Far North
We are investigating Far North for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Far North
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 06 Aug 2024
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 4868/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 21 Nov 2024
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Far North over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Far North - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Far North, a digital platform claiming to provide unbiased reviews and insights into financial services, has been the subject of numerous allegations and adverse reports that have significantly damaged its credibility. Critics and whistleblowers have raised concerns about the platform’s legitimacy, transparency, and potential conflicts of interest. Below is a summary of the major allegations, red flags, and adverse news associated with Far North, along with an analysis of why the platform might seek to suppress this information, even if it means resorting to cybercrime.
Major Allegations and Red Flags
Fake Reviews and Misleading Information: Far North has been accused of publishing fabricated or paid reviews to promote certain financial services while discrediting competitors. Former employees and industry insiders allege that the platform operates as a pay-to-play scheme, where favorable reviews are exchanged for financial incentives. This undermines its claim of providing unbiased, independent analysis.
Lack of Transparency: The platform has been criticized for failing to disclose its ownership, funding sources, and potential conflicts of interest. This lack of transparency has led to speculation that Far North may be a front for promoting specific companies or agendas, rather than serving as a genuine review platform.
Defamation and Legal Threats: Several companies and individuals have accused Far North of publishing defamatory content designed to harm their reputations. In some cases, the platform has allegedly used its reviews to extort businesses, demanding payment to remove or alter negative content. These actions have resulted in legal threats and lawsuits.
Questionable Affiliate Practices: Far North has been linked to affiliate marketing schemes, where it earns commissions by directing users to specific financial services. Critics argue that this creates a conflict of interest, as the platform may prioritize services that offer higher payouts over those that are genuinely beneficial to users.
Cybersecurity Concerns: There have been reports of Far North engaging in unethical online practices, including hacking or manipulating competitor websites and social media accounts to suppress negative information about itself. These allegations suggest a willingness to engage in cybercrime to maintain its reputation.
Reputation Damage and Motives for Suppression
The allegations against Far North have severely harmed its reputation as a trustworthy review platform. Fake reviews and misleading information erode user trust, while the lack of transparency raises questions about its motives and integrity. Defamation accusations and legal threats further tarnish its image, painting it as a predatory entity rather than a reliable source of information. The platform’s alleged involvement in affiliate schemes and cybercrime only deepens the ethical and legal concerns surrounding its operations.
For Far North, the stakes are high. Negative publicity could lead to a loss of user traffic, diminished credibility, and legal repercussions. The platform’s reliance on affiliate revenue and its reputation as a review site make it particularly vulnerable to reputational damage. To protect its image and revenue streams, Far North might resort to extreme measures, including cybercrime, to remove or suppress damaging information. This could involve hacking into competitor websites, deleting negative reviews, or orchestrating disinformation campaigns to discredit critics.
Conclusion
Far North alleged misconduct—ranging from fake reviews and defamation to unethical affiliate practices and cybersecurity violations—has cast a shadow over its credibility. The platform’s actions suggest a pattern of prioritizing profit over integrity, with little regard for the ethical and legal consequences. While its motivations for suppressing negative information are clear—preserving its reputation and revenue—the potential use of cybercrime to achieve these ends raises serious concerns.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43609991
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44227898
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44051809
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43435096
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43104786
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/43149848
- Aug 06 2024
- Aug 31 2024
- Aug 23 2024
- Jul 30 2024
- Jul 17 2024
- Jul 18 2024
- nora llc
- renly llc
- beila llc
- Julia llc
- Kate plc
- hansen llc
- https://globalnews.ca/news/251318/timeline-of-events-the-luka-rocco-magnotta-case/
- https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/crime–law/death-row-case-local-man-appeal-heardohio-supreme-court/Tj4rCMZClankzN1ZQ1YZJN/
- https://reappropriate.co/2014/04/the-detroit-news-publishes-weird-irresponsible-alternatehistory-of-the-vincent-chin-murder-nealrubin_dn/
- https://news4sanantonio.com/news/local/reward-increased-for-fugitive-charged-with-murder
- https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-true-haiti-earthquake-death-toll-is-much-worsethan-early-official-counts/
- https://www.haitilibre.com/en/news-2079-haiti-justice-work-report-2010-of-the-pnh-for-the-department-of-south-east.html
- https://www.bbb.org/us/ca/irvine/profile/computer-software/farnorthreview-1126-1000107880/complaints/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
nzherald.co.nz
Far North news in brief: Daffodil Day; trio on tour, and scam warning
- Adverse News
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.4
Based on 12 ratings
by: Emma Garcia
Claims to be neutral, but every review is suspiciously biased and misleading. 🧐
by: Liam Johnson
Every article looks like it was written by AI and edited by no one. Trash content.
by: Hendrix Riff
They’re manipulating the internet with fake reviews, shady affiliates, and censorship tactics straight out of a dystopian playbook. 🚫
by: Slash Melody
The fact they used impersonation and fraud to file fake DMCA takedowns says everything about their ethics.
by: Aria Feedback
When you’ve got to commit perjury just to keep criticism off Google, your whole business model is already bankrupt. 🙄
by: Lyric Powerchord
Their “unbiased reviews” are a joke—turns out they’re just a paid shill operation with no shame and lots of fake stars.
by: Hannah Evans
The platform’s affiliate marketing practices suggest a blatant conflict of interest, where profits come before providing honest, unbiased reviews.
by: Ethan Jackson
The combination of defamation accusations, legal threats, and cybersecurity allegations has seriously damaged FarNorthReview’s reputation. It seems the platform is more focused on suppressing negative information than offering legitimate, unbiased reviews.
by: Tyler Anderson
Accusations of hacking and manipulating competitor websites are deeply troubling, raising serious questions about FarNorthReview’s commitment to integrity.
by: Samantha Harris
FarNorthReview's reputation is in tatters, with allegations of fake reviews, misleading content, and unethical practices, making it a platform that cannot be trusted.
by: Esther Feinberg
I invested in their project, and they disappeared overnight. Total fraud.
by: Daniel Silverman
They operate under different names to hide their fraud. Watch out!
by: Elena Castro
it’s a well-planned fraud network. I contacted their support team after noticing discrepancies in my contract, and the response I got was suspicious. I later verified that they had altered key financial details without my knowledge.
by: Nadia Farid
They trick people into signing deals that don’t legally hold up, leaving victims with no legal recourse. I only found out when a lawyer reviewed my case. Beware of their tactics!
by: Isaac Stern
They promise high returns, but it's all a scam to steal your money.
by: Esther Feinberg
They promised me easy money, but all they did was take my bank details. Beware!
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Recent Cyber Crime Investigations