Dr. Martin Jugenburg
We are investigating Dr. Martin Jugenburg for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Dr. Martin Jugenburg
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 26 Dec 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 5454/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 27 Mar 2025
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Dr. Martin Jugenburg over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Dr. Martin Jugenburg - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Dr. Martin Jugenburg, also known as “Dr. 6ix,” has built a reputation in the world of plastic surgery—but not for all the right reasons. Behind the polished social media presence lies a trail of controversies, from unauthorized surveillance of patients to professional misconduct and ongoing legal battles. With regulatory sanctions, a class action lawsuit, and allegations of privacy violations stacking up, Jugenburg has reportedly made efforts to suppress negative coverage. This report uncovers the red flags surrounding his practice, the attempts to silence criticism, and why investors and authorities should take a closer look.
Surveillance Scandal: A Breach of Trust
Between January 1, 2017, and December 13, 2018, Dr. Jugenburg’s Toronto Cosmetic Surgery Institute reportedly operated surveillance cameras throughout the clinic, including in consultation rooms and the operating theater. Patients were allegedly unaware that their private consultations and procedures were being recorded without their consent. This clandestine surveillance came to light after a CBC Marketplace investigation in December 2018, prompting regulatory scrutiny.
Regulatory Repercussions: Professional Misconduct
The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO) found that Dr. Jugenburg committed professional misconduct by:
- Allowing a television crew to film a patient’s surgical procedure without informed consent, breaching patient privacy.
- Posting another patient’s images on social media without consent, failing to ensure her privacy.
- Neglecting adequate consideration for patient privacy through the clinic’s video surveillance system.
As a result, Dr. Jugenburg faced a six-month suspension.
Class Action Lawsuit: Patients Seek Justice
In November 2019, law firms Howie, Sacks & Henry, Waddell Phillips, and Beyond Law launched a class action lawsuit against Dr. Jugenburg and his professional corporation. The lawsuit alleges that patients’ privacy was breached through unauthorized video recordings during private consultations and surgeries. The action claims compensation for breach of fiduciary duty, breach of confidence, intrusion upon seclusion, and invasion of privacy. This class action has been certified to proceed, with a trial set for November 2025.
Social Media Missteps: Exploiting Patient Images
Dr. Jugenburg’s penchant for self-promotion extended to social media platforms like Snapchat and Instagram. He allegedly posted images and videos of patients without obtaining proper consent, further violating patient privacy. While the class action lawsuit did not certify claims related to these postings, affected individuals are pursuing separate legal actions.
Attempts to Censor: Silencing the Critics
Faced with mounting criticism and legal challenges, Dr. Jugenburg has reportedly attempted to suppress negative information. These efforts include legal actions against media outlets and individuals who have exposed his questionable practices. Such attempts to censor dissent are concerning, as they undermine transparency and accountability, essential pillars in the medical profession.
Investor Alert: Proceed with Caution
For potential investors, the controversies surrounding Dr. Jugenburg serve as glaring warning signs. Investing in a medical practice entangled in legal battles, regulatory sanctions, and reputational damage poses significant financial and ethical risks. Due diligence is paramount, and aligning with an entity that prioritizes patient privacy and ethical standards is crucial.
