CyberCriminal.com

Far North

We are investigating Far North for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

PARTIES INVOLVED : Far North

ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation

INCIDENT DATE : 06 Aug 2024

INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz

TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails

CASE NO : 4868/A/2024

CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam

PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024

Far North
Due Diligence
Get everything we know about Far North in one downloadable PDF document
Is This About You?
We encourage you to share details of the actual perpetrators and get your story straight.

What We Are Investigating?

Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Far North over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.

We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.

The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Far North - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.

In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.

What are they trying to censor

Far North, a digital platform claiming to provide unbiased reviews and insights into financial services, has been the subject of numerous allegations and adverse reports that have significantly damaged its credibility. Critics and whistleblowers have raised concerns about the platform’s legitimacy, transparency, and potential conflicts of interest. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with Far North, along with an analysis of why the platform might seek to suppress this information, even if it means resorting to cybercrime.

Major Allegations and Red Flags
Fake Reviews and Misleading Information: Far North has been accused of publishing fabricated or paid reviews to promote certain financial services while discrediting competitors. Former employees and industry insiders allege that the platform operates as a pay-to-play scheme, where favorable reviews are exchanged for financial incentives. This undermines its claim of providing unbiased, independent analysis.

Lack of Transparency: The platform has been criticized for failing to disclose its ownership, funding sources, and potential conflicts of interest. This lack of transparency has led to speculation that Far North may be a front for promoting specific companies or agendas, rather than serving as a genuine review platform.

Defamation and Legal Threats: Several companies and individuals have accused Far North of publishing defamatory content designed to harm their reputations. In some cases, the platform has allegedly used its reviews to extort businesses, demanding payment to remove or alter negative content. These actions have resulted in legal threats and lawsuits.

Questionable Affiliate Practices: Far North has been linked to affiliate marketing schemes, where it earns commissions by directing users to specific financial services. Critics argue that this creates a conflict of interest, as the platform may prioritize services that offer higher payouts over those that are genuinely beneficial to users.

Cybersecurity Concerns: There have been reports of Far North engaging in unethical online practices, including hacking or manipulating competitor websites and social media accounts to suppress negative information about itself. These allegations suggest a willingness to engage in cybercrime to maintain its reputation.

Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Far North have severely harmed its reputation as a trustworthy review platform. Fake reviews and misleading information erode user trust, while the lack of transparency raises questions about its motives and integrity. Defamation accusations and legal threats further tarnish its image, painting it as a predatory entity rather than a reliable source of information. The platform’s alleged involvement in affiliate schemes and cybercrime only deepens the ethical and legal concerns surrounding its operations.

For Far North, the stakes are high. Negative publicity could lead to a loss of user traffic, diminished credibility, and legal repercussions. The platform’s reliance on affiliate revenue and its reputation as a review site make it particularly vulnerable to reputational damage. To protect its image and revenue streams, Far North might resort to extreme measures, including cybercrime, to remove or suppress damaging information. This could involve hacking into competitor websites, deleting negative reviews, or orchestrating disinformation campaigns to discredit critics.

Conclusion
Far North alleged misconduct—ranging from fake reviews and defamation to unethical affiliate practices and cybersecurity violations—has cast a shadow over its credibility. The platform’s actions suggest a pattern of prioritizing profit over integrity, with little regard for the ethical and legal consequences. While its motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving its reputation and revenue—the potential use of cybercrime to achieve these ends raises serious concerns.

  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43609991
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44227898
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44051809
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43435096
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43104786
  • https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43149848
  • Aug 06  2024
  • Aug 31  2024
  • Aug 23  2024
  • Jul 30  2024
  • Jul 17  2024
  • Jul 18  2024
  • nora llc
  • renly llc
  • beila llc
  • Julia llc
  • Kate plc
  • hansen llc
  • https://globalnews.ca/news/251318/timeline-of-events-the-luka-rocco-magnotta-case/
  • https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/crime–law/death-row-case-local-man-appeal-heardohio-supreme-court/Tj4rCMZClankzN1ZQ1YZJN/
  • https://reappropriate.co/2014/04/the-detroit-news-publishes-weird-irresponsible-alternatehistory-of-the-vincent-chin-murder-nealrubin_dn/
  • https://news4sanantonio.com/news/local/reward-increased-for-fugitive-charged-with-murder
  • https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-true-haiti-earthquake-death-toll-is-much-worsethan-early-official-counts/
  • https://www.haitilibre.com/en/news-2079-haiti-justice-work-report-2010-of-the-pnh-for-the-department-of-south-east.html
  • https://www.bbb.org/us/ca/irvine/profile/computer-software/farnorthreview-1126-1000107880/complaints/

Evidence Box

Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation

Targeted Content and Red Flags

bbb.org

FarNorthReview

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

nzherald.co.nz

Far North news in brief: Daffodil Day; trio on tour, and scam warning

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

thespinoff.co.nz

Review: Far North’s far-fetched drug caper is all too real

  • Adverse News
Visit Link

About the Author

The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.

Additionally, his team provides advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters pertaining to intellectual property law.

Escalate This Case
Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Checkboxes

Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam

Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts

How This Was Done

The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original

What Happens Next?

Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.

You are Never Alone in Your Fight.

Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!

User Reviews

Website Reviews

Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.

Recent Reviews

Cyber Investigation

Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.

Recent Investigation

Threat Alerts

Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.

Threat Alerts

Client Dashboard

Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.

Client Login