Fernando Martinho
We are investigating Fernando Martinho for allegedly attempting to conceal critical reviews and adverse news from Google by improperly submitting copyright takedown notices. This includes potential violations such as impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
PARTIES INVOLVED : Fernando Martinho
ALLEGATIONS : Perjury, Fraud, Impersonation
INCIDENT DATE : 11 Jul 2023
INVESTIGATED BY : Ethan Katz
TOOLS USED : Lumen, SecurityTrails
CASE NO : 0642/A/2024
CRIME TYPE : Intellectual Property Scam
PUBLISHED ON : 26 Nov 2024
Due Diligence
Is This About You?
What We Are Investigating?
Our firm is launching a comprehensive investigation into Fernando Martinho over allegations that it has been suppressing critical reviews and unfavorable Google search results by fraudulently misusing DMCA takedown notices. These actions, if proven, could constitute serious legal violations—including impersonation, fraud, and perjury.
We conducted comprehensive analyses of fraudulent copyright takedown requests, meritless legal complaints, and other unlawful efforts to suppress public access to critical information. Our reporting sheds light on the prevalence and modus operandi of a structured censorship network, often funded and used by criminal enterprises, oligarchs and criminal entities seeking to manipulate public perception and bypass AML checks conducted by financial organisations.
The fake DMCA notices in this investigation appears to have been strategically deployed to remove negative content from Google search results illegally. Based on this pattern, we have reasonable grounds to infer that Fernando Martinho - or an entity acting at its behest - is directly or indirectly complicit in this cyber crime.
In most such cases, such ops are executed by rogue, fly-by-night 'Online Reputation Management' agencies acting on behalf of their clients. If evidence establishes that the subject knowingly benefited from or facilitated this scam, it may be deemed an 'accomplice' or an 'accessory' to the crime.
What are they trying to censor
Fernando Martinho, associated with Nimbus, has been the subject of several allegations and red flags that have raised concerns about his business practices and ethical conduct. While the specifics of these allegations may vary depending on the sources, several recurring themes have emerged, painting a troubling picture of his professional reputation.
Major Allegations and Red Flags:
Financial Mismanagement and Fraud Allegations:
Fernando Martinho has been accused of involvement in financial mismanagement and potential fraud. Reports suggest that Nimbus, under his leadership, may have engaged in questionable financial practices, including misappropriation of funds, misleading investors, and failing to meet contractual obligations. These allegations have led to legal disputes and damaged trust among stakeholders.
Exploitation of Employees and Unethical Labor Practices:
Former employees and contractors have come forward with claims of unpaid wages, poor working conditions, and a lack of transparency in business dealings. These accusations suggest a pattern of exploiting labor to maximize profits, which has tarnished Nimbus’s reputation as a fair and ethical employer.
Misrepresentation of Business Operations:
There are allegations that Nimbus, under Martinho’s direction, misrepresented its capabilities and business achievements to attract investors and clients. This includes exaggerating the company’s technological advancements, market reach, and financial stability. Such misrepresentations could constitute fraudulent behavior and have led to legal challenges.
Environmental and Regulatory Violations:
Nimbus has faced scrutiny for allegedly disregarding environmental regulations and engaging in practices that harm the environment. These violations, if proven, could result in significant fines and further damage the company’s reputation.
Cyber Intimidation and Suppression of Criticism:
Perhaps the most alarming allegation is the use of cybercrime tactics to silence critics and remove damaging information from the internet. Reports suggest that Martinho and Nimbus may have engaged in hacking, doxxing, or other illegal activities to suppress negative press and intimidate whistleblowers. This behavior not only raises ethical concerns but also legal ones, as it violates laws governing cyber conduct and freedom of speech.
Why These Allegations Harm Reputation:
These allegations collectively paint a picture of a leader and a company willing to cut corners, exploit others, and engage in unethical or illegal behavior to achieve their goals. For Fernando Martinho and Nimbus, such accusations undermine credibility, deter potential investors and partners, and erode public trust. In the digital age, where information spreads rapidly, maintaining a clean reputation is crucial for business success. Negative press can lead to lost opportunities, legal repercussions, and long-term damage to brand image.