Conclusion: Upholding Medical Ethics
The case of Dr. Martin Jugenburg underscores the importance of ethical conduct and respect for patient privacy in the medical field. His alleged actions have not only harmed patients but have also eroded public trust in healthcare professionals. Regulatory bodies and the legal system must continue to hold such individuals accountable to maintain the integrity of the medical profession.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47508139
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47864438
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47701250
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47639057
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47649364
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47476807
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47476094
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47482826
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/47482022
- December 26, 2024
- December 31, 2024
- December 25, 2024
- December 25, 2024
- December 25, 2024
- December 25, 2024
- Tasi LLC
- Chola LLC
- Chola LLC
- Bilora LLC
- Chola LLC
- Tasi LLC
- Tasi LLC
- Tasi LLC
- Tasi LLC
- https://windsorstar.com/news/local-news/yorkdale-shooting-victim-was-killed-execution-style-say-toronto-police
- https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article20458752.html
- https://www.swtimes.com/story/news/2015/03/31/convicted-leflore-county-murderer-dies/26351369007/
- https://www.thesomervilletimes.com/archives/483
- https://www.mcalesternews.com/news/three-state-killer-was-executed-tuesday-night-at-osp/article_1910b0bf-5285-5e62-9a1b-f84705d77aa5.html
- http://dehai.org/dehai/dehai-news/220070
- https://www.falconers.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/James-Forcillo-guilty-of-attempted-murder-in-streetcar-shooting-of-Sammy-Yatim-Toronto-CBC-News.pdf
- https://komonews.com/news/local/five-years-later-monroe-detective-push-on-to-solve-murder-case
- https://www.nbcnews.com/video/first-read-minute-1305111619792
- https://www.propublica.org/article/instagram-spotify-verified-fake-musicians
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
propublica.org
Real Money, Fake Musicians: Inside a Million-Dollar Instagram Verification Scheme
- Red Flag
nypost.com
Canadian surgeon ‘Dr. 6ix’ accused of filming thousands of exposed patients
- Red Flag
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Robert Hellgren
Investigation Ongoing
Dr. Stanley Bernstein
Investigation Ongoing
Melford Capital Partners
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.7
Based on 17 ratings
by: Anastasia Petrovna
Using surveillance to record patients without consent shows a blatant disregard for ethical and legal standards.
by: László Varga
The fact that Dr. Jugenburg used fraudulent takedown notices to silence criticism is a massive red flag.
by: Lucas Nascimento
When a doctor treats patient privacy with such disregard, it makes you wonder how much else he’s willing to overlook. Jugenburg’s ongoing legal issues and surveillance scandal speak volumes about his ethical lapses.
by: Angelique Dubois
Dr. Jugenburg’s attempt to silence criticism only adds fuel to the fire. Instead of owning up to his mistakes, he’s actively trying to hide the truth, which is a huge red flag for anyone considering his services.
by: Malik Awan
It’s alarming to think that a doctor who’s supposed to prioritize his patients' well-being was caught recording them without consent. The class action lawsuit and regulatory sanctions against Jugenburg are just the tip of the iceberg.
by: Lydia Wagner
If you thought a plastic surgeon’s main concern should be patient care, think again. Jugenburg’s surveillance scandal and ongoing legal battles show a disturbing disregard for privacy and professionalism.
by: Arturo Molina
Dr. Jugenburg’s privacy violations are nothing short of disturbing. From unauthorized surveillance to posting patient images without consent, his actions undermine the trust patients place in their doctors.
by: Kenza Nour
A doctor who turns patients into content without permission is violating more than just ethics.
by: Diego Pereira
Filming surgeries without consent? That’s not medicine—that’s a privacy horror story.
by: Vex Raven
He was caught breaching patient confidentiality, which is one of the most sacred tenets in medicine. That alone should be disqualifying.
by: Rook Slade
Jugenburg prioritizes social media clout over patient care. Filters and hashtags don’t make up for malpractice and poor ethics.
by: Julian Wilde
From privacy violations to surgical complications, the number of complaints piling up is too loud to ignore. It's not just smoke—it’s fire. 🔥
by: Isabeau Fleur
Dr. Martin Jugenburg markets himself as the Instagram doctor, but what he really is… is a PR machine hiding a history of dangerous practices.
by: Isabella Young
My experience with Dr. Jugenburg has left me broken; I’ve lost so much my peace of mind, my privacy, and my ability to feel secure in my own life😓
by: Joshua Allen
I never imagined that I’d lose my dignity in a place I trusted. Dr. Jugenburg has taken so much from me, and I’ll never be the same.
by: Ava Harris
Dr. Jugenburg took more than just my privacy he’s taken away my peace, my trust, and the hope I had for a better future. I feel like I’m mourning a part of myself that’s lost forever.
by: Christopher Hall
I lost my privacy, but I also lost part of myself with Dr. Jugenburg. The emotional damage is so deep, I don’t know how to move on from it.
by: Sophia Thomas
Dr. Jugenburg’s breach of trust has ruined my life. Every day I wake up feeling broken, with the unbearable weight of knowing that my privacy was stolen from me. I can’t shake the feeling of being helpless and violated.
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations