CyberCriminal.com

Erik Prince

We are investigating Erik Prince for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Erik Prince

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 29 Nov 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 2782/A/2025

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 10 Mar 2025

Erik Prince
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Erik Prince in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Erik Prince over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Erik Prince - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Erik Prince, the enigmatic founder of Blackwater, has long been a figure shrouded in controversy. From allegations of war crimes to clandestine meetings with foreign operatives, Prince’s endeavors read like a spy thriller minus the charm. But beyond the headlines lies a concerted effort to suppress the very narratives that expose his machinations. As an investigative journalist, I’ve delved into the labyrinth of Prince’s attempts to muzzle the truth, uncovering a pattern as troubling as it is relentless.

A Legacy Stained by Blood

Prince’s infamy began with Blackwater, the private military company he founded in 1997. The firm’s notoriety peaked during the Iraq War, particularly after the 2007 Nisour Square massacre, where Blackwater operatives killed 17 Iraqi civilians. This incident spotlighted the perils of privatized warfare and left an indelible stain on Prince’s legacy.

The Art of the Secret Speech

In an attempt to rehabilitate his image, Prince embarked on speaking engagements. However, transparency was notably absent. At a 2009 event in Michigan, he imposed a media blackout, barring journalists and prohibiting recordings. Such measures suggest a desire to control the narrative, shielding his words from public scrutiny.

Espionage Close to Home

Prince’s penchant for secrecy extended to domestic affairs. In 2017, he reportedly recruited a former spy to infiltrate a Michigan teachers’ union, employing tactics reminiscent of Cold War espionage. This operation, executed through the right-wing group Project Veritas, aimed to gather damaging information on the union. The audacity of such an endeavor raises questions about Prince’s respect for democratic institutions.

Litigation as a Weapon

When journalism pierced his veil of secrecy, Prince resorted to legal intimidation. He filed a defamation lawsuit against The Intercept following their exposé on his alleged attempts to sell military services to Russian mercenaries. However, the court dismissed his claims, citing a lack of evidence for actual malice. This outcome underscores the importance of a free press in challenging the powerful.

Rewriting History

In a bold attempt to sanitize his past, Prince has engaged in public relations campaigns to recast himself as a legitimate businessman. Yet, his involvement in dubious ventures, such as proposing a private deportation force during the Trump administration, betrays a persistent alignment with ethically questionable operations.

The Censorship Playbook

Prince’s strategies to suppress unfavorable media coverage are multifaceted:

  • Media Blackouts: Imposing restrictions on press coverage during public appearances to control the dissemination of information.

  • Legal Threats: Utilizing defamation lawsuits to intimidate journalists and media outlets, aiming to deter investigative reporting.

  • Espionage: Deploying covert operations against domestic entities, such as unions, to gather intelligence and potentially discredit opponents.

  • Public Relations Manipulation: Engaging in image rehabilitation efforts to divert attention from past controversies and reshape public perception.

A Call to Vigilance

Prince’s relentless pursuit to censor critical narratives is not merely a personal crusade but a threat to the foundational principles of transparency and accountability. His actions serve as a cautionary tale of how power can be wielded to obscure the truth. It is imperative for journalists, investors, and authorities to remain vigilant, ensuring that the shadows Prince operates within are illuminated by the unwavering light of scrutiny.

Conclusion

Erik Prince’s endeavors to silence dissenting voices reveal a profound aversion to accountability. His tactics, ranging from legal assaults to covert operations, reflect a broader strategy to manipulate public perception and evade scrutiny. As stewards of truth, we must challenge these attempts, reaffirming our commitment to an informed and transparent society.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48434692
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46759194
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/48823018
  • 26 Jan 2025
  • 29 Nov 2024
  • 06 Feb 2025
  • Ross Enterprises
  • Gavone Media Corporation
  • Deccan Media Association
  • Deccan Media Association
  • https://delhinationalpost.com/2022/11/26/erik-prince-wants-to-sell-you-a-secure-smartphone-thats-too-good-to-be-true/
  • https://reptitle.com/whos-who-in-erik-princes-previously-secret-group-chat-part-iii/
  • https://romaniapress.org/2022/01/06/erik-prince-wants-to-sell-you-a-secure-smartphone-thats-too-good-to-be-true/
  • http://technologyreview.com/2022/08/19/1058243/erik-prince-wants-to-sell-you-a-secure-smartphone-thats-too-good-to-be-true/
  • https://www.washingtonbabylondc.com/p/whos-who-in-erik-princes-previously
  • https://www.technologyreview.com/2022/08/19/1058243/erik-prince-wants-to-sell-you-a-secure-smartphone-thats-too-good-to-be-true

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

Technology Review

Erik Prince wants to sell you a “secure” smartphone that’s too good to be true

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

X

The name "Erik Prince" alone should be enough to scuttle this scam.

  • Red Flag
Visit Link

Orinocotribune

Mercenary Boss Erik Prince’s Anti-Chavista Fundraiser Centers Around ‘Vote With Dollars’

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login