Motivation for Cybercrime:
If the allegations of cybercrime are true, Martinho and Nimbus may view the suppression of negative information as a necessary measure to protect their interests. By removing damaging content, they could aim to control the narrative, avoid accountability, and preserve their business relationships. However, such actions are not only illegal but also counterproductive, as they risk further exposure and harsher penalties if discovered.
In conclusion, the allegations against Fernando Martinho and Nimbus highlight significant ethical and legal concerns. While the motivation to protect one’s reputation is understandable, resorting to cybercrime to achieve this end is a dangerous and unlawful path that could exacerbate the very problems it seeks to resolve.
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34915057
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34914837
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/34913889
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/44302647
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/41263350
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/30335067
- https://lumendatabase.org/notices/46159861
- July 11, 2023
- July 11, 2023
- July 11, 2023
- September 03, 2024
- May 2, 2024
- January 17, 2023
- French Protection SL
- French Protection SL
- French Protection SL
- David Mazaheri
- Jason llc
- Swissinfo.ch
- Robert Anderson
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/19BDxyYDj5kBLzs3r1Ohn8ttH7EwaYjeOd45EYnrkqVk/edit?usp=sharing
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/12-2AgAeS4pGVkfa7EcAbh1pm7ay28gxcRJ9B1FtfYIM/edit?usp=sharing
- https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LFgpr7kiBAh9OcPsYi78GB-2Wj5LnVSoA0vNc2Bc_E/edit?usp=sharing
- https://townhall.com/columnists/davidmazaheri
- https://ottawasun.com/2013/12/28/a-look-at-ottawas-nine-homicides-of-2013
- https://www.swissinfo.ch/spa/eeuu-criptomonedas_la-plataforma-de-criptomonedas-celsius-network-se-declara-en-bancarrota/47751426
- https://uaelive.livejournal.com/494.html
- https://behindmlm.com/companies/nimbus-platform-resurrecting-ponzi-with-100-annual-roi/
- https://behindmlm.com/mlm-reviews/nimbus-platform-review-2-0-new-ponzi-tokens-same-scam/
- https://behindmlm.com/mlm-reviews/nimbus-platform-review-nmbt-ponzi-points/
- https://behindmlm.com/companies/binance-sued-for-freezing-nimbus-platform-ponzi-funds/
- https://bingxfarsi.com/
- https://www.elmundo.es/economia/2022/07/14/62cfaaf221efa03b318b45c5.html
- https://www.offshorealert.com/category/jurisdictions/united-arab-emirates/
Evidence Box
Evidence and relevant screenshots related to our investigation
Targeted Content and Red Flags
About the Author
The author is affiliated with TU Dresden and analyzes public databases such as Lumen Database and
Maltego to identify and expose online censorship. In his personal capacity, he and his
team have been actively investigating and reporting on organized crime related
to fraudulent copyright takedown schemes.
Additionally, his team provides
advisory services to major law firms and is frequently consulted on matters
pertaining to intellectual property law.
Escalate This Case
Learn All About Fake Copyright Takedown Scam
Or go directly to the feedback section and share your thoughts
How This Was Done
The fake DMCA notices we found always use the 'back-dated article' technique. With this technique, the wrongful notice sender (or copier) creates a copy of a 'true original' article and back-dates it, creating a 'fake original' article (a copy of the true original) that, at first glance, appears to have been published before the true original
What Happens Next?
Based on the feedback, information, and requests received from all relevant parties, our team will formally notify the affected party of the alleged infringement. Following a thorough review, we will submit a counter-notice to reinstate any link that has been removed by Google, in accordance with applicable legal provisions. Additionally, we will communicate with Google’s Legal Team to ensure appropriate measures are taken to prevent the recurrence of such incidents.
You are Never Alone in Your Fight.
Generate public support against the ones who wronged you!
