounding Dr. Mendieta and why authorities and investors alike should take notice.

Patient Complaints and Adverse Outcomes

Dr. Mendieta’s practice has been marred by numerous patient grievances, many of which detail severe complications and questionable post-operative care. One patient recounted a harrowing experience, stating, “I had surgery mid last year and I regret every day that I met this man. I have been in deep depression since my surgery because of how badly he messed up my body.” She further alleged unauthorized procedures and uneven results, leading to significant emotional distress.

Another patient echoed similar sentiments, expressing frustration over post-operative complications and lack of follow-up care. She reported a serious infection that was dismissed by the staff, stating, “I had a serious infection and they didn’t care at all.” This neglect forced her to seek treatment elsewhere, highlighting a disturbing pattern of patient abandonment.

Furthermore, a patient who underwent a tummy tuck described prolonged suffering due to post-operative complications, including a persistent abdominal wound and a six-month-long staph infection. She lamented, “I had a hole the size of half dollar in my abdomen for 6 months, staff infection for 6 months and never saw him once after the surgery.” Such accounts raise serious questions about the standard of care provided.

Legal Entanglements and Professional Scrutiny

Dr. Mendieta’s professional journey is punctuated by legal disputes and professional scrutiny. In June 2012, he faced a lawsuit after allegedly leaving a medical implement in a patient’s breast post-surgery. The case was settled out of court, leaving lingering doubts about his surgical practices.

More alarmingly, in October 2013, radio DJ Betty Pino died following reconstructive surgery performed by Dr. Mendieta to remove hardened silicone implants. The Miami-Dade County medical examiner’s report attributed her death to infections stemming from the surgery, leading to sepsis and subsequent complications. Dr. Mendieta disputed these findings, citing “much misinformation in the report,” but the incident casts a long shadow over his medical competence.

In 2020, fitness influencer Jenelle Butler sued Dr. Mendieta and the producers of the television show “The Doctors” after a botched gluteal implant removal left her disfigured. Butler alleged that Dr. Mendieta failed to perform critical pre-surgical assessments and that the surgery resulted in extensive tissue death, severe scarring, and profound emotional distress. She claimed that the ordeal led her to contemplate suicide, underscoring the devastating impact of the alleged malpractice.

Attempts to Suppress Negative Publicity

In the face of mounting criticism, Dr. Mendieta appears to have adopted strategies aimed at silencing dissent and controlling the narrative surrounding his practice. Patients have reported difficulties in sharing their negative experiences, with some alleging that their reviews and testimonials have been met with legal threats or removal requests. This pattern suggests an orchestrated effort to suppress adverse media and maintain a facade of competence.

For instance, despite numerous negative reviews detailing severe complications and poor post-operative care, Dr. Mendieta’s profile on Healthgrades boasts a 4.7 out of 5 rating based on 250 reviews. This discrepancy raises questions about the authenticity of the positive reviews and whether negative feedback is being systematically filtered out.

A Call to Action for Investors and Authorities

The accumulation of patient complaints, legal disputes, and attempts to censor criticism paints a troubling picture of Dr. Mendieta’s practice. Potential investors should exercise extreme caution, as association with such a contentious figure could pose significant reputational and financial risks. The pattern of adverse outcomes and alleged misconduct suggests a volatile investment landscape fraught with potential liabilities.

Regulatory authorities must also take heed. The repeated instances of patient harm and the surgeon’s apparent disregard for ethical standards warrant thorough investigation. Ensuring patient safety and upholding the integrity of the medical profession necessitate holding practitioners like Dr. Mendieta accountable for their actions.

Conclusion

Dr. Constantino Mendieta’s career serves as a cautionary tale of what can transpire when patient welfare is overshadowed by personal gain and reputation management. The numerous red flags—from grievous patient experiences to legal battles and censorship efforts—demand vigilant scrutiny. It is incumbent upon both investors and regulatory bodies to take decisive action, ensuring that the principles of medical ethics and patient care are not compromised by those who prioritize self-interest over the well-being of those they vow to heal.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45129224
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/45171761
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44599805
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44556967
  • October 02, 2024
  •  
  • September 12, 2024
  • September 12, 2024
  • Jon Wilson
  • Aaron Caine
  • Katie Rosen
  • Aaron Caine
  • https://www.tumblr.com/vivonews/761395135726632960/doctor-defends-himself-in-death-of-miami-dj-betty
  • https://www.latintimes.com/betty-pino-autopsy-results-famous-radio-personality-died-complications-after-butt-surgery-131917
  • https://www.tumblr.com/themarblesnews/761396628445855744/dj-betty-pino-isnt-first-to-accuse-plastic
  • https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/doctor-defends-himself-in-death-of-miami-dj-betty-pino/1931770/
  • https://www.miaminewtimes.com/news/dj-betty-pino-isnt-first-to-accuse-plastic-surgeon-of-malpractice-6393725
  • https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article1956258.html
  • https://web.archive.org/web/20240914164353/https://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/doctor-defends-himself-in-death-of-miami-dj-betty-pino/1931770/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

nbcmiami.com

Doctor Defends Himself in Death of Miami DJ Betty Pino

  • Removed
Visit Link

podhurst

‘The Doctors’ Producer Must Face Botched Surgery Suit In Fla

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

hollywoodreporter

‘The Doctors’ Producers Sued Over Botched Implant Removal

  • Removed
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login