CyberCriminal.com

Entrust Capital

We are investigating Entrust Capital for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Entrust Capital

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 28 Aug 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 9263/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 18 Mar 2025

Entrust Capital
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Entrust Capital in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Entrust Capital over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Entrust Capital - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Entrust Capital stands out as a particularly egregious example of financial chicanery and desperate attempts at censorship. This report delves into the red flags surrounding Entrust Capital Limited and its affiliated entities, shedding light on their dubious practices and the lengths they’ve gone to suppress the truth.

A Facade of Legitimacy
At first glance, Entrust Capital presents itself as a reputable financial services provider, complete with a polished website and claims of industry expertise. However, a closer examination reveals a house of cards built on deceit. According to a detailed review by Fincapital Reviews, Entrust Capital is nothing more than a fraudulent entity employing fake information to dupe unsuspecting investors. The review highlights that all facts about the company are fabricated, its actual operating period is suspiciously short, and there is a conspicuous absence of genuine reviews online. The company’s activities are unequivocally illegal and fraudulent, serving as a stark warning to potential investors.

The Modus Operandi: Deception and Exploitation
Entrust Capital  strategy is alarmingly simple yet disturbingly effective. By masquerading as a legitimate financial institution, it lures individuals with the promise of lucrative returns on investments. The low initial deposit requirement is a calculated move to attract a broader audience, particularly those who may not have substantial funds but are eager to grow their wealth. Once these unsuspecting investors are onboard, the company employs various tactics to extract as much money as possible before disappearing into the shadows, leaving victims with empty pockets and shattered trust.

Red Flags Waving Unheeded

Several warning signs should have alerted investors to the dubious nature of Entrust Capital:

Fabricated Credentials: The company’s claims of licenses and long-standing operations are entirely fictitious. A thorough verification reveals no legitimate records or registrations, indicating a complete lack of regulatory oversight.

Lack of Transparency: The absence of verifiable information about the company’s leadership, physical office locations, and contact details is a significant red flag. Legitimate financial institutions maintain transparency to build trust with clients.

Scarcity of Authentic Reviews: The internet is devoid of genuine testimonials or reviews from actual clients. This lack of credible feedback suggests that the company’s operations are either minimal or entirely fabricated.

Unrealistic Promises: The allure of high returns with minimal risk is a classic tactic employed by fraudulent schemes. Entrust Capital  promises fall squarely into this category, preying on the greed and naivety of potential investors.

Censorship: The Last Refuge of Scoundrels
When cornered, fraudsters often resort to intimidation and censorship to silence critics and prevent the dissemination of damning information. Entrust Capital  is no exception. The company has attempted to suppress negative reviews and critical analyses through legal threats and other coercive measures. This behavior is reminiscent of tactics employed by other dubious entities that seek to muzzle dissent and maintain their facade of legitimacy.

The Broader Context: A Pattern of Abuse
Entrust Capital actions are part of a larger pattern observed in the financial industry, where unscrupulous entities exploit regulatory loopholes and employ heavy-handed tactics to silence critics. For instance, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has raised concerns about unauthorized entities collecting money from the public under the guise of providing Portfolio Management Services. These entities lure investors with promises of high returns, often using pamphlets and social media platforms to advertise their fraudulent schemes. SEBI has cautioned investors to deal only with registered intermediaries and to be wary of unsolicited investment advice.

The Role of Regulatory Bodies

Regulatory bodies like SEBI play a crucial role in safeguarding investors from fraudulent schemes. By enforcing stringent regulations and conducting regular audits, they aim to maintain the integrity of the financial markets. However, the proliferation of unauthorized advisers and fraudulent entities highlights the challenges regulators face in monitoring and controlling such activities. SEBI has taken action against several entities providing investment advice without proper registration, emphasizing the need for investors to verify the credentials of advisers before engaging their services.

Conclusion: Shining a Light on the Shadows
Entrust Capital fraudulent activities and attempts at censorship are emblematic of a broader issue plaguing the financial industry. While regulatory bodies strive to protect investors, the onus also falls on individuals to remain vigilant and informed. By exposing these deceitful practices and advocating for transparency, we can collectively work towards a more secure and trustworthy financial environment.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43256201
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44156254
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44157311
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44185972
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44209567
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44213703
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46896179
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46896768
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46896443
  • Aug 28, 2024
  • Aug 28, 2024
  • Aug 29, 2024
  • Sep 30, 2023
  • Aug 30, 2024
  • Jul 23, 2024
  • Dec 4, 2024
  • Dec 4, 2024
  • Dec 4, 2024
  • Niquita Monge
  • Adayel Garadys
  • Bohuslav Garadaz
  • Natalio Ellison
  • Tovia Chwindley
  • Owen Hampton
  • Primrose Morrison
  • Primrose Morrison
  • Primrose Morrison
  • https://telegra.ph/Avis-entrustcapitalltdcom-07-23-6
  • https://telegra.ph/Avis-entrustcapitalltdcom-08-28-6
  • https://telegra.ph/Avis-entrustcapitalltdcom-08-30
  • https://ext-6615926.livejournal.com/936.html
  • https://ext-6617350.livejournal.com/956.html
  • https://penzu.com/p/7e2251840fb16364
  • https://telegra.ph/Kak-vernut-dengi-ot-brokera-Entrust-Capital-Limited-12-04-3
  • https://telegra.ph/Obzor-brokerskoj-kompanii-Entrust-Capital-Limited-ocenka-terminala-Trade-EntrustCapitalLimited-com-otzyvy-ob-EHntrast-Kehpital-L-12-04-3
  • https://telegra.ph/Avoid-Entrust-Capital-Ltd-12-04-3
  • https://www.scamadviser.com/check-website/entrustcapitalltd.com
  • https://www.scamadviser.com/fr/verifier-site/entrustcapitalltd.com
  • https://softlanding.ru/scammers/77ac8341864f346d3fe23f2d7e43a972
  • https://backfund.net/chargeback/broker/entrust-capital-limited
  • https://torforex.com/rejting-brokerov/entrust-capital-limited-otzyvy/
  • https://m.facebook.com/story.php/?story_fbid=982631800539917&id=100063793195220

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

capitalforexmarkets.com

Entrust Capital is a Legit or Scam?

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

glassdoor.co.in

Entrust Capita Review Check

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

trustpilot.com

Entrust Capital with Heavy negative reviews

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login