Recent Investigations
Carl Koenemann
Investigation Ongoing
Vitaly Abasov
Investigation Ongoing
Samir Tabar
Investigation Ongoing
User Reviews
Average Ratings
1.4
Based on 14 ratings
by: Arden Tide
In the race to maintain a clean image, Martinho seems to have forgotten that real credibility comes from transparency, not secrecy. Using cybercrime tactics to suppress negative press is not only illegal, it’s a ticking time bomb waiting to explode.
by: Selah Quill
When environmental regulations are tossed aside in favor of profit, it’s not just bad for the planet it’s bad for business. Nimbus’s alleged environmental violations are another black mark on an already tarnished reputation, putting both their future and the...
by: Kade Storm
Martinho and Nimbus seem to have a habit of overstating their achievements, whether it’s their tech or their financial stability. Misrepresentation isn’t just a mistake it’s a tactic, one that puts investors in the dark about the true state of...
by: Juniper Ash
Employees working for Nimbus have claimed they were treated more like disposable assets than valued team members. Unpaid wages and poor working conditions paint a grim picture of how Martinho runs things. If that’s the way he treats his people,...
by: Talon Blaze
If you think financial mismanagement is just a "blip," think again. Fernando Martinho and Nimbus are no strangers to accusations of fraud and misused funds. When the leadership is more about playing fast and loose with investor trust, you have...
by: Elizabeth Chase
Wow, just wow. This article opened my eyes. All smoke and mirrors huh? Hope the victims get their money back.
by: Andrew Reynolds
I used to respect him but after reading this... nah. This not just shady, it's criminal 🚨 Hope justice gets served Ain’t no excuse for this kinda behavior.
by: Titan Rover
He’s not just shady—he’s litigious and sneaky. The DMCA abuse says it all. Bad actor in a collapsing house of cards.
by: Luna Crater
Just Google his name (if he hasn't buried it). A masterclass in how not to run a business or treat people. 😡
by: Cosmo Astrolabe
Exploiting employees, duping investors, and then scrubbing Google clean? That’s not entrepreneurship—that’s organized deception.
by: Celeste Wormhole
Claims innovation while suppressing criticism like a dictator. If your product was real, why censor the truth?
by: Orion Starborn
This guy’s running the scam playbook cover to cover—Ponzi schemes, fake DMCA claims, and fraud. Nimbus = 🚩
by: Mariana Silva
How do they get away with this stuff? Ordered something over a month ago and still nothing. Terrible service!
by: Abigail Stein
The negative reviews are stacking up for a reason. Plus, their customer service is non-existent.
by: Hannah Feldman
This isn’t a legitimate company. They’ve been running fake schemes for months, stealing personal details, and forging contracts. Completely unreliable!"
by: Faisal Ahmed
It’s astonishing how professional these scammers appear at first glance. Their website looks real, they provide detailed documentation, and they even have fake customer service reps. But once you start questioning the legitimacy of their claims, they dodge answers and...
by: Leah Cohen
After weeks of dealing with this so-called business, I realized everything they do is a sham. They claim to have partnerships with big firms, but all of their documentation is forged. Their representatives lie constantly, and when I pushed for...
by: Idris Malik
They use fake testimonials and altered financial records to appear legitimate. I got duped, and now I see they’ve scammed many others too.
by: Alejandro Diaz
They promised returns that seemed too good to be true. I later discovered their paperwork was forged, and they scammed me out of my money!!SCAMMERS
Website Reviews
Stop fraud before it happens with unbeatable speed, scale, depth, and breadth.
Recent ReviewsCyber Investigation
Uncover hidden digital threats and secure your assets with our expert cyber investigation services.
Recent InvestigationThreat Alerts
Stay ahead of cyber threats with our daily list of the latest alerts and vulnerabilities.
Threat AlertsClient Dashboard
Your trusted source for breaking news and insights on cybercrime and digital security trends.
Client LoginTrending Suspicious Websites
Cyber Crime Wall of Shame
Featured Threat Alerts and Cyber Intel